Aussie ppl and player believe in Racism and hence Ricky pointing can not "best since Bradman" coz they hv not played the matches in true spirit. Always doing conspiracy,behaving like crybaby, mind games, abusing other teams for no matter and other tantrums which they hv used for winning the games.
It is better to loose than to win by using above tactics. Ricky Pointing is not near even my colony or galliwala player.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Sir Don Bradman
by Sachin zindabad on Aug 04, 2009 03:28 PM
But u have called a galliwala player, Since you are wearing blinkers while discussing his talent I am forced to ask these questions :-)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Sir Don Bradman
by sati savitri on Aug 04, 2009 03:27 PM
the same as urs....hey I am discussing about his behaviour on and off the field and his statements about players and other teams.
Re: Re: Re: Not Sir Don Bradman
by Sachin zindabad on Aug 04, 2009 03:15 PM
Kapil Dev won only 1 world cup but he was gr8 player rather than galli player like Ricky Ponting :-)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Sir Don Bradman
by Forrest Gump on Aug 04, 2009 03:30 PM
this is a recurring and evolving process in australia....whichever batsman is in form they are labelled as the best...in the late 90s they said sachin is best, in early 2000s it was hayden followed by pietersen and ponting in the mid to late 2000s....aussies by their mentality like to keep moving on unlike indians who once they have narrowed down to sachin or gavaskar as the best will never budge from their positions....in my personal opinion, if u see last 2 decades(90s and 2000s) overall sachin comes out on top...but aussies rarely look at it from such long term angle......
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not Sir Don Bradman
by Sachin zindabad on Aug 04, 2009 03:33 PM
Yes since they always change their partners(WAGS) they also apply the same rule to their Cricketers :-)
Re: vinod kambli
by Bhasmasur Rakshas on Aug 04, 2009 03:01 PM
Then at the same rate and going by same logic, Ajit Agarkar was the fastest to reach 50 ODI wickets and his record puts him in the top 10 ODI bowlers of all time.......why do people then belittle him??
Tasmanian tiger is no doubt a great batsman but you can not compare him to bradman. There are 2 types of batters- 1.Bradman 2.Others. Let us not live in fools paradise. No one can be compared to legend.
Re: Ponting
by Bhasmasur Rakshas on Aug 04, 2009 02:42 PM
Bradman mainly played in the pre war era and mainly played against England...90% of his tests are against england...he was not tested in different conditions cos he either played in England or in australia....
Also, Bradman was not tested by high quality spin bowling which was so common in the post war era...
So, Bradman is a legend but had he played in the post war era against the best spinners and in different conditions, he might not have averaged 99.9........
