You may claim but on what ground?YOU HAVE MARRIED A FELLOW FROM OUR opponent AND MAY TURN a SPY AGAINST US IN CASE OF conflict.YOU ARE PROSPECTIVE opponent OF INDIA AND HENCE WE EILL WRITE ABOUT ANY AND EVERY ROOM OF YOURS WHERE ANYTHING OF PAKISTAN CAN BE SPILLED.
Re: Sania shoab Malik
by a m on Dec 07, 2015 10:55 AM
Country hood and therefore Partition of India were not unanimous decisions nor was there any scientific reason for it. Therefore it is not morally binding on any one to participate in the artificial hatred between these two countries. The hatred is mainly the work of selfish powerful people.
Individuals have no choice about which country to be born in, so countries cannot be morally binding on them. Countries can only be service providers, not owners or rulers of their populations.
You may claim but on what ground?YOU HAVE MARRIED AFELLOW FROM OUR ENEMY AND MAY TURN SPYAGAINST US IN CASE OF WAR.YOU ARE PROSPECTIVE ENEMYOF INDIA AND HENCE WE EILL WRITE ABOUT ANY AND EVERY ROOM OF YOURS WHERE ANYTHING OF PAKISTAN CAN BE SPILLED.
Re: cheap journalism.
by David Jacob on Nov 26, 2015 11:59 AM
Really cheap journalism. Look at these articles, implying there is some connection between babies and bedrooms. Everyone knows that babies actually come from maternity homes.
Big talking Sania should keep in her mind that we tennis enthusiats know very well that she owes 70% of her success to Martina Hingis. She has come to the limelight only after she paired with Hingis, whose brilliant shots overcome Sania's service faults.
Re: Who is bothered
by a m on Dec 07, 2015 11:21 AM
Sania creates hope for half a billion women in India who suffer unequal social status. It is not important whether Hingis contributed to her success or how much. What matters is that Sania played completely by rules and her success is completely within rules. She has not reached there because of any unfair or secret process such as telephone calls from politicians in power. It is very much her own achievement and an example that being woman is not a liability or disability.
Hi sania, It is natural that once you are married people will ask you about the child. You should be proud of it. Anyway, since you are married to another national man, you should be proud to accept his nationality rather than hanging on indian nationality. You are inviting shame to you & your husband. India is a country which has a plenty of talents & if we nurture them in a right way they would make us proud. FYI, records are meant to be broken any day.
Re: Your answer says a lot about your thinking sania...
by David Jacob on Nov 26, 2015 11:56 AM
That's a strange argument you are making. Does she have no choice in these matters because she is a woman who got married ? That she has to follow her husband's nationality.
Does that argument apply to Mr. Akhtar too; would you welcome him with open arms if he decided to join his wife in being Indian ??
By any chance, do you work for the Pakistan tennis authority ?
Re: Re: Your answer says a lot about your thinking sania...
by antony on Nov 26, 2015 10:19 PM
Hi Mr. David Jacob, Sania has one choice, which is to become pakistani. Its her choice. For the sake of Shoaib Malik she must follow his routes, or else she can ask mr. Shoaib Malik to become indian, vice versa... Instead of playing 50-50. I dont have to work for pakistan tennis authority to tell this, its common sense my dear... why are you blocking many youngster's getting sponsorship to play tennis in higher level???
Re: Re: Re: Your answer says a lot about your thinking sania...
by David Jacob on Nov 28, 2015 11:41 PM
You left out another choice she has, that things continue as they.
I don't have a problem with any of these choices, and it would appear for now- which choice this family has made. There is nothing that requires she "must" follow either of the choices you have "given" her.
Re: Re: Re: Your answer says a lot about your thinking sania...
by David Jacob on Nov 28, 2015 11:42 PM
You left out another choice she has, that things continue as they are now.
I don't have a problem with any of these choices, and it would appear for now- which choice this family has made. There is nothing that requires she "must" follow either of the choices you have "given" her.
