With seniors in the team,we managed to loose by 8-0 in Aus and England ,Without seniors it could be more worse lke 8-(Negative 8).Thats why we cannot afford to loose the seniors as they are the one who make sure that we lost by 0 not by negatives.
Re: Thanks to the Seniors
by Against Pseudos on Feb 11, 2012 02:36 PM
Good logic. We should send Under 13s next time. :-) Also nice to hear that umesh Yadav can now be safely made Test captain of those under 13s. ;-)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Irritating views
by shiva on Feb 11, 2012 12:28 PM
We have three on their last legs. Better we retire at least two. We are slogging old horses
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Irritating views
by Against Pseudos on Feb 11, 2012 12:36 PM
By that definition Ponting, Hussey and Hogg also on last legs. :-)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Irritating views
by Against Pseudos on Feb 11, 2012 06:16 PM
:-)... Yeah. Richard Hadlee is doing that. Wasting time with YOU...
We are not required any suggestion from out side as we are capable to take our own decision.Seniors should retire immediately even they donot want for the interest of the country and vacate place for our future youngstars what Australia did.
Re: Seniors
by S.Parameswaran on Feb 11, 2012 11:24 AM
I fully agrree with you.I do not understand why certain people are worshipping these senior cricketers so much. What is that they are going to be benefitted by these worshipping. They should understand cricket is not based on individual performance like Tennis or Chess, it is team effort.No individual can claim if the team win matches. Ghe advertisement people also should think about this. Instead of paying huge amount to these people and charge the public they as well reduce the price for their products, so that many people can be benefitted instead one person minting money without paying proper income tax
Re: Seniors
by Rajiv Kumar on Feb 11, 2012 11:53 AM
Jatin, suggestions are not from Sunny Leone or Yana Gupta or Mandira Bedi. It is from people who have played cricket. Infact, your & my suggestions are not required since we have zero experience when it comes to playing international cricket.
Mike Hussey rested for Adelaide game vs India on sunday. When dhoni says Sachin may be rested for one game Sunny Gavaskar is fuming with steam coming out of his ears. No australian past players is fuming when an in form hussey is rested.
Re: mike
by Rajiv Kumar on Feb 11, 2012 10:58 AM
U need to understand my friend, Aussies have won 2 out of 2. They can experiment now. We dont have the luxury now.
Re: Re: Re: mike
by Rajiv Kumar on Feb 11, 2012 11:05 AM
Sachin contributed 48 in the match vs Lanka. He was involved in a partnership with Kohli for around 75 runs or so. This was the highest partnership in the match followed by Jadeja & Ashwin (53 runs). I dont understand when u say "he is only interested abt his 100". U mean no other batsman is interested to score runs/century? And doesnt Sachin's 100 (if at all it happens) add to India's score? Each batsman would dream of scoring a century each time he goes to bat. None of them have seen this dream come true.
Re: Re: Re: Re: mike
by Truth on Feb 11, 2012 02:29 PM
DESMOND HEYNES NOT OUT ON MORE NO. OF OCCASSION AND MANY TIME GUIDE HIS TEAM SAFELY. HE PLAYED HALF NO OF MATCHES COMPARE TO SACHIN. HE DID NO OF PARTNERSHIP WITH SUBSEQUENT BATSMAN TO BUILD INNING TOTAL. NOT PLAYED FOR PERSONAL RECORD
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: mike
by Against Pseudos on Feb 11, 2012 06:18 PM
Untruth: :-)... If Indian bowlers bowl like Garner, Marshall, Holding etc. our openers also can chase down sub 100 totals. :-)
Re: Re: Re: Re: mike
by Abhijit Nair on Feb 11, 2012 11:10 AM
so how many times has he stayed till team won? that is more important than anything else Remember M Clarke after he made one of the best 150 on a seaming and swinging pitch @ Cape town but in the end aus lost , clarke said he does not even want to remember his inn as it went in vain
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: mike
by Rajiv Kumar on Feb 11, 2012 11:29 AM
Nair, if openers had to do all the job what is the duty of the middle order? If Clarke does not want to remember his innings, fine. Why should we be bothered? By ur logic, even Agelo Mathews should not remember his innings yesterday :-)
Because Clarke doesnt want to remember his innings, it doesnt mean the century is added to his total runs :-)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: mike
by Against Pseudos on Feb 11, 2012 02:30 PM
But Clarke already forgot that useless inning. Why YOU still repeating that inning twice here? ;-)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: mike
by Against Pseudos on Feb 11, 2012 06:19 PM
But Clarke already forgot that useless inning. Why YOU still repeating that inning twice here? ;-)
