Discussion Board

Understanding the Australian


Total 300 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Sam
Wacky Aussie is back. He is using two IDs. Chris and Lotiya
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 04:42 AM  | Hide replies

Chris is back. Please don't respond to him.
He uses various names like Ishant Patnan, Nisha singh, raj, charlie, and many other names.
Today he is using Lotiya's name too.
Real Lotiya knows Hindi.
Lotiya himself exposed that Aussie by asking questions in Hindi.


    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Lotiya Pathan
RE:Wacky Aussie is back. He is using two IDs. Chris and Lotiya
by Lotiya Pathan on Jan 16, 2008 02:21 PM
Rubbish..you are a very confused man. Lotiya is NOT Chris. You have accused 20 people of being Chris you fool. Give it a break Sam, and I doubt that is your real name.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bihar Badshah
Aussies Media have not Learned
by Bihar Badshah on Jan 16, 2008 04:00 AM  | Hide replies

I was reading an interesting article "Harbhajan out as India cut to quick"
By Malcolm Conn
January 16, 2008

This guy has written:

1.WITH so much effort having taken place to ensure suspended spinner Harbhajan Singh would be able to continue playing, India is now on the verge of dumping him for the third Test in Perth.

2.Kumble has never really explained how Australia failed to play in the spirit of the game as they claimed a last-gasp victory in the second Test in Sydney.

3.Nor has the captain outlined his views on how his team should play given that India has been the worst-behaved team in the world over the past decade, with 43 players found guilty at disciplinary hearings. Australia has had 25.

My 2 Cents:

All the above 3 pointer shows how arrogant and rude they are..India was fighting for the racism charge and not the banning of Bhajji for 3 tests..which writer so conveniently skipped!

Regarding the second allegation..well the Whole World saw on the TV what level of cheat aussies cricketor's are, so Kumble felt not to further explain as it was so obviuos..

Third one, well all our ex greats have ridiculed that data as rubbish and the reason was indicated by the world's greatest ever opening batsman Gavaskar recently in his article..why brown man are mostly targetted..Cricket has been for long run by one race and so india which should be in the bottom of the list is at the top and Aussies the champions are 3 or 4th, Gavaskar has already said th

    Forward  |  Report abuse
chris
RE:Aussies Media have not Learned
by chris on Jan 16, 2008 04:07 AM
"he world's greatest ever opening batsman Gavaskar" - haha yeah, greatest ever lol

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bihar Badshah
RE:RE:Aussies Media have not Learned
by Bihar Badshah on Jan 16, 2008 04:23 AM
o yea, I remember how he scored against Thombson, Lillie, West Indian Pace batteries, Imran Khan, English fast bowlers, Mr Hadlee and tons of great bowlers..Unmatched in the history of world cricket..and that too against diferent opponents and different pitches, unlike so-called great like Bradman..Lets compare by facts and variuos parameters..You too will accept..

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
anirudha saha
RE:Aussies Media have not Learned
by anirudha saha on Jan 16, 2008 05:05 AM
has gavaskar ever played thompson? I am not too sure...against lillee and pascoe his record is not to gr8 either..his average in tht 80-81 series is only 19.67....Bradman is Bradman

