The last thing on thendi's mind was a big Indian score necessary on that ground , he simply ground his way to a boring century leaving the others to post a reasonable score
Re: Re: Selfishness should have limits
by raghavendra prabhu on Mar 17, 2012 10:33 AM
Yes true. Atleast he scored a century, playing almost half of the overs and scoring just 1/3rd the team total. What a selfish A-----e.
Sachin bradman puh who , sachin without any doubt.
Sachin 32000 runs. Bradman 6000 runs.
Sachin 269 sixes. Bradman 6 sixes.
Sachin played all three formats of cricket. Bradman played just one format with just 52 matches.
Sachin played on 90 pitches. Bradman played on 7 pitches.
Sachin played against 13 teams. Bradman played against 4 teams.
Sachin played 650 matches. Bradman played just 52 matches.
Sachin took 200 wickets. Bradman took 2 wickets.
sachin played walsh ambros akram mcgrath warne murli etc bradman played larwood only
sachin time video analysis for batsman shortcomings technolgy bradman no such
Bradman's contribution is less than 18% contribution of Sachin to CRICKET. Hats off to master blaster.
Thanx to everyone for participation in pretty easy question.
@SelfishBradman Yeah, there were no jets in 1930s. Thats not the fault of Sachin. Bradman played in that era where there were no techniques available to know weaknesses of batsman. On the other side before every series opposition does special homework for Sachin to take his wicket as early as possible. Yeah, there was only one format in 1930, thats not fault of Sachin again. In Sachin's era three formats were available and he played every format with consistency and brilliance. Yeah, there were less test playing nations in comparison to today which means less variety of oppositions which helps to boost your average.
Re: .
by vijay on Mar 17, 2012 08:46 AM
Sachin bradman puh who , sachin without any doubt.
Sachin 32000 runs. Bradman 6000 runs.
Sachin 269 sixes. Bradman 6 sixes.
Sachin played all three formats of cricket. Bradman played just one format with just 52 matches.
Sachin played on 90 pitches. Bradman played on 7 pitches.
Sachin played against 13 teams. Bradman played against 4 teams.
Sachin played 650 matches. Bradman played just 52 matches.
Sachin took 200 wickets. Bradman took 2 wickets.
sachin played walsh ambros akram mcgrath warne murli etc bradman played larwood only
sachin time video analysis for batsman shortcomings technolgy bradman no such
Bradman's contribution is less than 18% contribution of Sachin to CRICKET. Hats off to master blaster.
Thanx to everyone for participation in pretty easy question.
@SelfishBradman Yeah, there were no jets in 1930s. Thats not the fault of Sachin. Bradman played in that era where there were no techniques available to know weaknesses of batsman. On the other side before every series opposition does special homework for Sachin to take his wicket as early as possible. Yeah, there was only one format in 1930, thats not fault of Sachin again. In Sachin's era three formats were available and he played every format with consistency and brilliance. Yeah, there were less test playing nations in comparison to today which means less variety of oppositions which helps to boost your average.
Re: .
by vijay on Mar 17, 2012 08:48 AM
Every one knows that Sachin is better even it is now scientifically proved.
The Bradman museum is erecting a statue of Sachin.
Do you know why they are erecting his statue,to attract crowd, nowdays nobody goes there but when sachin statue get erected there ,more people will attract towards the museaum.
Sachin is bigger than cricket ,and don was a cricketer. Its easy who is best .
Sachin is better than Bradman by FAR!
Cool Proofs: *1 Sachin played against the world best bowlers. i.e. Shane Warne,Murli, Mcgrath, Lee, Thompson, Gillespie etc.. *2 Sachin Played matches regularly. I mean today's tight schedule u can see as Sachin played 166 Tests in 20 years whereas Bradman played only 52 in 20 years. *3 Sachin was given out LBW oftenly in his career whereas in Bradman's era there was no LBW in the game. *4 Sachin got out occasionally due to bad umpiring in his career. where as Bradman was favoured by umpire on thin edges.
Re: .
by raj kumar on Mar 17, 2012 10:19 AM
bradman has not played when he was 22-31 years bcz for world war 2. still he is best when he man 289 against bodyline bowling can sachin do it no even in the dreams
I think this match was set just so Sachin Tendoor can make the last century of his life. Big deal. The deal was Bangla Desh will let him make a century but India will let Bangla Desh win. Could I not hear about or see him again please. This is height of selfishness.
Re: OK....
by Indian on Mar 17, 2012 08:32 AM
Enjoy the moment you silly fellow.its no small achievement. Delivering under such huge pressure of expectations...awesome effort...you loser can you deliver under pressure...just think for a second before you comment. Sachin made whole India proud.
Re: Re: OK....
by Mogumbo Returns on Mar 17, 2012 04:52 PM
He did this for himself and Marhattaas like you. What is in there for an average Indian, you fool. It is a shame that Cricket team in Bombay is named Indians. They should be called shiv sainiks.
ramana murty over by ramana murty (View MyPage) on Mar 17, 2012 05:39 AM
with this for tendulkar all records are over.but one record is playing .that is playing with his son.he played ravi he is now commentator.so are manjrekar and saurav.only dravid is pending.so people keep cheering this man till he plays with his son.
