You should have bowled the no ball in such a manner as one baller bowls without intension and you should have bowled the no ball with a little margin, then the issue not have been raised so much. Be a true cricketer and don't listen to any body's suggestion.
Dear Sehwag, What you were doing wen Randiv bowled 2 balls normal when the score was level at 170 and you were on 99. Blaming the forth ball as no ball deliberate , even if so, does not add to your honour. Rather you sould feel sorry for raking up the issue. If somebody else would have raised the issue, then there could ave been some honour. Anyway, it is my humble message, you can still feel sorry and twitter it and regain your honour
Re: Sehwag ton denial
by Sameer on Aug 20, 2010 01:23 PM
if every delivery could be scored off, then every team would be scoring 500 runs .. I feel sorry that you don't understand cricket.
Re: Re: Re: Sehwag ton denial
by Doraswamy Krishnamoorthy on Aug 22, 2010 02:06 PM
why dhoni did not speak even a word on the issue? Because he was so sure and clear that Sehwag could have scored a single on any one of the ball and got his centuray. Let Sehwag himself deny the fact that he could not score. understanding cricket etc. is a faltu comment, anyway it does not matter as it is only affecting me .
Re: Sehwag 99
by Soumitra Mukherjee on Aug 19, 2010 03:16 PM
Who the F... r u to tell Viru to F... Off? Just like ur cricketers, u lack sportsamnship too. We drew the test series at your home, and we are ahead of you in both ODI rankings. So I think u can F...Off.
In That match Srilankan player showing any sporsman ship? That is the very afraideble they did. it not a single time happen, its 3rd time agains India. ICC have doing something for this acts and also provide rules for this such condition.
Re: Sportsman ship...
by krishna on Aug 19, 2010 10:58 PM
please list the 3 occurences... kaif scored a boundary to prevent Ganguly from getting his century, Kartik was the batsmen when Malinga bowled the 5 wides... so this is the only one.
As such ODI favors the batsman - the day will come when a bowler may get penalised for bowling a unplayable ball. worse the batsman, ICC and the fans will call it unsportman like conduct. If Viru's century did not depend on the ball no one would care...
Dear Sangakara, This one is not the fair play of criket.U can't prevent INDIANS to win the match on field U can do only what you have done for personal records by cunningness.
Now, everybody had imagined the importance of 1 run, a century and plying for self records. If Sehwag is not plying for records, then why we are worry about that? Why every time we are blaming SRT that he is playing for self records?