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bihar Badshah
RE:Aussies Media have not Learned
by Bihar Badshah on Jan 16, 2008 06:08 AM
I am not comparing Bradman with Gavaskar as Sunil Gavaskar was the opening batsman, and all I said he was opener..His record against world best fast bowling country West Indies is not repeated yet..I think Don was a great batsmand, but when u have open pandora box, then all I have to say 99.9 is no big deal..If a batsman scores 200 runs in his first test and then later stops playing is average will be 200..You don't judge some with average..we have to see feilding condition then and various conditions he played..Don 99% played times against england which had just one bodyline bowler and some support bowler, unlike what GAVASKAR faced..just one country west indies had Holding, Roberts, Garner, Marshal, Walls and so many all were great in their own rights..so..he is all time greatest opener..He has good record against Lillle who like pointing cheated him when he was on 70 plus by apealing LWB for bat pad nick and was as always supported by the local aussies umpire..I think thompson was hype and sunny played against him..his hype was short lived..but he was better person then Lille..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
chris
RE:Aussies Media have not Learned
by chris on Jan 16, 2008 06:11 AM
lol, if you think so dude.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bihar Badshah
RE:RE:Aussies Media have not Learned
by Bihar Badshah on Jan 16, 2008 06:22 AM
Len Hutton's autobiography, 'Fifty Years in Cricket', where the virtuoso England opener writes: ''I have a feeling that if he (Gavaskar) had been born English or Australian, many of the better judges would have been tempted to bracket him with Bradman. Gavaskar is not as good as Bradman, but very close, which automatically puts him on the very highest class of batsmen of all time.''

Bradman had once said Gavaskar is like Ornament of the cricket..

Forward   |   Report abuse
Bihar Badshah
RE:Aussies Media have not Learned
by Bihar Badshah on Jan 16, 2008 06:38 AM
Ms Saha, Gavaskar has better record against West Indies which was Number team during those days and your greatness was tested against them..aussies were 3rd or 4th during that time..but since u asked some statistics here it is..(coursey google)

Gavaskar has Test hundreds in Brisbane, Perth, Melbourne, Adelaide and Sydney and against the likes of Jeff Thomson, Craig McDermott, Merv Hughes and Bruce Reid

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sam
RE:RE:Aussies Media have not Learned
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 08:31 AM
No need to talk to Chris.
He is rediff abuser. He uses multiple IDs. Mostly Indian and sometime english. He posts bad messages against India, Indian people, Indian media and rediff itself.
He also tries to say something against India pakistan. Also he posts a message. Then logs out and re-log in as Ishnat Patnan and praise chris's posting. Basically he chats with himself.
Saale ko jawaab hi mut do. Uske posting ko "abuse" report karo.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bihar Badshah
RE:Aussies Media have not Learned
by Bihar Badshah on Jan 16, 2008 08:35 AM
Gavaskar played 20 Test matches against the Aussies and scored a total of 1550 runs with an excellent batting average of 51.66. Mind you Aussies had their own upmire and sunny use to walk even when umpire were still debating on his nick to wicket keeper or not..had he choosen to stay he would have ended making his average 60..which is like 99 of Mr Bradman, who scored against just one country England..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bihar Badshah
RE:RE:Aussies Media have not Learned
by Bihar Badshah on Jan 16, 2008 08:43 AM
One last piece of stat, sorry but thought it was needed..Bradman had 29 centuries after 52 test, in era when fielding was like catching goose...After playing 60 Tests, Gavaskar had scored 22 centuries.. very little gap..and the standard of bowling was 100 times better..but we still respect your Bradman..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
chris
RE:Aussies Media have not Learned
by chris on Jan 16, 2008 04:35 AM
lol Bradman vs Gavaskar, you're really that moronic?

Here, I'll start and end the debate. 99.9

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Bihar Badshah
RE:RE:Aussies Media have not Learned
by Bihar Badshah on Jan 16, 2008 06:14 AM
Geoffrey Boycott, Zaheer Abbas, Glenn Turner, Greg Chappell and Vivian Richards were more or less his contemporaries but none evoked such respect as Gavaskar. Richards was more authoritative but Gavaskar's consistency was in an altogether different class.

