I think, Lalit Modi used his "links" to plant a bomb near the stadium, so that he gets a reason to shift the venue of his choice. If Terrorists had planted the bomb, couple of things are unclear: 1) Why did not any terrorist group take the responsibility? 2)If terrorists planted the bomb, they would do something big? Not these Diwali Crackers.
Re: I think Lalit Modi Planted the Bomb.
by Sameer on Apr 19, 2010 11:00 AM
so wait .. when deccan mujahideen took responsibility of the act did we not investigate the matter and pointed finger to laskar etc ? I mean, how difficult is it to make an anonymous call that " the bomb was planted by say bangalore mujahideen?" All this responsibility etc accounts for squat, apart from some epeen excercise.
Re: Funny Fella
by Ram Chauthariya on Apr 19, 2010 12:46 AM
Yesterday Muslims killed fellow Muslim refugees in Pakistan in the most brutal way - 41 blown up
IS MR RAJIV SHUKLA,PLAYING POLITICAL GAME? IS IT CONGRESS VS BJP? WHY POLICE COMMISSIONER NAME IS DRAGGED TO SHIFT THE VENUE OF SEMIFINAL VENUE? SHUKLAJI PLS DO ONE THING ,EITHER BE SPORTS ADMINISTRATOR OR BE IN POLITICS. IS MUMBAI IS SAFE AS COMPARED TO BANGALORE. U PEOPLE ARE NOT DOING ANYTHING RATHER THAN MAKING THOSE ELEMENTS MORE COURAGEOUS. THEY ARE PLAYING MIND GAMES. FORGET CONG AND BJP CONCENTRATE WITH CRICKET. IF U CANT BE SURE TO GO AHEAD WITH SAME VENUE,THEN PLS DONOT HOST WC2011: SHUKLAJI ,SHARADJI,JEITLEYJI ,BE SPORTSMAN NOT MAKE CRICKET A POLITICS GAME.
Re: Cheap politics
by Nikhil T on Apr 19, 2010 12:48 AM
Its business dude.. DY Patil stadium has highest capacity than any other in India (since its new stadium). they will earn more..
Re: Cheap politics
by Martina on Apr 19, 2010 10:28 AM
Its all phixed from the begining that Bombai will win this IPL-03, so obviously these dramas played out.
Re: Re: Cheap politics
by Sameer on Apr 19, 2010 11:04 AM
wait so its fixed that MI win this IPL ? Were you there when the deal was made ? We sure would like to get the proof on it.... oh wait , you weren't there. You are a born loser that believes that there was a conspiracy for your body being filled with FAILURE
I am from bangalore and still i support the decision to move ipl semis to mumbai. First of all our cops where not serious and now they are requesting to ignore a situation which everyone is terming as 'Minor' but if the boms would have exploded at 8 as planned then I reckon atleast double figure casualty would have occured.
This is a lesson to everyone. Take the job seriously else loose the responsibility. If they move semis to blore then there will be no value for the security lapse that occured.
Re: Re: Its a correct decision
by Nikhil T on Apr 19, 2010 12:49 AM
Because they will earn more from Navi Mumbai (its not Mumbai,, coz Brabourne stadium is smaller) . DY Patil is huge.. 70,000 seater
My question is why the security was not tight in the first place? how the bomb could reach the stadium? Why the cops are crying now, i think BCCI did the right thing is shifting the final match.
Re: Why the securty was not tight in the first place.
by cheguevera on Apr 19, 2010 12:12 AM
to mumbai??...thats funny!! seems like we have forgotten Nov 26, 2008!!
Re: Re: Why the securty was not tight in the first place.
by mssac on Apr 19, 2010 12:18 AM
dude blore is a recent incident..now dont take sick massacre of early 80's and tell delhi is not safe !
Re: Re: Re: Why the securty was not tight in the first place.
by Rajesh S on Apr 19, 2010 12:25 AM
Dude u r not able to read the intentions, any thing happens out side the stadum and you blame POlice for that who were manning stadium. Do you really know the exact spots. Just for petty reasons you can not totally underestimate the security. How can you tell that Maharashtra is a safer place than Karnataka, just it is COn ruled. U r ...
Re: Re: Re: Why the securty was not tight in the first place.
by proud Indian on Apr 19, 2010 12:26 AM
yeah rite, we r afterall Indians, 1984 didnt occur 2002 didnt occur 7/11 didnt occur 26/11 didnt occur 17/04/2010 didnt occur we r Indians, we r resilient rnt we? any no. of attcaks will not deter us, keep killing us by bombs, we r resilient, my foot, we r resilient by force, not by choice
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why the securty was not tight in the first place.
by Rajesh S on Apr 19, 2010 12:29 AM
I agree Indian "we r resilient by force, not by choice". We are forced by educated fools like @mssac who does not know any thing even like what they had for yesterdasy dinner. For such fools entire sub continent is suffering.
As for as I am aware BCCI's contribution is BIG ZERO to India. Now it is bent upon taking out the image of security forces in INDIA. BCCI has become a spoilt club which needs immediate take over. How can BCCI a private club own Indian Criteck Team and paly with security forces. Just think it is pitching Maharashtra security forces against Karanataka security forces. It is totally against constitution of India. It is slowely sowing the seed for divide and rule or even the seed of disintegration of India. I love my India I say United We Stand, Identified we divide, Devided we loose. we need to show doors for BCCI where it is playing with the unity of India. I can write guge write up here but it is sufficient for one to understand BCCI Intentions and cracks of Unity.
