Discussion Board

Need 10 yrs to rid India of poverty: PM


Total 1725 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Mr Walker
I heard all sickulars are scared of anti-corruption drive
by Mr Walker on Apr 11, 2009 10:53 AM  | Hide replies

I heard the sickular brigade is scared sh1t of anti-corruption drive.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Paul Benjamin
Re: I heard all sickulars are scared of anti-corruption drive
by Paul Benjamin on Apr 11, 2009 10:55 AM
no even the comicular brigade too is scared about it...they didnt even leave coffins of dead brave soliders and even that money is in swiss banks

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jiggs
Re: Re: I heard all sickulars are scared of anti-corruption drive
by Jiggs on Apr 11, 2009 11:00 AM
Well Caangress had a chance to nail the BJP in the past 5 years, what happened, the whole hoodwinking by the Chritians and Muslims fell apart??????


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: I heard all sickulars are scared of anti-corruption drive
by Against Pseudos on Apr 11, 2009 11:00 AM
Banjo:

Yeah... and therefore Kaangress in their typical style did not even whisper of any Coffin scam during their 5 years... :)

Kaangress is also trying to protect BJP by not going after any Swiss account money either... :)

In your twisted world, that certainly shows that Kaangress has sprouted wings behind their shoulders... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
kieran dsouza
u are cause of poverty
by kieran dsouza on Apr 11, 2009 10:53 AM

if u want to get rid of poverty then remove license raj, excise raj and encourage self employment rather than useless NREGA vote bank schemes

they know so much about poverty removal because they are the main cause for it!!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Paul Benjamin
hey i heard sushma confimed that chaddies will looose
by Paul Benjamin on Apr 11, 2009 10:51 AM  | Hide replies

I read last week that sush confirmed that chaddie will be beaten black and blue...serves them right for their doings

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Jiggs
Re: hey i heard sushma confimed that chaddies will looose
by Jiggs on Apr 11, 2009 10:57 AM
Sonia has done issued an edict last week that all catholics will have to share each others chaddies. Thee chaddies have to be first blessed by the priests, they cannot do without it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
motilal kotarya
Re: hey i heard sushma confimed that chaddies will looose
by motilal kotarya on Apr 11, 2009 10:57 AM
Chaddi is much better as comparing JUTA(Shoos)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aurora borealis
Re: hey i heard sushma confimed that chaddies will looose
by aurora borealis on Apr 11, 2009 10:54 AM
You are a filthy person whose whole world revolves around chaddis.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mr Walker
Re: Re: hey i heard sushma confimed that chaddies will looose
by Mr Walker on Apr 11, 2009 10:55 AM
Forgive him he never got one ;)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Paul Benjamin
Re: Re: Re: hey i heard sushma confimed that chaddies will looose
by Paul Benjamin on Apr 11, 2009 10:56 AM
got many but for pinky ponky ha ha

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vidisha
Re: Re: Re: Re: hey i heard sushma confimed that chaddies will lo
by Vidisha on Apr 11, 2009 11:03 AM
If selling chaddis is all you can do, then thats your misfortune.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Paul Benjamin
Re: Re: hey i heard sushma confimed that chaddies will looose
by Paul Benjamin on Apr 11, 2009 10:56 AM
because there is sin only in and around chaddies ha ha

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: hey i heard sushma confimed that chaddies will looose
by Against Pseudos on Apr 11, 2009 10:55 AM
Banjo:

BJP and NDA will win not only Zero seats, but Zero votes this election.... now go back to your selective reading.... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Paul Benjamin
Re: Re: hey i heard sushma confimed that chaddies will looose
by Paul Benjamin on Apr 11, 2009 10:57 AM
pseudo, wait n watch..hey why dont u send me an email to paulbenzy at rediff...i hav an offer for u

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: hey i heard sushma confimed that chaddies will looose
by Against Pseudos on Apr 11, 2009 11:01 AM
Banjo:

So you are now doubting that BJP and NDA will win zero votes?... ;-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vidisha
Re: Re: Re: Re: hey i heard sushma confimed that chaddies will lo
by Vidisha on Apr 11, 2009 11:04 AM
Forgive him, he replies without reading ;-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Jiggs
Re: Hi paul is back for ten minutes
by Jiggs on Apr 11, 2009 10:49 AM
Paul is back for 10 minutes, as he has got a TEN MINUTE BREAK IN THE TOILET CLEANING DETAIL HE WAS DOING!!!!!


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Paul Benjamin
Re: Re: Hi paul is back for ten minutes
by Paul Benjamin on Apr 11, 2009 10:50 AM
ha ha ha ... yeah u know as if u were in with me ha ha

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Paul Benjamin
Re: Re: Hi paul is back for ten minutes
by Paul Benjamin on Apr 11, 2009 10:49 AM
lick Chaddie, cut haddie

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Paul Benjamin
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hi paul is back for ten minutes
by Paul Benjamin on Apr 11, 2009 10:50 AM
jinnah fan will refill it ha ha

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Trideep Nath
Re: Hi paul is back for ten minutes
by Trideep Nath on Apr 11, 2009 10:50 AM
If MMS can ask for 10 yrs why can't Paul ask for 10 mins..