That he was an opener and unlike other great batsmen, he had to face the initial spells and the mostly deadly bowlers through out his career makes Gavaskar's feats astonishing.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sam
RE:Aussies Media have not Learned
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 04:48 AM
Aussie, nisha singh, charlie, Ishant Patnan, and what not... don't you have a life?
What you are doing on Indian site?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Sam
Alert... Wacky Australian is back, Chris
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 03:33 AM  | Hide replies

Chris is back. Please don't respond to him.
He uses various names like Ishant Patnan, Nisha singh, raj, charlie, and many other names.
He just want that Indian starts arguing with the other Indian.
He will not succeed. I'm sure now he will log in as another user and will response back that "Chris" is a good guy.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
chris
RE:Alert... Wacky Australian is back, Chris
by chris on Jan 16, 2008 04:04 AM
I use only one name, this is it, why would I bother using any other name? Completely unnecessary hassle with no point. And why would I pretend to be Indian =/, and why would you fools arguing amongst yourselves affect me in anyway? Weird strange little people you are.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Lotiya Pathan
RE:Alert... Wacky Australian is back, Chris
by Lotiya Pathan on Jan 16, 2008 04:20 AM
Hey Sam, I enjoy reading Chris' posts. I don't often agree with them but he is by far the most amusing poster on here. p.s Rediff is much better than the pakistani blogs.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sam
RE:Alert... Wacky Australian is back, Chris
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 04:50 AM
real Lotya will never say anything about India-Pakistan. You liar Aussie. A common Aussie man is such big liar.. No wonder Aussie players are big liars.

Such hai ki nahi? Batao.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
chris
RE:Alert... Wacky Australian is back, Chris
by chris on Jan 16, 2008 05:09 AM
I have not lied on this forum.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
chris
RE:Alert... Wacky Australian is back, Chris
by chris on Jan 16, 2008 04:24 AM
Then you arn't right very often.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sam
RE:Alert... Wacky Australian is back, Chris
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 04:33 AM
There is one Aussie on this board who uses names like Chris, Ishant, raj, etc. he even use the name Lotiya. So you are the one!!! Real Lotiya Pathan knows hindi.
Today real Lotiya is not on the board. You are posting using his name.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
chris
RE:Alert... Wacky Australian is back, Chris
by chris on Jan 16, 2008 05:11 AM
Leave me out of your little retard fight the pair of you.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sam
RE:Alert... Wacky Australian is back, Chris
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 05:23 AM
Hey liar Chris,
You are the one who changes identity and then uses Lotiya's name as alibi.
Where is Lotiya now? Logged out and logged as Chris?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
chris
RE:Alert... Wacky Australian is back, Chris
by chris on Jan 16, 2008 05:50 AM
If you say so Sam. You are Sam!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sam
RE:RE:Alert... Wacky Australian is back, Chris
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 08:40 AM
get lost Aussie. We do not want you here.
You are liar, cheater, abuser, free lunch eater, exaclty like a real Australian.
Get lost Chris.

Forward   |   Report abuse
Lotiya Pathan
RE:Alert... Wacky Australian is back, Chris
by Lotiya Pathan on Jan 16, 2008 06:40 AM
Sam= ??????????? I'm confused.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sam
RE:Alert... Wacky Australian is back, Chris
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 08:36 AM
Real Lotiya Pathan knows hindi. He is very nice person.
Earlier today Chris used his name so I made that comment.

Aap real Lotiya ho to mera pyaar bhara salam.

Forward   |   Report abuse
Lotiya Pathan
RE:RE:Alert... Wacky Australian is back, Chris
by Lotiya Pathan on Jan 16, 2008 02:16 PM
sam is a crazy indian Chris...he isn't very smart...i think everyone just ignores him.

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
JM
RE:Some gems of this article.
by JM on Jan 16, 2008 03:23 AM
"There's a reason you only exist in the rediff peanut gallery".

You read it didnt you? and you also cared to comment on it, many times. What a bunch of, in your "mate-ship" language, "wankers"!


   Forward   |   Report abuse
chris
RE:RE:Some gems of this article.
by chris on Jan 16, 2008 04:00 AM
This place is great entertainment, why not read it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sam
RE:Some gems of this article.
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 03:25 AM
Ok guys Ishan Patnan is back.
This time he is using then name "Chris".
He just want to stirr the pot and hope Indians starts arguing among themselves. We will not. Indians are much smarter than that.

