never in the history that one could see three top players fighting for supremacy in all the grand slams..this is one of the best phase for tennis..previously,it used to be McEnroe vs borg, McEnroe vs connors, Edberg vs Becker, Sampras vs agassi,agassi vs courier, fed vs nad etc..all were duels..but this should be the first of its kind..
Re: Re: never in the history
by breddy last on Jun 11, 2012 06:26 PM
Thats true its all djoker and nadal show for the past year and half... federer just a side actor
Re: never in the history
by visit on Jun 11, 2012 06:25 PM
Comment something with sense like kolkata victory in IPL.No useless comments like this .D U M B O !
Re: never in the history
by Anuraug Rathor on Jun 11, 2012 09:00 PM
Correct except for the fact that Federer is finished and is not a serious threat at the Grand Slams anymore.
Two brilliant players at their best for 4 consecutive GS finals. And Rafa could end the rot on his favorite arena...Vamos. And big round of applause for Novak, what a fighter he is. Wimbledon...bring it on !
Re: Will Rafa be first player ever to win 20 grand slams
by surya das on Jun 11, 2012 06:08 PM
He lost that opportunity when he lost 3 slam finals in a row or else he would be standing total of 14, just two behind from Federrer
He was in awesome form in this tournament. He didn't lose any set till semifinal. He deserves the this title. He proved why he is all time best clay court player. Nadal got advantage of rain interruption but still I feel he would have won in 5 setters if match had completed yesterday.
Re: R.Nadal...
by Abhijit Sarkar on Jun 11, 2012 06:16 PM
Anurag, at the end a win is a win. Yesterday after the rain, Nadal's top spin were in affective which brings Nole into the game and it was Nole who got the advantage yesterday and Nole was too good to dominate the later part of the game yesterday. But I agree with you, it should have been a five setter “Ronald Gaross Finale” in true sense. It was much disappointing to see the game finished in a double fault. Crazy...
Re: Re: Re: R.Nadal...
by Vinita Punjabi on Jun 11, 2012 06:46 PM
sorry Anurag.....it should have been he did not lose any set until Final and not he didn't lose any set till semifinal....both players were playing very well...both players had chances and not that only Rafa had chances....
Roger Federer should bounce back and defeat Rafa Nadal, Nadal is a half animal and he shouldn't be playing mens tennis instead he should play a game with big wild animals, I think he dopes... I hate him...and my dear fellow Indians, saala you guys would not have seen a tennis racket and you guys comment about grass,clay courts..picking up lines from TV commentators huh?
Re: Fedex is better
by madhavi s on Jun 11, 2012 06:03 PM
uh who are u btw? even if he dopes he outclassed federer like a million times , how many more matches do u need for proof ??
Re: Fedex is better
by Naarayan on Jun 11, 2012 06:04 PM
And you are what some tennis champion to comment is it? You saala STFU.. in a forum anybody has the right to comment.. buzz off
Re: Fedex is better
by ankush jairath on Jun 11, 2012 06:17 PM
abe BKL who r u to comments upon indians ..... this thing is clear .... u r a big loser.....rafa rocks
If yesterday would have finished the match Novak Djokovic could have won the match, because after losing 2 sets he won 3rd one and looked very good form in 4th Set. Any how Congrats Nadal, u r the master of clay court. We shall wait to see what’s happen in Wimbaldon and others.