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Trideep Nath
Hajj Pilgrims Vs Amarnath Pilgrims - India
by Trideep Nath on Apr 11, 2009 10:46 AM  | Hide replies

In youtube,
search "Hajj Pilgrims Vs Amarnath Pilgrims - India"
watch it once.
Indian Govt spends 500 crores of Rs every yr, to send Mulims to Haj Pilgrims, to do their rituals,
same Congress govt revoke land aquisition in Kashmir to hurt hindu sentiments. Mere land was actually alloted to Hindus to set up Dharamshala and hospital for the Hindu Pilgrims in Amarnath. What a secular country?
Hope hindus wake up on this .. and stop supporting Congress


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Paul Benjamin
Re: Hajj Pilgrims Vs Amarnath Pilgrims - India
by Paul Benjamin on Apr 11, 2009 10:52 AM
what has congress got to do with this...it was tehre during bjp regime too....infact the quota was increased in their regime foooll

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Hajj Pilgrims Vs Amarnath Pilgrims - India
by Against Pseudos on Apr 11, 2009 10:56 AM
Banjo:

1) When was there ever a BJP regime?
2) You think the NDA regime did better than Kaangress, right?...
:)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Trideep Nath
Re: Re: Hajj Pilgrims Vs Amarnath Pilgrims - India
by Trideep Nath on Apr 11, 2009 10:59 AM
my friend helping Haj Pilgrims started long time back started by Congress continued thru bjp regime and is there now too. We do not have any objection on that.
See its contrast to Amarnath Pilgrims, land was alloted by bjp govt, so that Pilgrims can take rest, recover if sick. Congress revoke that land to lick Muslim.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
VIshal
82 5 maybe win = 87 yrs
by VIshal on Apr 11, 2009 10:46 AM  | Hide replies

The BJP will not oppose Sharad Pawar as the prime minister if he joins the National Democratic Alliance and post election seat mathematics works in his favour

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: 82 5 maybe win = 87 yrs
by Against Pseudos on Apr 11, 2009 10:47 AM
Vishal:

Yeah... you would no doubt believe anything that is said by BJP.... :)

So you surely would believe that Advani is their PM candidate?... ;-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: 82 5 maybe win = 87 yrs
by Against Pseudos on Apr 11, 2009 10:57 AM
Banjo:

I am not dreaming.... Advani is NDA's PM candidate.... :)
Even if you keep denying it through your constant denial mode... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aurora borealis
Re: Re: Re: 82 5 maybe win = 87 yrs
by aurora borealis on Apr 11, 2009 10:54 AM
Pervert!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mr Walker
What is he planning exactly ??
by Mr Walker on Apr 11, 2009 10:45 AM  | Hide replies

I have been hearing Garibi Hatao slogan of Congress since my childhood and it has existed before that so they have had almost 50 years till date and nothing has happened except population explosion of poor.

What exactly is he planning " mass genocide" like that of Hitler ??

This person has so much ego that he mocks and laughs at others when he has nothing much to show as achievement.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
VIshal
Re: What is he planning exactly ??
by VIshal on Apr 11, 2009 10:46 AM
In monarchy ..Yatha Raja Ththa Praja .. iN democracy Yatha Praja ththa Raja

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: What is he planning exactly ??
by Against Pseudos on Apr 11, 2009 11:02 AM
Vishal:

Hmmm.... so we have to put up with this bunch becoz of stoopidity of people like you?.... interesting... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jiggs
Re: What is he planning exactly ??
by Jiggs on Apr 11, 2009 10:47 AM
The fact that after 5 years in power they have to go back to their TRIED AND TESTED FORMULA FROM THE 20TH CENTURY,speaks for the duplicity of this government.
fugg Congress

   Forward   |   Report abuse
kieran dsouza
Re: What is he planning exactly ??
by kieran dsouza on Apr 11, 2009 10:55 AM
in fact these chaps are experts in creation of poverty rather than removal.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
VIshal
Re: Rahul Gandhi will remain same idiot even after 10 years
by VIshal on Apr 11, 2009 10:47 AM
"The BJP will not oppose Sharad Pawar as the prime minister if he joins the National Democratic Alliance and post election seat mathematics works in his favour."

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Rahul Gandhi will remain same idiot even after 10 years
by Against Pseudos on Apr 11, 2009 10:57 AM
Vishal:

Yeah... you would no doubt believe anything that is said by BJP.... :)

So you surely would believe that Advani is their PM candidate?... ;-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mr Walker
Re: Re: Rahul Gandhi will remain same idiot even after 10 years
by Mr Walker on Apr 11, 2009 10:52 AM
Yes do you have a problem with that ??

