A LKG Team wins over UKG Team.... Its a big comedy.. Y BCCI sent the team to WI for this useless series? Nobody has the answer. Actually WI shd hav won the series. Rain played spoiled sport. I am sure that players like Badrinath and Murali Vijay are home made TIGERs. When they play at foreign soil, they fear and struggle. Hence they will be identified as CATs. The tournament itself is a comedy and boring one.
Re: Unconvincing victory
by Anurag Rathore on Jul 06, 2009 03:41 PM
Pak VS Srilanka series is even more bore. Srilanka is playing with their half strenght team.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Indian team for CT must be.......
by Anurag Rathore on Jul 06, 2009 03:24 PM
I think in batting there is no headeche for selectors, but in bowling they have so many options in fast bowling. Like Z.Khan, Sreesanth, Munaf, P.Kumar, RP, Ishant and P.Kumar, I.Pathan.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Indian team for CT must be.......
by bikas on Jul 06, 2009 03:33 PM
among these bowler 2-3 are always fitness problems so bowling selection not worry for selector worry is batting selection
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Indian team for CT must be.......
by deewaker pandey on Jul 06, 2009 03:29 PM
ya lot of options there bt no 1 is consistent. I think Nehra, munaf,Ishant, Z khan would b fast bowler. irfan/P kumar can b allrounder. RP cnt b threat for opposition. either munaf or ishant shd get the chance.
Re: Re: Indian team for CT must be.......
by Anurag Rathore on Jul 06, 2009 03:39 PM
What you think about Sreesanth? Should he get a chance in place of RP?
Re: Re: Re: Indian team for CT must be.......
by deewaker pandey on Jul 06, 2009 03:48 PM
he cn b gud bowler. bt he mst show performance b4 aggression. he always show agression n nt performance.
Above average- definitely nothing great to write about. WI is a mediocre team and to India's credit they won without the 3 key players viz., Sachin, Sehwag and Zaheer. But India's 2 wins lacked quality while WI won convincingly. By the way, Stats are about quantity....aren't they?! So, in the end, India- 2 WI- 1 that stands.
Re: India's performance rating
by Varun on Jul 06, 2009 02:38 PM
LOL. Really ?. Good to know. India won 2 matches and lost one match due to careless batting. Thats how i see it. Even with half strength team and majority of players having no previous exposure in WI, they won. To me that is a great performance.
Re: Re: Re: MSD
by Varun on Jul 06, 2009 02:39 PM
Dude india won 2 times regardless of rain and bad playing conditions. And yeah, against all doomsayers, lack of experience in WI and no super stars.
Re: Re: Re: Re: MSD
by ASHISH KUMAR on Jul 06, 2009 04:11 PM
If all match played up to 50 overs. Score could be WI(3), India(1) for sure. Even weak WI team was better than this useless Indian team. Dhobi will win one match with luck & start giving a big lecture like politician. In first 2 matches which was played total 50 overs , india was totally exposed. 1st one day WI lost as bravo was given out wrongly & in 2nd one day WI thrashed India.3rd one day was lucky one due to rain.
even if MSD scores 0 in 100 balls and India wins! and not so special if an individual scores 200 of 100 deliveries and India loses! the fact that MSD has led India to 6 bilateral series itself makes the man special!
Re: Its special
by Varun on Jul 06, 2009 02:41 PM
yeah. Kids still dont get it. To them a player has only one role and that is slam bang. No other roles needed in cricket.
Re: Re: Its special
by ASHISH KUMAR on Jul 06, 2009 04:31 PM
MSD team was thrashed in w cup. He will be thrashed in SA,AUS & England in any form of game if sachin/sehwag missing from team. Could manage few wins just because of luck, weak opposition & carry forward of momentum provided by dravid/Kumble.Only difference is dravid/kumble were not laloo so can't talk politics.
Re: Re: Re: Its special
by Varun on Jul 06, 2009 10:55 PM
His team was thrashed only in the WC. Nowhere else regardless of doomsday predictions for so long. Do you guys just love eating your own words ?. Seems like it.
