Re: 53 wins.. 22 losses... 25 draws
by Crick fan on Mar 17, 2012 10:00 AM
Is he playing for country that we win only half the times he scores a ton. Not great record to have
Though it is a legacy to hit 100th ton but these hundreds never helped the team to win...Infact last hundred was at the cost of loss of many matches...It is the time for Sachin uncle to go...
Re: Legacy and selfishnes come together
by ice berg on Mar 17, 2012 05:21 AM
Hi Paki...see this...
Gawd 100 statistics for all those who care--- 1) ODI- 49 x100, 34 India won. No other batsman comes close to him including cheating from down under. 2) Tests- 51 x100, 20 India won with 20 draw. Safe to say when gawd scores a century, less likely India will lose.
Re: Legacy and selfishnes come together
by Indian on Mar 17, 2012 08:41 AM
If the same feat is achieved by a paki..your story would have been different.. Sour grapes,...
Indian cricket is all about Advtg Dollars BCCI had to start the era of MatchFixing to revive cricket after 2007 WorldCup Debacle. They needed a guy who cud be dependable & controllable & chose Dhoni Now Dhoni realized that if Sachin Scores a century & India wins, ALL credit goes to Sachin, no matter how well others played & he then cant overshadow Sachin in popularity & Advtg. So Dhoni started throwing matches when Sachin had a 100 unless they were absolutely critical. Look at the stats of Sachin 100 ending in Indias win before & After Dhoni was captain
Dhoni keeps on insisting on playing weak/new players so they can be easily manipulated to throw matches. Even ydays match, check scorecard from 35th over. It was Dinda, Pathan & Praveen Kumar that leaked runs so heavily to lose a match that should have been easily won. If they hadnt leaked those runs on Dhonis order, they would have been thrown out. By losing match of Sachins 100th century, Dhoni fulfilled his aim of marginalizing the impact of this event. So all HAIL DHONI, the master Fixer before you hail Sachin the Master Blaster
BTW all these epithets are also Advertising catchphrases (Master Blaster,Nawab of Najafgardh, The Wall, Very Very Special Laxman)
Indian cricket is all about Advtg Dollars BCCI had to start the era of MatchFixing to revive cricket after 2007 WorldCup Debacle. They needed a guy who cud be dependable & controllable & chose Dhoni Now Dhoni realized that if Sachin Scores a century & India wins, ALL credit goes to Sachin, no matter how well others played & he then cant overshadow Sachin in popularity & Advtg. So Dhoni started throwing away matches when Sachin had a 100 unless they were absolutely critical. Look at the stats of Sachin 100 ending in Indias win before & After Dhoni was captain
Dhoni keeps on insisting on playing weak/new players so they can be easily manipulated to throw matches. Even ydays match, check scorecard from 35th over. It was Dinda, Pathan & Praveen Kumar that leaked runs so heavily to lose a match that should have been easily won. If they hadnt leaked those runs on Dhonis order, they would have been thrown out. By losing match of Sachins 100th century, Dhoni fulfilled his aim of marginalizing the impact of this event. So all HAIL DHONI, the master Fixer before you hail Sachin the Master Blaster
BTW all these epithets are also Advertising catchphrases (Master Blaster,Nawab of Najafgardh, The Wall, Very Very Special Laxman)
Sachin has scored more centuries on bouncy wickets than many of the celebrated cricketers who scored centuries in their entire career :) if you have doubt on number of matches played see Averages :)
Re: marvellous
by Ting Tang on Mar 17, 2012 12:53 AM
Yes, but clebrations were spoiled by jai chands in the team who lost to bangla desh in a crucial match!Did irfan pathan play for bangla desh??? he gave 20 runs in one over!drop irfan from our side forever, he does not merit a place in the team,shame,irfan
out of this 100, nearly 70 have come on sub-continental wickets... I wonder how much runs would Sir Viv Richards, Ponting, Lara, Kallis would have scored if they got to play 70 - 80 percent of their games on flat wickets with no swing and bounce.... Sir Viv Richards for sure would have managed to hit atleast 200 centuries if he had the luxury to play on such wickets....
Re: nothing so great
by vivek agrahari on Mar 17, 2012 02:40 AM
But we should also consider, that he played against some of great bowlers, not against slow Indian bowlers as other batsmen get the chance.
Re: nothing so great
by vivek agrahari on Mar 17, 2012 02:40 AM
But we should also consider, that he played against some of great bowlers, not against slow Indian bowlers as other batsmen get the chance.
Re: nothing so great
by Alok Kumar on Mar 17, 2012 12:28 AM
I'm sure H'd have & y Sir Viv, Even u & U'r Mama wud also hv (IN U'r Dreams). What a LOSER u R.. Shame on dust like u.
Re: nothing so great
by Murali Krishnan on Mar 17, 2012 12:33 AM
Sachin has scored more centuries on bouncy wickets than many of the celebrated cricketers who scored centuries in their entire career :) if you have doubt on number of matches played see Averages :)
Re: nothing so great
by zakir nadeem on Mar 17, 2012 12:37 AM
well said...and just a reminder ...his slow run rate today caused an embarassing defeat ...
may be ur snail pace in the 2nd power play did nt cost india the match. we agree to ur countless swear that u r nt playing fr records...
but pl sachin pl retire aftr ur 50th odi century fr godsake. der is something called graciously fading away frm the spotlight also..... spare a thougt fr the kids who r waiting in the fringes for eons....
