SREESANTH IS GRADE B & IRFAN IS IN GRADE C . A PLAYER WHO CONCEDED 10 RUN PER OVER IS GRADED OVER A PLAYER WHO CONCEDES 5 RPO WONDERFUL GOD BLESS INDIAN CRICKET
RE:SREESANTH
by MohdShaukat Shaikh on Sep 28, 2007 11:26 PM
Ye to Na-insafi Hai Thakur,Ranking about Shreeshanth,not critise, lakin usko to Kutake ke Jaise Marte Hai--- phir Bhi?.. usko Grade B..? Ye to sarsar Na-insafi Hai with players like Irfan Pathan, Ajit Agerkar & Munaf Patel. Well wisher, SHKT
RE:RE:SREESANTH
by MohdShaukat Shaikh on Sep 28, 2007 11:29 PM
IT IS NOT ALL FAIR FOR IRFAN PATHAN, THEY SHOULD CHANGED RANKING OF SHREESANTH TO GRADE C INSTEAD OF B, AND SHOULD BE GIVEN GRADE B TO A COMMITTED PLAYER LIKE IRFAN PATHAN.....
RE:SREESANTH
by seejo paul on Sep 29, 2007 02:28 PM
If u r saying only about that one final match,then wat about Harbhajan Singh who conceded 12 runs an over?If u take the tournament as a whole then Sreesanth was the one who made the dream come true of beating Australia.Also taking two priceless catches and that too in a tournament which saw a lot of simple catches put down.Thing twice before u say anything man.
RE:SREESANTH
by Sumit on Sep 29, 2007 02:59 AM
What is your problem man ? Why u peoples after Sreesanth. Twenty-20 World Cup in India.. because of Sreesanth only. If he did not bowl well in Semi final you donkeys will not jump in your ass for the victory. Also he took a good wicket and 2 catches Afridi and Misbah. One of them is Golden Catch otherwise you can dream of this world cup. You all regional bias donkeys. Yes it is true.. they are not doing right with Irfan. He also should be in Grade B. Instead you nuts dont write against Sreesanth.
RE:SREESANTH
by pooja gupta on Sep 29, 2007 12:18 PM
I agree with Mr. Sumit... Sree santh is such a fine cricketer and a fighter.can u people show anybody in indian cricket who dare to stare Mathew Hayden or other Aussies..His agression positively affects the whole team..as a result we got T20.Hats of to Sreesanth
RE:SREESANTH
by asif iqbal on Sep 29, 2007 12:23 PM
Looks like Malu woke up. No one has right to say about any players. It should be treated on there performance and not considering only on a single tournament.
Ye to Na-insafi Hai Thakur,Ranking about Shreeshanth,not critise, lakin usko to Kutake ke Jaise Marte Hai--- phir Bhi?.. usko Grade B..? Ye to sarsar Na-insafi Hai with players like Irfan Pathan, Ajit Agerkar & Munaf Patel. Well wisher, SHKT
RE:about ranking
by Sumit on Sep 29, 2007 03:01 AM
What is your problem man ? Why u peoples after Sreesanth. Twenty-20 World Cup in India.. because of Sreesanth only. If he did not bowl well in Semi final you donkeys will not jump in your ass for the victory. Also he took a good wicket and 2 catches Afridi and Misbah. One of them is Golden Catch otherwise you can dream of this world cup. You all regional bias donkeys. Yes it is true.. they are not doing right with Irfan. He also should be in Grade B. Instead you nuts dont write against Sreesanth.
Irfan Pathan: Man of the Match (20-20 worldcup final)... one of the ace bowler of Indian cricket..but still in GRADE C.... this is not fair with him....at least he deserve GRADE B....Please support if u agree with me..
RE:Irfan Pathan
by MohdShaukat Shaikh on Sep 28, 2007 06:34 PM
U r 200% percent right, pls check my message, n pass over 2 everybody, this is what our Indian Cricket.... not sportive ..SHKT. Ye to Na-insafi Hai Thakur,Ranking about Shreeshanth,not critise, lakin usko to Kutake ke Jaise Marte Hai--- phir Bhi?.. usko Grade B..? Ye to sarsar Na-insafi Hai with players like Irfan Pathan, Ajit Agerkar & Munaf Patel. Well wisher, SHKT
RE:Irfan Pathan
by on Sep 29, 2007 08:09 AM
Irfan Pathan got what he deserves - Grade C. The guy has been out of team of almost 6 months now. Every one else in grades above have played much more consistently than him. People should not get carried away with one good performance.
