More the reports it is often the postings which become very interesting .Although very often I find the languages in some of the comments -disgusting . While the two players often remain good competitors and show great sportsmanship .We fight . Tow great players who can be in the list of all time great played a great match - so enjoy and may be repeat in TV.Pity another great is not even a shadow of what he was - Fedderer , may be he has to settle with 16 and no further .Nadal may also reach those mile stones .Anyway at the end I can only say saw some exiting sport and compare it to mix match trash we were given for 45 days What a misery it was ! well I have not watched a single match and watched it in Air ports on and off. We seem to get lot of thrill out of make belief like in films.
Re: Psssst....Hey!!
by Loqe Loooqeee on Jun 11, 2012 09:32 PM
I guess the stuff it advice you gave me in a reply to my post earlier applies to you loser. I guess a loser like you should really get a life of some sort, any life would do.
PM or Pssst... here is a status of you, LOSER with a LOSER'S view of life.
Post Rafa's 11th slam win and 3rd successive win over Djoko,the fate of the goatherds(all closet Novak fans now) will be more pitiable.You can look forward to a series of more and more lame and pathetic posts by the kinds of Bango Tango,Vasantiben and Mithani.Anyway here's a status report of those losers- Mithani-Still delusional.Stuck in 2003-07.Wild conspiracy theories like surface change at Wimbledon.Silently moved to the Novak camp.Will blame everything-wind,draw,referees,rain,breaks,lack of blue clay,ATP..simply everything will be blamed for Federer's loss.Vasantiben-Still abuses and only abuses.Not a word of sense.Got banned for 10 days,came back but still full of abuses.Shiva-Vanished.Nowhere to hide his face.Anurag(my clone)-Silently jumped ship to the Novak camp.Stopped his silly predictions and is more silent nowadays.Vasudevan uncle-vanished.Narang-stopped watching tennis.Tennis is fortunatego Tango,Vasantiben and Mithani.Anyway here's a status report of those losers.
Re: Grass Clay
by Loqe Loooqeee on Jun 11, 2012 09:50 PM
Yeah right. If other players win and yours loses the tournments are off springs, if your player wins, they are the most important tournaments in the world and they are they only ones that matter. What double standards that is usual from the not so real sports fans.
First of all, Congrats to Nadal a deserving winner and hard luck to the rest of players. It is funny that how easy people discount a player's win of a Grand Slam for lots of silly and good for nothing factors such as: * He has won it in a weak era. * The main rivals were injured or did not compete. * The main rivals are old or past their prime. * The main rivals are out of form. * he won it but he still has inferior head to head record against his main rival. * This is not his favorite surface. * The rain stopped the match and was factor in giving him a chance to come back. * He is doping. * The list goes on. Why can't we simply accept the fact the better player at this moment won the tournament? Why can't we be happy that we had the pleasure to watch Federer dominate for a while and have a great duel against Nadal and then Nadal's time to dominate and have a great duel with Federer and now Nole's turn to dominate and have a great duel against Federer and Nadal?
Why can't we just enjoy tennis for the the excitements it has given us since the day it was invented and enjoy the quality of tennis ALL the Pro tennis players regardless of their rankings an get behind our favorite player without showing prejudice and hate towards the other tennis guys?
Remember, while we are all wasting our times commenting bad comments against each other and against Fedex, Rafa, & Nole, the three are enjoying each others company not caring about what is said on any discussion board.
Re: Congrats Nadal.
by md tamanna on Jun 11, 2012 08:13 PM
HE FINISHED FEDERED,WHEN HE WAS IN HIS PRIME,WHO IS CONSIDERED ALL TIME GREAT..NOW HE DEMOLISHED JOKOVIK,WHO IS CONSIDERED ANOTHER ALL TIME GREAT..HE HAS SUPERIOR RECORD AGAINST BOTH HIS RIVALS..NO ONE IS OUT OF FORM..AND DOPING IS A MYTH..
Re: Congrats Nadal.
by Anuraug Rathor on Jun 11, 2012 08:54 PM
You apply your lecture to yourself first,I saw you abuse one of the members on another page.So stuff it and get on with your life.
Re: Re: Congrats Nadal.
by Loqe Loooqeee on Jun 11, 2012 09:44 PM
You must be tired of stuffing it all the times and trying to find a life that you tell others to do so. The above advice was meant for real highly intellectual tennis fans not YOU. I guess you are the one who needs to get a life since you don't have one and from the state of your mind will never do.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Congrats Nadal.
by Loqe Loooqeee on Jun 12, 2012 01:35 AM
I highly doubt that you even understand what highly intellectual means. It is OK mate, we all have our flaws and faults.
Re: Congrats Nadal.
by Loqe Loooqeee on Jun 12, 2012 05:13 PM
Guys, an insect of some sort just replied to my latest comment and associated Aussie Slang with my writings which is weird. The name is Loqe Loooqeee with a "Q" not Loge Looogeee with a "G". Learn to read the name right first then talk about educating us.
Nadal may have won the French title seven times, but he has not won Wimbeldon seven times or even less. Comparing him to Borg is totally wrong. Borg won French and Wimbeldon six times in a row. Mind you they are totally different surfaces. To win these surfaces with in a month speaks volumes about greatness of Borg.
Re: Nadal
by Anuraug Rathor on Jun 11, 2012 08:57 PM
Usha Sundaram-Borg didnt win Wimbledon 6 times-he won 5 times.And he didnt win French Open 6 times in a row-he won a total of 6 titles.He did the French-Wimbledon double 3 times,against some of tennis' all time best players,and thats why I rate Borg as the GOAT not Federer.And Nadal's already done the French-Wimbledon double twice.And had a chance last year.Hope he does it this time.
Re: Re: Nadal
by Loqe Loooqeee on Jun 11, 2012 09:58 PM
Borg the GOAT? And he has not won AUS and US Open Grand Slams? Oh wait, next you will tell me that AUS and US Open are not worth being considered part of GS titles and they don't count
Re: Re: Re: Nadal
by Anuraug Rathor on Jun 11, 2012 10:52 PM
He didnt win Aus Open cos he only played once.And the US Open in his era moved from clay to hard.He lost 4 finals overall.Anyway if Sampras can be rated GOAT without crossing SFs of French Open and never winning an ATP event on clay,why cant Borg be rated GOAT?Oh wait Logeeee doesnt understand logic so forget it.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nadal
by Loqe Loooqeee on Jun 12, 2012 01:33 AM
Please, you are the one with all the logic in the world. What logic are you talking about mate? Borg not winning AUS and US Open and being regarded as GOAT? Sampras at least won three out of four type Grand Slams compared to Borg winning only two, and weren't you yesterday against the argument of that changing course surfaces affects the player's ability and chances of winning a grand slam, and today you are using it to defend Borg not winning the US Open? I guess a hypocrite like you is allowed to do so. Please mate, you call that logic. Wait, I guess it is logic since it makes sense to you in your own logical world.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nadal
by Loqe Loooqeee on Jun 12, 2012 05:19 PM
Poor guy, believes that the word "Mate" is an Aussie copyrighted property and cannot be used by any one else other than Aussies otherwise they are an imposter. No wonder you are the joke of the board and giving all Tennis Fans a bad name and an idiotic like reputation.
