Even after winning World Cup 99 and 16 consecutive tests, Steve Waugh was stripped of the ODI captaincy and was dropped from the Australian ODI side permanently after just one bad VB series in 2002.
Do you thinl Ponting deserves the same fate, after continuous bad performance of the Aussie side in ODI and t20 formats since January 2008?
in present australia is no more world power in cricket. now india cn beat them anywher in the world. in past india had some prb bt now we r more stronger than kangaroos in any format of the game and cn beat them anywhere.
Re: Re: @pratik and pseudos
by deewaker pandey on Jun 09, 2009 02:58 PM
u mst b joking. hw did u cm 2 know abt manish? it wll take long time for australia to hit back.
If you think like this way then all matches are fixed and mind it many player of Team India are associate with Match Fixing including our honorable MP Mr. Mohd Azharuddin.
Re: Diwakar
by deewaker pandey on Jun 09, 2009 02:02 PM
well it has been proved tht azhar ws involved in match fixing n u dnt hv to repeat tht.bt if u find matches in australia then u wll c lot of example of poor umpiring against teams playing wid australia in australia. it cnt be bad luck only. its something intentional.
Re: Re: Re: Diwakar
by deewaker pandey on Jun 09, 2009 02:12 PM
pseudos, to argue wid me, u mst hv some valid point to tell. by talking nonsense u cnt discuss.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Diwakar
by Against Pseudos on Jun 10, 2009 05:11 AM
Pandey:
yeah.... whatever.... ;-)
So let me make some valid points and keep repeating them like a parrot (a la your ishtyle)....
India never won a world cup after 1983 fluke... India never won a world cup afer 1983 fluke.... India never won a world cup after 1983 fluke...
India cannot digest the Sydney defeat the way Australia handled the 2001 defeat and moved on to greater things.... India cannot digest the Sydney defeat the way Australia handled the 2001 defeat and moved on to greater things... India cannot digest the Sydney defeat the way Australia handled the 2001 defeat and moved on to greater things....
Now that I have parrotted some useless points in your ishtyle, you give me some valid point of yours.... :)
I distinctly remember the comments Ricky Ponting made about India and Pakistan getting knocked out of the last world cup in the first round by Bangaldesh and another minnow. He said "India and Pakistan didnt deserve to make it to the next round and he had no sympathies for either of these teams". Now that his time is kicked out, he says he doesnt know why they lost. What goes around comes around Ricky!! Enjoy the extra time to prepare for the ashes.
Re: Payback time Ricky
by Srinivas Mepula on Jun 09, 2009 01:53 PM
Vijay he was right, you should have seen the match, really they din't deserve....Ricky is bold and clear in his mind... he is not an hypocrite like lots of INDIANs and INDIAN players do!!!
Re: Re: Payback time Ricky
by deetee on Jun 09, 2009 02:50 PM
srinivas, oz are bad at t20, because there is not enough time to sledge players and cheat.
Re: Re: Payback time Ricky
by C W on Jun 09, 2009 02:00 PM
If he is bold and clear in his mind, why can't he admit now saying Aussie did not deserve to go to super 8 in this T20 world cup? He should also admit boldly that dropping Symonds was a mistake. He should admit that denying participation in IPL has cost Aussie team in this T20 world cup. Ponting should also admit that they are good in One day matches and Test matches coz they have enough time to sledge.
Can he admit all these facts? If not then he is the biggest hypocrite including you hiding behind the name "Srinivas Mepula".
Re: Re: Re: Payback time Ricky
by Against Pseudos on Jun 09, 2009 02:04 PM
C W:
There is no point arguing with you as you will never admit he is bold and clear..... :)
Dropping someone who boozes during day time maybe a mistake according to the BCCI, but I think it was a bold decision.... you might disagree coz winning is the most important thing for you... right?...
