Re: Re: Obama inspired by India
by Abbas rizvi on Apr 14, 2009 04:47 PM
Yes, Kandhamal(2008), Gujrat(2002), delhi (1984) are landmark years, that Obama got inspired from. :D
Re: Re: Re: Obama inspired by India
by nishad dhamane on Apr 14, 2009 05:03 PM
Please remember only Past. Cant you see the example of Gujrat (post godhra. See the developement. All print media and news TV's are bull shit n pro congress. Congress is fooling u guys from past so many years but still u r not understanding.
Re: Re: Re: Obama inspired by India
by Meenakshi Gupta on Apr 14, 2009 04:57 PM
Itna pakate kyun ho yaar. Even after all these, India's reputation is not so bad as you would love to think.
We don't have any Muslim country in the world where the Hindus are extended the same special rights that all the Muslims enjoy in India. The Congress party has created a slavish nation where the 85 per cent majority craves for the indulgence, patronage and sufferance of the 15 per cent minority. We don't have the example of a single Muslim country where a non-Muslim can become its President or Prime Minister. States like Maharashtra, Bihar, Kerala, Pondichery, all Hindu-majority States, have in the past elected Muslims as Chief Ministers. Can ever a Hindu dream of ever becoming the Chief Minister of Muslim majority Jammu & Kashmir?
Re: think
by hanif muhammed on Apr 14, 2009 06:32 PM
Kritika,
Indonesia is one where Muslims have Hindu names and an independent island has Hindu traditions intact. It is the country with the largest Muslim population and Hindus living like equals . you know what a Christian majority Timor broke away from it.
Re: think
by sanal kumar on Apr 14, 2009 05:03 PM
Hi all those figures are garbage... do you think muslims are only 12% ... hindus 85%..if that is so then no party will run around minority.. successive govt have manipulated censes.. muslims will be more than 20 %..
Re: think
by pure indian on Apr 14, 2009 05:14 PM
yes u r right see the muslim world u cannot take name of our goddess in their country and these people talk abt secularism in india becoz we give them freedom. if u give whole country its not enough for them.
I think EC should change the rule - a party can be called national party only if it wins at least one third seats in Loksabha. Then India will not have any national party.
Re: National Party rule amendment by EC
by kesireddy sreedhar on Apr 14, 2009 04:50 PM
Any party, either to the assembly or the parliament if wanted to contest in elections, EC should make a rule that it is compulsory to contest minimum 51% of total seats.
1. Poverty 2. Hunger 3. Jobcut 4. Lack of proper governance 5. Rising price of Good 6. Economic instability 7. Family Dynasty 8. Lack of Social Security 9. Poor people become poor 10. Lack of Infrastructure for Industrial Growth 11. Lack of Basic Health Support in Villages 12. Security 13. Peasants are starving and Dying , no steps to support them 14. No employment facility for youth 15. Young people are frustrated because lack of support fro Govt 16. Lack of Basic Infrastructure for Sports 17. Thousands of Villagers are living wihout Electricity and Drinking Water 18. Fee hike in Private Schools
Re: Contribution of Con
by Raj Thakre on Apr 14, 2009 04:51 PM
Contribution of BJP
1. Divide country on the basis of religion 2. Mislead innocent people on Ram-mandir issue. 3. Due to Rath Yatra, thousands of people were killed in Ayodhya. 4. Release of terrorists in Kandhar episode which master minded 26/11. 5. After coming to power, forget about hindus. 6. Only during election time they remember lord Ram 7. Could not do anything when they were in power at the center 8. Godhra incindent
Jinnah was responsible for the Partition of India and he created the Islamic Republic of Pakistan with the full connivance and acquiescence of the Congress party. At least Jinnah had the courage and conviction to call his country an `Islamic Republic` while the Congress party has only divided the country on communal lines in the name of `secularism`. The present UPA government is only interested in creating a `pseudo` Islamic Republic of India unlike the true `Islamic Republic` of Pakistan. No wonder Pakistan is strong in their natural `secularism` and we are shaky in our unnatural `pseudo- secularism`.
Re: BJP =communal , BJP -2000 to 2004
by Sambhaji Pandhare on Apr 14, 2009 04:39 PM
What bull shit u r talking. First thing Gujrat roit should be seen as immediate reaction of the ocmmom Hindus.
If you see MUmbai 1993 blast, if Shivsena would have not been in Mumbai 70% hindus would have slotted. I do not ur place but person like me willl never forget that roits and aggression by Muslims
