Discussion Board

ICC Greatest Test Team is a joke: Stewart


Total 238 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Abhijit
Without Mathew Haydon
by Abhijit on Jul 19, 2011 07:15 PM  | Hide replies

no world 11 is possible.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
trivandrum padmanabhan
Re: Without Mathew Haydon
by trivandrum padmanabhan on Jul 19, 2011 07:23 PM
To an extend correct.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
surya das
My World XI team
by surya das on Jul 19, 2011 06:45 PM  | Hide replies

Openers :

Jack Hobbs
Sunil Gavaskar

Middle Order
Don Bradman
Sachin Tendulkar
Viv Richards

All Rounder
Garry Sobers

Wicket Keeper

Gilcrist

Fast bowlers
Danis Lillee
Malcolm Marshall
Wasim Akram

Spin bowler

Shane Warne

12th Man
Richard Hardlee

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RAJAN MHAMAI
Re: My World XI team
by RAJAN MHAMAI on Jul 19, 2011 07:23 PM
Apart from the wicket keeper, i have to agree with this selection. Alan Knott/ Kirmani were much better than Gilchrist. His own predeccesor ,Ian Healy, was a good glovemen, too.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
msgblogger
Re: My World XI team
by msgblogger on Jul 19, 2011 08:30 PM
Except for gilly ..this looks pretty good.Probably this wud have been the eleven if we Indians were barred from the poll :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RAJAN MHAMAI
Re: Re: My World XI team
by RAJAN MHAMAI on Jul 19, 2011 08:47 PM
Well, Gavaskar and Tendulkar would be good enough to get into the Worl 11.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
ACHINTA ROY
Performance based
by ACHINTA ROY on Jul 19, 2011 06:42 PM  | Hide replies

The team was selected on the basis of overall success. Hence, Viv Richards was not selected. Instead Lara was selected. Hence, Kapil was selected over Richard Hadlee as an all rounder. Similar reasons are applicable in respect of the other selections. Hence, some legendary pacers were left out. Who can think of replacing Veeru and Sachin when success rate is considered? ICC has to consider success rate only and it can not give importance to nostalgic or mythical considerations.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sourav Ganguly
Re: Performance based
by Sourav Ganguly on Jul 19, 2011 06:52 PM
what about Ambrose?//

   Forward   |   Report abuse
TruthisBitter
Re: Re: Performance based
by TruthisBitter on Jul 19, 2011 07:14 PM
Wt abt Sourav Ganguly??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sachin kulkarni
Re: Re: Re: Performance based
by sachin kulkarni on Jul 19, 2011 08:19 PM
bangali never give up bangalis, check out if he is really worth dude. Here were debating on super great players, and not the great players.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Muhammed
Re: I AGREE WITH ALEC
by Muhammed on Jul 19, 2011 06:27 PM
Publish this as well, 90% of people who voted were Indians!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Zero h
Re: Re: I AGREE WITH ALEC
by Zero h on Jul 19, 2011 06:35 PM
and only Indians have computer and internet connection..!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
surya das
Re: Re: Re: I AGREE WITH ALEC
by surya das on Jul 19, 2011 06:37 PM
Does any1 stopped Paki to vote.. or u mean to say all Paki were busy to making b00m..to celebrate every friday

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sourya biswas
Mine...
by sourya biswas on Jul 19, 2011 06:10 PM  | Hide replies

With so many lists floating around, here's mine:

1. Gavaskar
2. Trumper
3. Bradman (C)
4. Kallis
5. Sobers
6. Marsh (W)
7. Warne
8. Hadlee
9. Lillee
10.Holding
11.Marshall

12.Tendulkar

    Forward  |  Report abuse
rsjr
Re: Mine...
by rsjr on Jul 19, 2011 06:13 PM
Great team. You are very knowledgeable. Only I cannot look beyond Gilchrist for the impact he brings with his batting. Perhaps add Richards for Kallis. I like your choice of Victor Trumper and your choice of Sachin as 12th man :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rsjr
Re: Re: Mine...
by rsjr on Jul 19, 2011 06:16 PM
In addition, I would like to adjust the batting order. Marshall was a very superior bat if you have seen him bat, so he will be my choice for #8 and Hadlee at #7 with Warne taking #9 followed by Holding who could hit sixes at will.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aussie fan
Somerset
by aussie fan on Jul 19, 2011 06:03 PM  | Hide replies

ne,india,ko,dhul,chata,di,practise,match,mein,ab,poori,team,bhagwan,bharose,bhaithi,hain

    Forward  |  Report abuse
dogvijay singh
Re: Somerset
by dogvijay singh on Jul 19, 2011 06:07 PM
see this is my true porki vote bank !!! welcome son.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aussie fan
eng bolwers
by aussie fan on Jul 19, 2011 06:01 PM  | Hide replies

Broad..Anderson..Finn..Bresnan..Tremlett..Swann

compared with indian club standard bowlers

Zaheer..Ishant..Praveen..Sreesanth..Munaf..bhajjji

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
nice guy
why to waste time on Dream teams
by nice guy on Jul 19, 2011 06:00 PM

concentrate on real teams


    Forward  |  Report abuse
aussie fan
i think
by aussie fan on Jul 19, 2011 05:54 PM  | Hide replies

eng is better than india in this test and they will beat india by 3-0 margin atleast

    Forward  |  Report abuse
aussie fan
Re: i think
by aussie fan on Jul 19, 2011 05:56 PM
hail aussies hail ponting

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jaya S
Re: i think
by Jaya S on Jul 19, 2011 05:56 PM
England will not win. BCCI has already taken care of the result just as they did with the WC Semis and Finals.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Zero h
Re: Re: i think
by Zero h on Jul 19, 2011 06:01 PM
sohail pakistani, you are back! welcome...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Deepak Darira
Re: Re: i think
by Deepak Darira on Jul 19, 2011 06:01 PM
And BCCI has forwarded the SMS to you!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aussie fan
Re: Re: i think
by aussie fan on Jul 19, 2011 05:59 PM
no idea abt BCCI's role here,but if england play to their potential there are certain winners without any doubt because they players are much more better than us..!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Zero h
Re: Re: Re: i think
by Zero h on Jul 19, 2011 06:29 PM
us = aussies, I guess

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rsjr
My XI refined
by rsjr on Jul 19, 2011 05:50 PM  | Hide replies

My probable XI: (replaced Botham with Sobers)

1. Jack Hobbs
2. Gavaskar - ack. as having the best technique
3. Bradman - Nobody disputes his inclusion
4. Richards - King of batsmen
5. Kallis - Best technique amongst batsmen of current generation
6. G Pollock
7. Gilchrist - Everybody's choice
8. Sobers - Most versatile all-rounder ever
9. Akram - Best leftie alongwith Davidson
10.Marshall - Most fearsome fast bowler ever and a very good lower order batsman
11. Warne - The one and only
12th man: Sachin or Botham (I would go for Botham for his ability to perform on the big stage)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
sourya biswas
Re: My XI refined
by sourya biswas on Jul 19, 2011 06:13 PM
Not a bad list. Here's mine:

1. Gavaskar
2. Trumper
3. Bradman (C)
4. Kallis
5. Sobers
6. Marsh (W)
7. Warne
8. Lillee
9. Hadlee
10.Holding
11.Marshall

12.Tendulkar

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rambo only
Re: My XI refined
by rambo only on Jul 19, 2011 06:04 PM

Aaakrrraam ???

Ahead of :
Holding, Griffith, Lillee, Garner, Lindwall ??

I think even Bob Willis was better than Aaakrraam .

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 238 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message