And thanx for admitting that they are the best in ODIs and Test Matches.... though you seem to believe that the Ojha style shouting and Ishant style glaring is responsible for their success.... go on belieiving that too.... :)
And thanx for showing us that you are not a hypocrite..... :)
Re: Re: Payback time Ricky
by C W on Jun 09, 2009 01:51 PM
Jus wondering hw much time u got? I get online whenever feel like takin a break from work. But seems like ur work is right up here! Are you paid by Aussies for this?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Payback time Ricky
by C W on Jun 09, 2009 02:03 PM
None, thats why I dont blog often. But it could be a possibility in your case coz I see ur spam for almost everything put up here...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Payback time Ricky
by Against Pseudos on Jun 09, 2009 02:05 PM
;-)..... And since you see "almost everything" put up here, I take it that you are being paid is also a distinct possibility?.... :)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Payback time Ricky
by C W on Jun 09, 2009 02:10 PM
Jus a little scroll whenever I get online shows all your spam... I think it makes a difference between seeing this in a flash and replying to every blog like a jobless maniac.
Sorry, give me your opinion about these matches. Champions trophy 2006. World Cup 2007. Australia and Pakistan in Abu dhabi-2009 Australia and New Zealand-2009 Australia and South africa(Test)-2009 How many umpires and players and cheaters.
Re: deewakar
by deewaker pandey on Jun 09, 2009 01:32 PM
i dont need to gv the numbers. but if u try to think then u will c that all those series australia hv lost,in most of them they did nt have support of umpires. whereas all those series they hv won, they got umpire support in most of them. do n r & d and come up wid exact figure then u will know the exact situation
Re: Re: deewakar
by Against Pseudos on Jun 09, 2009 01:43 PM
Pandey:
Your logic seems to be faultless.... :)
If they win, itz becoz of umpires.... if they lose then the opponents played superbly.... :)
Gr8... Maybe Nehra and Zaheer will take solace in that wallop they got during the 359/2 in 2003 finals; considering that all those sixes were actually catches in slips, signalled as Sixes by the cheating umpires.... :)
Re: Re: Re: deewakar
by deewaker pandey on Jun 09, 2009 01:59 PM
pseudos i would like 2 say u again-first read the comments carefully then speak. I used the word 'most of the' in my comments. u mst b understanding the word. frankly speaking - aussis r strong team bt umpire supports make them far more stronger. i accept in WC 2003 they played superbly bt more impotant is that -Indian bowler bowled badly in tht match. srinath gv 87 in 10, zaheer gv 67 in 7 n nehra too ws very expansive. these were the same bowler who bowled well against everyteam bt did all the mistakes agains australian team. so more than anything else it was bad cricket frm india. got it.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: deewakar
by deewaker pandey on Jun 09, 2009 02:14 PM
n u cnt live wid past performances. in present australia is no more world power in cricket. now india cn beat them anywher in the world. got it pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: deewakar
by Against Pseudos on Jun 10, 2009 05:17 AM
Pandey:
Yeah... I just looked up the official ICC rankings... they completely agree with you and have awarded India the permanent top spot for the next 250 years in ODIs, Tests, T20 (a new category they introduced on your behalf), plus world Number one in Double Wicket format, IPL format, ICL format, Olympics and the 50-50 World Cup too....
So I completely agree with you that for the next 250 years India is the best side that happened to the world of cricket..... ;-)
This is the time of change in ausies team.You remember in 2007 april team india also change and the result come in sept 2007.SO wait Team Australia must come back.
Re: divakar pandey.
by deewaker pandey on Jun 09, 2009 01:29 PM
u seems 2 b more exited then any other australian. in 2007, dravid n ganguly ws the 2 main player who went out frm ODI and last yr ganguly n kumble retired frm test cricket. no other major changes. bt i believe still australia have strong players bt they r unable to perform well. u could see lee is goin to 56 run in 4 over. ponting is unable to bat properly nw.similerly for other players. their time has gone. they wll hv 2 bring new player who r good at international level n it will take time. mind u.
Re: Re: divakar pandey.
by pratik nidhi bhardwaj. on Jun 09, 2009 01:53 PM
diwakar you are wrong most player player ranji and irani trophy.So they are more experience then heritz,clark and hussey
Re: Re: Re: divakar pandey.
by deewaker pandey on Jun 09, 2009 02:05 PM
did u understand simple english? if ys then read wht i hv spoken 2 u. did i compaired the experience of indian player wid aussis. dnt compair ranji trophy exp wid international experience. clark n hussey also play local cricket.
