Discussion Board

Pak forfeit 4th Test

Total 35 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Ball should be examined in LAB and decision be made public
by vinayak on Sep 25, 2006 10:43 AM

Ball should be examined in LAB and decision be made public.

Public still does not know exactly what has happened?

Who is right and who is wrong?

Only way is to examine the ball in the LAB. But will

this happen???

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Deepak Tyagi
Good 4 Cricket
by Deepak Tyagi on Aug 26, 2006 12:21 PM

At least we have an umpire that is calling a spade a spade. Murlidharan was rightly called off for throwing & pakistan is also involved in ball tampering, something that's not new.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
hair must be banned
by mallikarjunaiah on Aug 23, 2006 11:41 AM

hair must prove his point of ball tampered instead just yelling out balltampered by the pakistani cricketers.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
hair sux
by hllboy on Aug 21, 2006 11:07 PM

hair sux !!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
bad 4 cricket!
by SWAROOP on Aug 21, 2006 10:13 PM

Umpire Darell Hair should be punished for tampering with the Gentleman's game....he spoiled the very foundation of Cricket!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
pak forfeit 4th test
by KISHORE on Aug 21, 2006 08:15 PM

In my opinion,ICC have all the powers to do anything and they have set some rules which have to be followed,and the umpires also are from the ELITE panel ,their decision on behalf of ICC should be respected.The umpires know the game very well and can assess the condition of the ball at any stage of the game,so there must be something wrong with the ball at that particular point.NOTHING HAPPENS WITHOUT A REASON.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
HS Bhagat
pak's forfeiting the 4th Test
by HS Bhagat on Aug 21, 2006 06:18 PM

I personally feel that Pak could have protected in a different manner. Not comming out to play for 45 mins was not the way to go. They were asking for trouble by doing that... and they got it.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Numan Qadri
Pak forfeit 4th Test
by Numan Qadri on Aug 21, 2006 05:05 PM

In my opinion, umpire Darell Hair has been biased towards Pakistan. Awarding 5 penalty runs to Eng & allowing english batsmen to choose another ball on the pretext of ball tampering by pak isn't justified, unless there is videographic evidence of the pakistan players caught in the act. Even the umpires gave their verdict without even talking 2 pakistan. I think the forfeiture begins frm that incident & could well have been avoided, had the umpires followed the right procedure. The cricket ball can achieve such a condition. But the umpires clearly seem to be biased.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ball tamper
by bharat on Aug 21, 2006 02:37 PM

pakistan has a history with ball tampering
but if they had to be fined it should have been fair- by checking the ball and showing to all the tv channels and the uipires giving the rason for the penalty
hair may be controversial but he calls a spade a spade as many people still believe muralitharan is a chucker to some degree

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 35 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Write a message