Discussion Board

Umpire Decision Review: The players' point of view


Total 43 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Shashank Rachagundla
UDRS
by Shashank Rachagundla on Oct 28, 2010 10:26 AM

If run outs can be referred to third umpire why not the inside edges or caught behinds or lbw's.....Indians did not know how to use it last time ;)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
rohit chauhan
Its not needed that much
by rohit chauhan on Oct 27, 2010 06:08 AM

ICC should try a different approach. If Steve Bucknor is the umpire, use it. Else the host country decides.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Kishor Patil
what zaheer says is correct......
by Kishor Patil on Oct 26, 2010 10:11 AM  | Hide replies

"If any technology has to be used, it has to be the responsibility of an umpire," says Zaheer, adding, "They should be in the position to use it if need be." it should not be for the teams bowling / batting.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sarangarajan TS
Re: what zaheer says is correct......
by Sarangarajan TS on Nov 30, 2010 10:13 PM
UDRS is OK in principle but not in practice.Limiting each team only to two successful referals in each innings is absurd as it supposes that umpires are entitled to make two mistakes in each innings per team. If any one is sincere in using technology, they should take out the decision to refer to technology from the on filed captains and this should rest with the match referee and third umpire. On several occasions ,deliveries pitched outside the leg stump and going over the stumps had been blatantly given out and seen on the replays. Now umpires can recall batsman who had been declared out by the same umpire on the suspicion of 'no-balls". If this could be done, why not the "pitched outside leg stump /over the stump and ‘bat and pad catches' be left to the third umpire an match referees?

As far as the technology is concerned, the usage of it is limited to the broadcasting crew and their manipulations. In the recently concluded Ashes test, snicko meter clearly showed a tickle from an Aussy batsman but was not shown to the third umpire in time and was declared "not out" After the decision was given in favour of the batsman, the crew showed the tickometer much later. Why? Why not the tickometer considered as evidence? So let us not just jump to conclusions. Dhoni and Sachin have some reservations and they are entitled to it and they must have taken it on experience. Sachin says gently that it should be co

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rachna v
India denying UDRS for fixing
by rachna v on Oct 26, 2010 09:52 AM  | Hide replies

Indians are denying the UDRS system because they pump money to umpires to give decision in thier favour. As long as India rules the world cricket, UDRS will not be implemented.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
S Shrikanth
Re: India denying UDRS for fixing
by S Shrikanth on Oct 26, 2010 02:04 PM
Frankly speaking Indian Cricket team is scared of UDRS. But Our other sports teams like Hockey are not.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vicky Devil
Re: India denying UDRS for fixing
by Vicky Devil on Oct 26, 2010 12:31 PM
Hahaha...Good try from our neighbors to print something on the name of Indians... If what you said is correct, the World Cup should have been ours always :P

   Forward   |   Report abuse
inder
What exactly wrong with UDRS
by inder on Oct 26, 2010 01:09 AM  | Hide replies

I still don't know what is wrong with technology. Article could have pointed out some instances where the technology was incorrect or some explanation of technical issues that cause the system to be wrong.

All we can get from the article is that some players are not happy with UDRS without understanding why.

A poor job of journalism.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Kishor Patil
Re: What exactly wrong with UDRS
by Kishor Patil on Oct 26, 2010 10:13 AM
someone seeing the technology on TV cannt say whether its right / wrong decision. only players with more experience can say about it

   Forward   |   Report abuse
prakash bose
ponting's right
by prakash bose on Oct 25, 2010 11:27 PM  | Hide replies

ponting's right here...correct decision will be made more often than not...compared to without udrs...esp for caught behind / batpad etc....moreover it makes the game interesting with limit of 3 referals....indians are just crybabies..coz they survive mostly becoz of umpires wrong decisions...esp. sachin...becoz he knows in india...very few umpires have the guts to give him LBW..in front of a partisan crowd...aldo indian spinners get most of their wickets through LBWs given under pressure by the umpires in india....

    Forward  |  Report abuse
richa
Re: ponting's right
by richa on Oct 26, 2010 09:50 AM
You are absolutely right Mr. Prakash, because if you will look at the INDIA-SRILANKA TEST SERIES then you will surely found that why indian's are against UDRS and your comment over sachin and other legendary batsmen of Flat wickets are absolutely justified in my views

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Kishor Patil
Re: ponting's right
by Kishor Patil on Oct 26, 2010 10:14 AM
what zaheer says is correct..."If any technology has to be used, it has to be the responsibility of an umpire," says Zaheer, adding, "They should be in the position to use it if need be."

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Krishnadeep Kar
Re: ponting's right
by Krishnadeep Kar on Oct 26, 2010 09:36 AM
MR. BOSE,SORRY TO SAY THAT U HAVE VERY LESS KNOWLEDGE ABOUT CRICKET,ESPECIALLY INDIAN CRICKET,LOLZ!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sunder iyer
Re: ponting's right
by sunder iyer on Oct 25, 2010 11:45 PM
If India opposes what is pro fair play it should not cry foul for wrong decisions and should never blame the umpires even when decisions are blatant

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Azzrooddin
India should oppose UDRS
by Azzrooddin on Oct 25, 2010 10:57 PM

along with all Asian countries. They should get the taste of their own medicine.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
buzzer
BREAKING NEWS !!!!
by buzzer on Oct 25, 2010 03:48 PM

Australia have appointed Venkatesh Prasad as the bowling coach. Venkatesh Prasad was sacked by BCCI as bowling coach in 2009. After that the Indian bowling has only weakened. And new talent is coming very slowly.

Now Venkatesh Prasad's talent is being recognised elsewhere. He will be mainly responsible to teach Australian bowlers to reverse swing which they find difficult.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 43 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Write a message