I heard cricket is a game of gentlemans. but I see only slaves playing the game. which cricket playing country had not been a slave to england??? are we paying a tribute to the master????????
Re: A gentleman's game, HUH!!!!!!!!!!!!
by pravin sarode on Sep 19, 2008 10:54 PM
slaves is very very correct word because i see traces of gladiator the game in which one of worrier is killed by winner in ancient roman kingdom. game is no more gentle man game is it cruel hit & run ?
'This is the victory of cricket as ICL are not doing anything wrong but only playing cricket," Kiran More said. true. playing icl is not like fixing matches as is being done by bcci in their tourneys with the help of icc. so no need to ban icl. icl is better than fixed matches of bcci.
'This is the victory of cricket as ICL are not doing anything wrong but only playing cricket," Kiran More said. true. playing icl is not like fixing matches as is being done by bcci in their tourneys with the help of icc. so no need to ban icl. icl is better than fixed matches of bcci.
BRAVO TO RANATUNGA! IN A SIMILAR MOVE IN INDIA, KAPIL DEV SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO RETURN TO BCCI. ICL WAS HIS BRAIN CHILD AND IPL WAS BORN CONSEQUENT TO ICL. HENCE KAPIL IS FTHER OF ICL AND IPL
Well done! Sri Lanka. I am from India and I support the Indian team wherever they go. But this banning of cricketers for earning their livelihood by BCCI is utterly ridiculous. Have they committed any crime by joining the ICL? Instead guys like Mohammed Asif play in the IPL and have all sorts of drug problems. Now, let's look at that angle and see what double standards the BCCI is setting.
Re: .
by chandrashekhar tulasigeri on Sep 19, 2008 10:05 PM
well one SCL,in your next move should allow these players to pley international matches.it is stupidity of BCCI to ban telents-sufferer is game.it is better to have multiple bordsin our contry and wile selecting team for international match consider players from all such bords- so we will have better international team and good bench strength.