Cricket development is indirectly proprtional to (a) income levels/ economic prosperity. Look at Bombay (or Mumbai now). and (b) Interest in other activities
Look at West Indies. Jamaicans know much more about Asafa Powell and Usain Bolt than Chris Gayle.
Or look at our own Mumbai; it was the undisputed cricket capital till the early 1990s. Now it hardly supplies players for the indian XI. Gone are those days when India used to get its entire XI from just 4 cities Bombay, Banglaore, Delhi and Hyderabad. Guys from Mubai are making a lot of money. Anecdotally, Mumbaites are more worried abt Sensex than sex or cricket!
So, it is possible that Australia slowly decelerates and the space is filled by others. While this is possible, no country has clearly usurped Australia yet....certainly not India
Re: Aussies lost...so what?
by LG on Jun 09, 2009 01:29 PM
I do not understand your logic. Chris Gayle is no the best batsman in the world. Your comparison of him with Asafa Powell and Bolt--who are best in the world-is invalid.
Re: Re: Aussies lost...so what?
by vathula on Jun 09, 2009 01:46 PM
Vishy Anand is clearly the best chess player in the world. Indians know much more abt a lowly ranked cricketer than Anand...Do you agree? My point is abt people's interest.
Re: Re: Re: Aussies lost...so what?
by LG on Jun 09, 2009 03:30 PM
I partially agree with you. I still believe that any true sport-lover will know Anand. I do know him. If you are talking about people who watch sports without any ABC of sport may fall in the category you mentioned. These very people hype such ordinary cricketer.
Re: Dhoni and Harbhajan respect.
by LG on Jun 09, 2009 01:24 PM
If I were the BCCI head, I would have expelled Dobhi and harbhajan from playing any kinds of cricket for 2-3 years. It is as bad as match-fixing.
Give your comment carefully.You are opposing ausies team.If Ausies are stronger then dont criticise them.Hope they win 2010 20-20 World cup,when ireland and bangladesh are present in the group of australia.
Re: diwakar pandey
by deewaker pandey on Jun 09, 2009 01:20 PM
listen try to understand my comment first. try to understand the reason behind critisizing them. they r strong team ,I believe but they could nt showed it up. as an indian i will support my team in any circumstance, so y shd i support australia? i mst b happy that one more opponent of us has been kicked out and moreover they hv been kicked out by their own mistakes. also there r few cheaters in their team n they mst learn the lesson. i hopes they hv learned a lot that widout umpire support they r nt ahead of any other team.
Re: Re: diwakar pandey
by Against Pseudos on Jun 09, 2009 01:52 PM
Pandey:
Whatz this Umpires support umpires support thingy?.....
I am sick of hearing that everytime an Australian is caught behind, the umpire signals a six.... :-)
And no Indian has actually been dismissed ever since Ranjit Singh held the bat for the first time... its just those cheating umpires who are hellbent on seeing India lose every match.... :)
Can you come up to a level where we can discuss "cricket"?
Re: Re: Re: diwakar pandey
by deewaker pandey on Jun 09, 2009 02:10 PM
grow up pseudos. frm ur statement, it seems tht u r nt tryin 2 understand and only talkin n talkin nonsense. wht u wanna prove? india is nowhere around australia?? tell me. if ys then listen u r totally wrong. in past indian team had some prbs bt now they cn beat australia anywhere(widout support of umpire) :) australia is no longer world power in cricket. they wll hv to rebuild the team.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: diwakar pandey
by deewaker pandey on Jun 09, 2009 02:22 PM
its fact pseudos u need to accept that australia had umpire support in past. see u byee
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: diwakar pandey
by Against Pseudos on Jun 10, 2009 05:20 AM
Pandey:
Okay, I accept that Australia had umpire support in the past..... :)
That is the sole reason they won 3 world cups in a row, and dominated the world cricket with such a pathetic team that even the Shardashram under-11 year old team from Mumbai could have defeated with only a 4 player team....
I completely agree with whatever you have to say you know why?.... Becoz Bucknor made some glaring umpiring mistakes in the Sydney test, so in keeping with our traditional Indian values, everything that the Australians did right from Sir Donald Bradman onwards simply proves to us that they always won by cheating and umpiring support.... ;-)
Bandhu, you are a genius.... keep up the good work on this forum..... :)