Just ignore his post. Don't respond to this Australian. If he is an Indian he will understand following:
- Aaapki mataji konse rajya ki hai, Aaap aub tuk soye nahi?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
chris
RE:Some gems of this article.
by chris on Jan 16, 2008 04:03 AM
I could care less about you people arguing amongst yourselves, but you all lack the knowledge to argue with me.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Sam
RE:RE:Some gems of this article.
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 04:33 AM
There is one Aussie on this board who uses names like Chris, Ishant, raj, etc. he even use the name Lotiya. So you are the one!!! Real Lotiya Pathan knows hindi.
Today real Lotiya is not on the board. You are posting using his name.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Ishant Patnan
RE:Some gems of this article.
by Ishant Patnan on Jan 16, 2008 06:51 AM
can you guys just stop this. No-one knows who people are now. I know of 3 Lotiya's posting on here now....and I am genuine so don't even think of accusing me

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
dinesh prasad
Whatever
by dinesh prasad on Jan 16, 2008 03:08 AM  | Hide replies

Not really a great article.Regarding Kambli, he himself said that his caste was the reason he wasn't able to shine beyond what he could .So sridharan cribbing about Aussie media's caste connotation doesn't make any sense since Kambli himself made that statement.

I am sure I can trust kambli more than sridharan about kambli's concerns. Also this article somehow seems to suggest the 'uprightness' of Indians while not mentioning it explicity or rather taking a dig at that of Aussie's. Not true.We all know the 'uprightness' of Indians.Corruption everywhere,dishonesty .

MAybe he is simple trying to nitpick Aussie.For all we know they might be just like us in a different skin color.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
JM
RE:Whatever
by JM on Jan 16, 2008 03:27 AM

Kambli said that only after he was dropped.
If you didnt care about India, why not change your name? And why come here to read and then write crap?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
dinesh prasad
RE:Whatever
by dinesh prasad on Jan 16, 2008 03:40 AM
So you think penning down a few words here in favour of this mediocre article is 'caring ' for India ?

First, get an education so that you can comprehend and then 'critique' anything.
Second,get a life.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sam
RE:Whatever
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 05:11 AM
Wanker Aussie,
You do not belong here. Go home and get education. India is beautiful and more tolerable country.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
JM
RE:RE:Whatever
by JM on Jan 16, 2008 06:48 AM
Sure, I will learn about education from a 3rd class pass Indian-Aussie who is in a 3rd rated western country because he was not good enough to be in US or UK.

And jackass, "...and then critique anything" isn't the most "educated" sentence I have seen.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Sam
Ishant Patnan is Aussie, Using an Indian ID.
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 01:45 AM  | Hide replies

Guys don't bother to respond to Ishant Patnan He is from third world country Australia.
He mostly uses an Indian ID. Sometime he uses some english name too.

Good thing is that he do not understand Hindi so you can easily spot him. When in doubt, just send him couple hindi lines. If he don't understand then just ignore him.

He uses different names and post messages against India, Indian people, Indian media, and rediff.
He does this *every* day on rediff.
On other board couple hours ago he was using "Nisha Singh". Rediff spotted him and deleted all his messages.

Also he uses second ID to support the messages posted by first ID, and sometime he gives bad words to himself using the second ID. That proves that he is a Aussie character.
This guys says he likes to laugh at Indian people, their thoughts, and their sentiments.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Lotiya Pathan
RE:Ishant Patnan is Aussie, Using an Indian ID.
by Lotiya Pathan on Jan 16, 2008 04:15 AM
I thik that you are wrong here Sam. Ishant is a very intelligent poster. I have never seen him swear or say anything derogatory. It looks like he started the thread on this article and I find all of his contributions to be fair, some are a bit one-sided but he is not a problem. He states that he is an Indian born Australian.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sam
RE:RE:Ishant Patnan is Aussie, Using an Indian ID.
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 05:09 AM
Aussie looks like something is burning very hard. I can smell it. Real Lotiya exposed you yestreday. He knows Hindi and he started asking you question in Hindi.
As you mentioned yesterday you are talking to "yourself" using two IDs. Funny :-)
Your goal is to make fun of Indians but apperantly we are enjoying your behavior.
Now we understand Ponting is living with liars so he do the same.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vishnu Sharma
Check out an AUSSIE MAGAZINE called Paradox.
by Vishnu Sharma on Jan 16, 2008 01:26 AM

The introduction says:
Welcome to Paradox, the magazine of the Melbourne University Mathematical Society.

