Re: As for 8 Consecutive Finals!!
by bhunu pro on Sep 07, 2012 11:26 AM
if reaching SF/Final is equal to getting thrashed in 1st or second round--- then you win !!
A players reaching almost every Final/SF/QF stage..compared to player not making upto SF/QC/Final consecutively.. isnt decide who is better? Here debate is bet Nadal vs Fedex.. Now Fedex being taregetted with stats of evry great player in history... thats itself is prof of L-EG-E-N-D
Re: Fedex vs Nadal turned into Fedex vs all time greats
by Anuraug Rathor on Sep 07, 2012 03:00 PM
Looks like you were in hibernation till WImbledon 2011.Who didnt make SF/QF/Final consecutively?Nadal??LOL.He won 3 slams in 2008& 2010,was in 3 slam finals in 2011 winning 1 of them, and 2 slam finals in 2012 winning one of them.Please explain how he managed all that without making final/SF/QF stage.We are waiting with bated breath for your revelations :):):)Please bless us lesser mortals with your divine knowledge.
Re: Re: Fedex vs Nadal turned into Fedex vs all time greats
by rajesh on Sep 07, 2012 04:25 PM
You can also reply to demons revelations right? Why do you never reply to those? Is it becuase he or she(I am expecting she) is a nadal fan and so she can post brilliant "revelations"? :) rathor is becoming a laughing stock :)
Re: Re: Re: Fedex vs Nadal turned into Fedex vs all time greats
by Anuraug Rathor on Sep 07, 2012 10:24 PM
Yeah I guess I am becoming a laughing stock....the point is that you're the only one laughing:) :) :)
Re: Re: Re: Fedex vs Nadal turned into Fedex vs all time greats
by Anuraug Rathor on Sep 07, 2012 10:25 PM
And maybe you can follow your own advice and reply to bhunus revelations??Not applicable,cos (s)he is a FedUp fan?I thought so.Plug on,you might even believe yourself one day.
Re: Do you think "17" is "Highest"!
by bhunu pro on Sep 07, 2012 10:44 AM
ok ..friend..u r now including doubles/Mixed doubles to d list which is "dependent" game/team game..here we are debating on the greatest tennis players..In dat case even Leander Paes can be debated with Fedex to be greater or not ?? .. Also.. Fedex has 33 ATP World Tour Masters 1000 finals..which Mcnroe doesnt boast of. However..dis is not d yardstick o both can be judged
Re: Re: Do you think "17" is "Highest"!
by Anuraug Rathor on Sep 07, 2012 03:03 PM
What about the fact that inspite of being 5 years senior,Fedex has only managed to equal Nadal's record of masters titles??That too,Nadal was leading and Fedex equalled it only last month.
Re: Bhuno pro
by bhunu pro on Sep 07, 2012 10:38 AM
Again.. u openly ignore d facts .. offcourse its apperances..which NO other player had.. yes..no other players..and reaching SF/QF's def proves ur skills compared to rest playing lot.. Leave Nadal.. dese many appearnaces none other players had made.. EVER ..
Care 2 hv a glance at edex record..shich is not just greater than Nadal..but all time greats..
33 consecutive Slam QF
23 consecutive Slam SFs
Grand Slam finals (all except Juan Mart�Del Potro), an all-time men's record, (1. Philippoussis, 2. Safin, 3. Roddick, 4. Hewitt, 5. Agassi, 6. Baghdatis, 7. Nadal, 8. Gonzalez, 9. Djokovic, 10. Murray, 11. S�ling). Sampras has also faced 12 different opponents and defeated 9 of them in Grand Slam finals (all except Edberg, Safin, and Hewitt), (1. Agassi, 2. Courier, 3. Pioline, 4. Martin
all time record of 17 Grand Slams in 10 years,once started winning (2003–12) > Sampras 14 Grand Slams in the span of 13 years (1990–2002).
24 Grand Slam finals > record of 19 by Ivan Lendl.[13]
10 consecutive Grand Slam finals > Jack Crawford in 1934
won 8 of them > DEFATED RECORD 4 OF Laver/Agassi (2000).
Now compare how many diff opponents in Slam finals Nadal had faced vs what Fedex has faced..
Fedex fans might be complacent dat makes Nadal fans to ridicule Federer
-- which is at best living in eutopia..
BTW.. Nadal fans themselevs are comparing Fedex with other all time greats in most of d a comparision ...and nOT NAD-AL ..Bring on more..
Re: Now d real stats --Bring on
by bhunu pro on Sep 07, 2012 09:56 AM
and here I have just referred couple of wiki inputs.. more wud from dobeat/sportsillustrated/mentennisforum/bleach...
Re: Re: Now d real stats --Bring on
by bhunu pro on Sep 07, 2012 10:35 AM
ok..u need to see how federer was abelt o reach upto final.. rtaher Nadal was not making into almost every SF/Finals even post-2008...dats the point here !!
Re: Re: Re: Now d real stats --Bring on
by Anuraug Rathor on Sep 07, 2012 03:06 PM
Post 2008,I think you were in hibernation bhunu.Or maybe you were following baseball or kabaddi and not tennis.Because in 2008 and 2010,Nadal won 3 slams each.In 2011 he was in 3 slam finals winning 1.And in 2012 he's in 2 of 4 slams,missing one due to injury.So please explain to us mere mortals how Nadal achieved all these without making into SF/Finals.Only you seem to have this divine knowledge or maybe Rajesh shares it too.:):):)
It has always been Fedex out of his prime while Nadal moving towards his prime post-2007..Still fedex was able to hold him in fast hard courts..Outside clay RAFA has won against fedex mostly on slow hard courts .. these statics needs to be dived into deeply..US Open wud have determined some result but dat didnt happen ( am saying this even when fedex now has crossed 30)..If 17 grand slams does not give correct picture ..even 18-7 Rafa HEH against Fedex is NOT true picture ..T time !!
Re: Look closely -- u will see
by Sanjeev Sekhar on Sep 07, 2012 02:02 PM
18-7 doesn't give a clear picture!!!!!!!!!!Please check out, what happened in their first duel....
