Re: Yusuf Pathank will not play a single ODI in 2011
by ASHISH KUMAR on Jun 19, 2011 12:27 PM
Why same rule doesn't apply for dhoni & raina. They flops continously even for 20 matches but still continue to play. now if ur position is secured after so many failures- you will defintely click once a while like what dhoni & raina does.
Re: Yusuf Pathank will not play a single ODI in 2011
by pradeep agarwal on Jun 17, 2011 07:54 PM
He is another Pollard who on his day can tear apart any attack.it is a different matter that such days are rare,
Re: Bad selection for last match.
by D S on Jun 17, 2011 03:14 PM
We mentioned, selection should include Harbhajan (3 specialist spinners) or pragyan and there was no need to play Parthiv Patel, could have tried Saha.
Raina was playing in hurry, he showed no patience mostly because burden of captaincy and
videsh coach or pat from someone senior to calm him and guide him.
Kohli was all set, yet he was in hurry to take second run when he did not complete the
first run in hurry i.e had stopped before second run. When there is chance for second run,
it is alway easy to take 5 steps for second run and come back to the crease. this is what
indian batsmen should discuss. But it is not possible to come back if player takes 20 steps.
Rohit played well, but Rohit flashed flat bat in hurry. All he had to do was to time his hit well for the slower ball but he was more concerned about bowler not falling for him moving his leg. Rohit needs to practice the flat bat more on spin-etc to correct his timing because flat bat like baseball needs perfect time. The baseball players even hit 100 mile-hour ball with flat bat due to proper timing.
Tiwari showed bravery, yet he poked on the ball he could have hit either with flat horizontal bat (if timing was there) or should have left it or with vertical bat if he moved his feet to get behind the ball.
In all, India could have won the match if they got 3rd specialist spinner as we had asked the selector. MISHRA WAS OVER EXPOSED and ashwin was not at his lethal best.
Re: Re: Bad selection for last match.
by D S on Jun 17, 2011 03:16 PM
pragyan ojha should be given chance and would have made the difference.
Yusuf pathan played like he was playing for opposite side, sharing their towel, chatting
with them. Pathan showed to WI what we had mentioned to team India that Dhawan should have
nudging the ball up over the slip rather than flashing. Pathan did the nudge up once for
4 and then he flashed just like dhawan. Leaving a valuable clue to WI as to how they will
play indian Pace. Seemed like treachery and betrayal of selectors trust.
It is impossible to have someone of orthodox faith person playing for India (who could give priority to promote religion over and above team India) when we face teams such as Pakistan, WI, etc.
He might give 100% against ghora-european teams if ghora don`t play mind games with othodox players as they did for 26-11 tasavur rana, headley, etc.
======= Re: Raina Fixer
yes, raina was flashing without any patience or timing. IF HE REALLY WANTED TO hit above players, he could have taken power play so chances of getting caught for him are less.
afterall, Yusuf would have done well for india if not for KKR owner SRK's al-taquiya influence.
SRK gave special awards to Yusuf, Lee, kallis and Akram. So SRK was trying to nudge an separate alliance over and above indians using indian money.
SRK-etc has done the same sorts over hHarami women in Bollywood. People like SRK if they lived in pakistan would be cleaning toilets
Re: Bad selection for last match.
by D S on Jun 17, 2011 03:21 PM
correction - Raina was playing in hurry, he showed no patience mostly because burden of captaincy and
videsh coach or NO pat from someone senior to calm him and guide him.
Re: Bad selection for last match.
by D S on Jun 17, 2011 03:23 PM
correction - Raina was playing in hurry, he showed no patience mostly because burden of captaincy and
videsh coach or NO pat from someone senior to calm him and guide him.
BCCI is correct, the COP and the THIEF both use the same technology because they are the same. So the tracking ball technology that is used to see Action replay (COP) is based on the same tracking technology as the DRS (hot spot and snickometer) which is the THIEF .
Look at the manipulations by ghoras. All the complaints MADE BY TV commentator about wrong decision is based on DRS technology that they show on TV. They are simulating the ball using DRS based technology. So how cleverly angrez are manipulating views. it is like EVMS, for demo it will all look good and in the back things can be changed.
Remember how angrez manipulated partition using Indians on basis of religion by using indians of 2 religion.
Solution - AT THE MOST , WE CAN ALLOW UMPIRE TO SEE THE ACTION REPLAY IN HDTV based on current japanese system available in market(exactly what people see), but say NO TO DRS because the base technology can be tempered, calibrated or manipulated like current process of EVMs. Lot of ghoras are taking performance enhancing drugs, this is what ICC is not checking.
Even the Umpire who are bribed or have allegiance to ghoras support DRS will make wrong decisions in matches on purpose such as to force DRS, but BCCI should endorse ACTION REPLY ON HDTV as the way for referral.
Re: drs - problem and solution
by D S on Jun 17, 2011 03:01 PM
reminds me how india-pak-etc use same base military technology made by videshi block that have base understanding/agreements with one another to keep nations like india-pak-etc dependent and behind on their tails. FIRSTLY in current arrangement, these nations such as india-pak-etc will never stop buying the weapons at exorbitant price because videshis blocks own the base technology. Secondly, videshi will never stop upgrading and keep the latest features to themselves without publishing them. thirdly, videshi will know all defects and means to bust/destroy their own technology so india-pak-etc cannot win over them. forty, deshi will become hand to mouth beggars of videsh. this is not just military. videshi are doing the same in retail, energy and even food security so on because indians are sold to videshi plans.
And thus there is rising inflation. videshi already made sardarji-etc open up economy or liberalize. And thus put it on sale directly to videshi and the desi brokers of videshi technology such as reliance, airtel, infosys-wipro (use videshi Operating system, software, hardware,etc), bureaucrats, politicians, etc.
Re: Re: drs - problem and solution
by D S on Jun 17, 2011 03:12 PM
Or, One of these nations will be given those weapons for free as aid, forcing the rest to buy.
On any day Saha is better WC than Patel.Saha is india's best WC, even better than Dhoni now. But Parthiv is in good batting form.He should be comparaed with Dhawan,Rohit,Kohli,Tiwary,Pathan etc. Even Kartick's batting is better than Patel. For selecting WC, it is to be decided if batting or keeping be given importance.
Re: India
by bharatpremi on Jun 17, 2011 02:31 PM
Do not ever talk about sachin's retirement.That is an act of sin in indian cricket.If he wishes he can play for another 22 years and board will allow him to play selectively as per his choice.
Re: Re: India
by ASHISH KUMAR on Jun 19, 2011 12:31 PM
If ordinary like dhoni is allowed to play even after 30 consecutive failures- yes sachin desrve to play even for 20 yrs as he will never fail so many time with bat