If you break all rules others will too get some sense man.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dhaval
Ten years is not a very long time so we should trust him once.
by Dhaval on Apr 11, 2009 10:40 AM  | Hide replies

MMS is not a controversial politician like Advani or Modi. Nor he is banned in any country. Whole world love him after Mahatma Gandhi so we have only option left to Vote and support for him during this Political instability.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Jiggs
Re: Ten years is not a very long time so we should trust him once
by Jiggs on Apr 11, 2009 10:44 AM
We have already trusted him once, time for him to hang in his boots and take proper care for his WEAK HEART.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Indian ed
Re: Re: Ten years is not a very long time so we should trust him
by Indian ed on Apr 11, 2009 10:57 AM
Unfortunately, our Politicians are all busy saying "They are bad, so vote for me" No one is saying "I am good, vote for me". And discussion boards thrive on people who rant about everyones bad side.
When will we learn? How will we-as a country- move forward?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mr Walker
Re: Ten years is not a very long time so we should trust him once
by Mr Walker on Apr 11, 2009 10:46 AM
Please speak for yourself not the whole world.

You and Congress supporters do not make the whole world.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Ten years is not a very long time so we should trust him once
by Against Pseudos on Apr 11, 2009 10:49 AM
Dhaval:

I am impressed by your credulity... :) Your forefathers no doubt kept waiting for those 10 years, and your great grand children will do so too... :)

As for voting for MMS, I don't see any possibility of ANY Indian being able to do so, for there isn't a seat safe enough for him to stand from... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
kabayan
A B C D
by kabayan on Apr 11, 2009 10:40 AM  | Hide replies

People talking about Nuclear deal in this discussion board even if they don't know the ABC of nuclear deal ! What a rubbish !

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Paul Benjamin
Re: A B C D
by Paul Benjamin on Apr 11, 2009 10:53 AM
everybody knows everything about it...baked half cooked knowledge given by chaddies..who themself dont know the abc of anything good for india

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
kabayan
Re: Re: A B C D
by kabayan on Apr 11, 2009 10:51 AM
Jiggs you are lucky that you are alive today only because of my Madrasa Education, If I got education like Rama sene or Dooma Sene you will be out of this world or may be behind bars.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: A B C D
by Against Pseudos on Apr 11, 2009 10:53 AM
Thanks for the threat.... but it's not a question of education.... :)

It's a question of survival... which will ONLY take another 10 more years.... :)

Problem is that the 10 years is a moving target.... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
dudehere
Re: Re: Re: A B C D
by dudehere on Apr 11, 2009 12:13 PM
didnt know that ram sene are active in porkistan and afganistan... and somalia...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jiggs
Re: Re: Re: A B C D
by Jiggs on Apr 11, 2009 10:56 AM
kabayan...Hata be....Kisko dhamki de raha hai....
I will kick your a s s

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Govind Lal
Re: A B C D
by Govind Lal on Apr 12, 2009 02:37 PM
Mr.kabayan
Please read my postings under the heading 'No downturn for India's nuclear power plan' 22.1.09 rediff.
India surrendered its sovereignty by signing the declaration in 2005. Go through the Hyde act and satisfy yourself. By signing the Ndeal they have put India on the road to A DEBT TRAP of unimaginable depth just like the BLACK HOLE in the universe.
Our special envoy has signed several agreements for MEGA loans to the tune of $150 Billions equal to 7.5lakh crores rupees for building nuclear plants of total capacity 10000 MW. The project reports are prepared with cooked up datas. The life of plants are assumed as 100 years-absurd. Energy cost is assumed as Rs2/- per unit. Real cost at the present level is Rs8/-per unit. After 10 years it will be Rs15/- upwards due to inflation etc. The Congress did not pass any legislation for movement of nuclear materials (Junks). RBI the only government agency involved in the projects has to be vigilant about the debt trap. It may be a holocaust in the Indian financial sector. Worse than the MELTDOWN!!


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: A B C D
by Against Pseudos on Apr 11, 2009 10:52 AM
Antriksh Yan:

We shall see what we shall see.... we've seen two dozen poverty eradication programmes, tens of rozgar yojnas, and now the nuclear deal ...

On ground reality, we only see increasing poor, with ONLY 10 more years needed to get them rich, we'e seen more and more unemployed youth testimonial to all the rozgar yojnas, we've seen power cuts hovering dangeroulsy close to more than 10 hours a day, and we've seen prices soar like wild fire when the PM himself does not know what the ground situation is, and bows before the journalists opinion conceding that they know better than him..... ;-)

No doubt the ABC's of nuclear physics is going to save the world.... ;-)

Another Jai Ho, and another oscar for India please... ;-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Govind Lal
Re: A B C D
by Govind Lal on Apr 12, 2009 02:40 PM
Mr.kabayan
Please see the contentious issues in the Hyde act
1. No freedom to handle spent fuel.
2. No guarantee for alternate fuel supply
3. India is not a technology developer but a recipient.
4. India to side with US in NPT
5. India to participate with US National Security Administration for NPT.
6. Reporting of US President on the efforts of India in containing IRAN.
7. India denied space related dual use technology
8. India denied strategic planning of nuclear programms.
9. Stopped India in the production of fissile materials.
10.No joint move for universal nuclear disarmament.
11.All future agreements are to be in consistent with this act.
Hyde act is the enabling act for the 123 agreement.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 1725 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Write a message