Pakistan-based terrorists will launch another deadly Mumbai-style attack on India,says a US intelligence think-tank,Stratfor.Coming on the heels of the Tokyo donors' meeting which gave Pakistan some $5 billion,Stratfor concludes that these aid packages would have no effect in changing Pakistan's behaviour vis-a-vis India."Yet the gradual unraveling of command and control within the Pakistani military establishment has enabled many more of Islamabad's Islamist militant proxies operating in Pakistan and India to team up with transnational jihadists to carry out deadlier and more strategically targeted attacks,it said.Though the timing is uncertain,India is likely to witness another large-scale attack on its soil that will once again escalate cross-border tensions,Stratfor warned.India had refrained from taking a more militaristic response against Pakistan after the Mumbai attacks,which Stratfor had criticized,saying that a lack of response was far more dangerous than the threat of escalation,which was the argument UPA had given then.Stratfor believes that the UPA government was too soft,but that if the BJP comes to power there was a greater expectation of a stronger response to Pakistan."India is more likely to deliver a forceful response to future attacks should the BJP emerge victorious in these elections,"it said.Stratfor said "India was watching fearfully as the jihadist insurgency in neighbouring Pakistan has spread to India's doorstep".THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE TO NDA.
Re: WEAK PM BUT STRONG PM IN WAITING-VOTE NDA.
by sharda kejriwal on Apr 19, 2009 02:18 PM Permalink
If the Congress comes to power than there will be maqny more attacks and rest assured no action will be taken by India against the terrorists or Pakistan. They are secular and how can they take against Muslim's. They will just exchange letters and Pakistan will ask some 300 questions and India will reply. This process will continue. Than they will ask uncle Sam to intervene and ask Pakistan to stop all these and Pakistan will stop.This is the same Congress which gifted all that was won by the Indian Military in 1971 War without asking for the POK in return. And MMS having no choice but to go as per his masters. What a slave can do. It is the masters who takes a final decision and not a Slave.
Re: Re: WEAK PM BUT STRONG PM IN WAITING-VOTE NDA.
by Manoj on Apr 19, 2009 02:49 PM Permalink
we will be attacked again and again... no doubt..that is because we don't fight the enemies together.. it has happened during NDA and UPA. by blaming congress or BJP is not the way to fight terroism. They have only exchanged letters. They have not exchanged terroists, who are planning and executing these attacks. you are a slave of our thinkings.. and will always be. don't think biased think on basis of truth
Re: Re: WEAK PM BUT STRONG PM IN WAITING-VOTE NDA.
by Virtual Insider on Apr 19, 2009 02:27 PM Permalink
Congress should be brought to power without fail...Congress is the only party that will make the nation STRONG...BJP (Bharat Jalao Party) will burn India to flames....
Re: Re: Re: WEAK PM BUT STRONG PM IN WAITING-VOTE NDA.
by sharda kejriwal on Apr 19, 2009 04:23 PM Permalink
And what Italian National Congress will do to India. Convert it to Christianity or an Islamic state. After all Indra Gandhi married to Feroz Khan but it was Gandhiji who advised Nehru to ask Feroz Khan to Feroz Gandhi. And the Nehru dynasty continues in the name of Gandhi.
Re: WEAK PM BUT STRONG PM IN WAITING-VOTE NDA.
by MohammedFarhan Moosa on Apr 19, 2009 05:44 PM Permalink
kedem.. i dont no if u will accept my view point coz u are a blindfold BJP guy... but the possibility of BJP behind the attacks across the country during UPA rule cannot be ignored... this is the best possibility in the light of political games people play for votes.....
Re: WEAK PM BUT STRONG PM IN WAITING-VOTE NDA.
by shubh bolo on Apr 19, 2009 03:00 PM Permalink
Though a P.M,Manmohan singh was meant for petty things.All major celebratiions- Obama's Oath or even Olympics- was attended by Sonia. P.M , who should have naturally representted India on such occasions was left at home to attend petty domestic chores. Thus not the P.M, but chief of a political party represented india in such international fora.Now Sonia is bending backwards to prove that the P.M is worthy. Is this not selective posturing?