All Sr players especially Ganguly,Tendulkar etc shud be placed in Hit List category ie 12 lacs per year & if perform well Grade D onwards otherwise....simply sack & give way to youngsters instead of being selfish....
RE:Hit List category
by Moses Joseph on Sep 28, 2007 06:15 PM
HIT LIST - BOARD SHOULD REVIEW. "HIT LIST" is interesting. But superstars cannot be in hit list. The rule of hit list should apply to all categories. Those who do no perform well for three matches at a stretch hould be downgraded to immediately next lower grade. Tandulkar and Ganguly have performed well recently and are in form. Rahul Rahul is out of form and has not scored well in ecent matches. DOES HE DESREVE GRADE A? BOARD SHOULD REVIEW.
RE:Hit List category
by BIPIN SHARMA on Sep 28, 2007 06:19 PM
In a straight way I would like to suggest that they have become outdated,now only younger player should be given chance to play.
Putting VVS Laxman and Veeru in Grade B is not at all justified when one considers that Dhoni who cannot play in pitches outside the Indian subcontinent and Yuvraj, who is totally helpless against class spinners, are in 'A' grade. Offcourse, VVS is not a good fielder but so is Zaheer. VVS is in fact one of the few batsmen who has a better success rate overseas than on Indian pitches, which is a great virtue.
RE:Retainership ..............................
by krishna raj on Sep 28, 2007 03:55 PM
i agree with u..laxman should be in grade A...he has been in this indian team for almost a decade now and he has played many crucial knocks and saved india in many situations in foreign soils...even in the last england tour he played well...but still he is always underrated...what else should he do prove BCCI that he is a world class player..
RE:Retainership ..............................
by Umesh M Tambe on Sep 28, 2007 05:31 PM
VVS is not a World Class palyer and does not deserve to be in Grade A. He is not sure of his place in ODI and will very soon loose his place in Tests to Yuvraj
RE:Retainership ..............................
by Human Value on Sep 28, 2007 06:16 PM
Laxman's one day record is pretty good 6 centuries in 84 matches. He is the classiest batsman in the team. It is Ganguly who does not deserve to be in the 'A' group. But ever since Ganguly ditched Dalmiya he is being taken care of by Powar and co.
RE:Retainership ..............................
by Ganesh Ram on Sep 28, 2007 06:22 PM
VVS should have agreed to part with 10-15% of his fees , and he wud have been in A grade...poor Guy.dosent Know about Sharad Pawar.... VVS dont worry Negotiate with Sharadji.or if u have a few acres of Sugarcane field, give it to him and he will oblige
Cricket is a team game Then why grade players Does grade A mean they are superior to others If so what is the criteria to assess GradeA player with grade D.
RE:Why GRADE
by raman singh on Sep 28, 2007 03:35 PM
Pranam, u must be working somehwre, there u get diff salaries based on yoru performances.. this is to inspire u... else if u keep giving them omeny without any genuine out put.. u will face the world cup debacle where in the team was back at home before bangaladesh.. hope it got into your mind.. else.. forget the question..
RE:Why GRADE
by pops s on Sep 28, 2007 06:18 PM
pranam R U TELLING THAT THEIR IS NO DIFFRENCE BETWEEN SACHIN and Piyush Chawla, then u must b joking n u need a treatment.
RE:Why GRADE
by pranam on Sep 28, 2007 07:02 PM
Mr Raman and pops thank you,my query is not comparing players ablity etc Ssy in a match X was outstanding why dont u give more as incentive? Sachin cannot bowl as well as piyush nor Piyush can bat as well as Sachin But the fact is both have to do well if India has to win Then in that case why grade even before match starts In a particular game if A or B be it a newcomer or a senior does well give huge cash incentive. This grading introduces complacency on the part of GradeA and B guys
What have Nehra, Balaji and Bhandari done to receive the royal diss from BCCI? And suddenly, why is Laxman placed in the `B´contract category? BCCI is whimsical!