Its editor happens to be an Indian
Chaitanya Rao. or Chinese.

Never an aussie. These scum cannot count beyond hundred.

In the final analysis it is Indian professors who trying their level best to educate these "Ex Convicts and sons of whores".

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Vishnu Sharma
Excellent Article which highlights the fatuousness and emptiness of the averge Aussie.
by Vishnu Sharma on Jan 16, 2008 01:19 AM

Such people such as the Aussies are destined to perish.

I hope it happens soon.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
GS
To Mr.Ishant and all those Aus born Indians
by GS on Jan 15, 2008 08:17 PM  | Hide replies

Folks,i'm sorry to say that your brains are masked.I'm not arguing for those supporting India in a rude manner in this forum but i wanted to mention this after seeing your messages.Just becos u have been amazed with the infrastructure n all those stuffs that comes with a developed country u think u r blessed.We all appreciate the good gesture of the aussies in ur streets when they sport a smile at u and i also enjoy working with aussie colleagues (im not in Aus) and everyone knows what India is.Whatever it maybe,it is still the root for your family tree and source of your talent,don't forget that.U n ur children wud be seen differently by your own aussies when there is a test for their nervesn character. Particularily for indians settled abroad the attitude of abusing india once they r in a foreign land is more than anyother.Remember,indian origin people all over the world still have dual identity though they dropped indian citizenship and history says that your new identity doesn't always mean you are accepted by your new country
So be aware before doing a showoff infront of your aussie mates in speaking against your motherland you would endup spitting on your own face.by doing so u r also abusing your own family indirectly. hope u guys understand

    Forward  |  Report abuse
dinesh prasad
RE:To Mr.Ishant and all those Aus born Indians
by dinesh prasad on Jan 16, 2008 02:27 AM
While I don't disagree with what you say,by and large, let me correct you on one thing though. It is not like Indians who go abroad 'abuse' or like to abuse India. Being inside India we live in our respective states[which has been changing in the last 4-5 years due to IT etc] .That situation is similar to a frog in the well. No matter how good or bad the well is, it's perspective is still contained by the well.

Once you get out of that well for whatever reasons,temporarily or permanantely, you would have seen a few more or atleast one more well.So now since you seen more you can and you would compare and form an opinion. In that process you appreciate somethings in your own well and some things in the other well.That's it,plain and simple.

Even those who criticize things in India do realise well that the host countries might not assimilate them entirely or even decenlty but that doesn't stop your brain from comparing or criticising.Nothing wrong with that as long as is logical and valid.

That doesn't amount to 'spitting on your face'. This is one prime difference between we Indians and Americans[maybe even others,I don't know]. They acknowledge their mistakes and shortcoming and work on it,while we under the gard of pride,nationalism or whatever try to play negative things down.

You can't improve if you don't acknowledge. Whites had to and did acknowledge racism prevalent in their societies. Where do we acknowledge the various 'isms' in our society. We just live i

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sam
RE:RE:To Mr.Ishant and all those Aus born Indians
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 05:29 AM
Looks like you and your family have suffered a lot. I feel sorry for you.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sam
RE:RE:RE:To Mr.Ishant and all those Aus born Indians
by Sam on Jan 16, 2008 05:30 AM
Hello Dinesh,
Looks like you and your family have suffered a lot. I feel sorry for you. BTW do you have decent job now? Are you ok?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 300 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message