The legend of Nadal just keeps growing,leaving the losers here to whine all day.Not long ago a self appointed tennis pundit was claiming Nadal had not won a tournament since 2010.Well Nadal won the 2010 US Open,which comes at the fag end of 2010 so there's your bubble burst.Effectively Nadal was titleless since 2011.In this period he lost 3 grand slam finals to one player,and won the French Open.He lost a total of 7 finals to one single player.Well that's not a bad record at all.So cry me a river.LOL.
Nadal has reached 12 finale of last 15 he played, thats simply a sign of strugling player. Nadal is the only player in history to win two tournaments seven time, its also sign of average player bcz its on clay. Nadal is d only player who have almost dominated Fedex (GOAT as per you all) is also sign of a average player. Nadal is having won more masters dan anyone is sign os average player. Nadal already won 4 slam other dan clay, it wont count because he won 6 more at clay. Nadal has reached in final of last four GS of all surface, but it wont count bcz he won on clay. This can go on my dear friends, the player of Nova calibre has been beaten by Nadal on all surface, even now he hold d edge over Nova in H2H. The player like Fedex has worst record against him, i suppose the only player who has beaten Fedex so many times. >>>>>>>>>>
Re: Nadal is below average player
by Anuraug Rathor on Apr 30, 2012 08:40 PM
The only person struggling(apart from the so called GOAT) is his dimwitted fan,Hussein Mithani.
Re: Nadal is below average player
by HUSSAIN MITHANI on Apr 30, 2012 11:15 PM
nadal has reached those 12 finals of last 15 but how many has he won on a non-clay surface? why can't he excute a win on a non-clay event. he always struggles to win a non-clay event. why does he always wins so easily on clay but not on other surfaces. its a sign of a clay court player. he hasn't won a non-clay event since 2010. Nadal is the only player to win two tournaments 7 seven times on clay only unlike roger. again clay comes in the picture. federer has shown he can win one tournaments fives times or more on different surfaces, nadal is restricted to clay only. nadal has dominated roger thanks to 14 meetings on clay. nadal hasn't met federer 14 times on other surfaces. again Mr. Father, when it comes to Nadal, clay is the answer. federer losses in clay have been mostly against nadal while nadal has been beaten on other surfaces by more than one player. more masters thanks to clay as well. the other slams he has won but he has failed to defend anyone of them. why is that? he has just 2 wimbledons and 1 us open and 1 austrailian open. federer has 4 austrailian, novak has 3 already more than nadal. federer has 5 us open, federer has 6 wimbledon. how many indoor hardcourts has nadal won? federer has already won the atp world tour 6 times. when it comes to comparing nadal to greats like pete and the GOAT roger, nadal hasn't done anything close to them on other surfaces. nadal has been succesful on clay only. when it comes to nadal, clay is the answer.
Re: Nadal is below average player
by HUSSAIN MITHANI on Apr 30, 2012 11:16 PM
nadal has reached those 12 finals of last 15 but how many has he won on a non-clay surface? why can't he excute a win on a non-clay event. he always struggles to win a non-clay event. why does he always wins so easily on clay but not on other surfaces. its a sign of a clay court player. he hasn't won a non-clay event since 2010. Nadal is the only player to win two tournaments 7 seven times on clay only unlike roger. again clay comes in the picture. federer has shown he can win one tournaments fives times or more on different surfaces, nadal is restricted to clay only. nadal has dominated roger thanks to 14 meetings on clay. nadal hasn't met federer 14 times on other surfaces. again Mr. Father, when it comes to Nadal, clay is the answer. federer losses in clay have been mostly against nadal while nadal has been beaten on other surfaces by more than one player. more masters thanks to clay as well. the other slams he has won but he has failed to defend anyone of them. why is that? he has just 2 wimbledons and 1 us open and 1 austrailian open. federer has 4 austrailian, novak has 3 already more than nadal. federer has 5 us open, federer has 6 wimbledon. how many indoor hardcourts has nadal won? federer has already won the atp world tour 6 times. when it comes to comparing nadal to greats like pete and the GOAT roger, nadal hasn't done anything close to them on other surfaces. nadal has been succesful on clay only. when it comes to nadal, clay is the answer.
Re: Re: Nadal is below average player
by Anuraug Rathor on May 01, 2012 02:47 PM
Roger should never be compared to Nadal.Nadal has won his career slam at a way younger age.He has won an Olympic Gold.He has 21 ATP masters titles and history's best winning percentage.He has a waaay superior H2H against Federer.He has shown he is the man to beat on all surfaces.Roger is yet to beat him at a non Wimbledon slam.So to compare a grass courter like Roger to Nadal is irrational.Eat that.
Re: Re: Re: Nadal is below average player
by vasantiben parmar on May 01, 2012 03:19 PM
noboby says Rafa is below par..but u can't ignore the fact that his 75% titles r on clay
Re: Re: Nadal is below average player
by Father on May 02, 2012 10:42 AM
Ur reply said it all, the moment any1 comments about Nadal u have only few things to say about it. U will cry by saying clay, clay and clay or start comparing him with Fedex (Who is GOAT according to u) itself is a sign of the class of a player. If he has not won any other surface title in one year or so, do u think he reached so many finale without winning matches on those surface. If he could not defend title on other surfaces means 4 slams on other surfaces are useless. Talking about Fedex bro, let Nadal reached the age Fedex is and then we will talk about it as its still 5 years left for that and u never know where Nadal would be. Look at ur comment, just 2 Wimbledon, 1 US, and 1 Australian Open, my dear, go in history and see how many people have won this much also. As per you, being a clay player for Nadal, isnt it is a phenomenal acheivement to already won 4 slams on other surface where GOAT of all time managed to won only one slam on clay. The hole point is dude, no one deny how good a player Fedex is, but u doesnt have the courtesy to accept about Nadal being a good player and u are already started rating Nova a better player dan Nadal.(Ahahhahahahahaahhhh). Dude, Clay also is a equal important events as other surfaces, infact any coomon Tennis greats will u that Clay is the hardest events to play for, more mentaly and physically demanding. According to me, Nadal is one of the great of all time as of now on all surface and simply Unbeatable on clay.
Re: Re: Re: Nadal is below average player
by HUSSAIN MITHANI on May 03, 2012 06:19 AM
I don't compare nadal to federer, its nadal fans including yourself who compare the GOAT federer to nadal. I actually post to let nadal fans know that the comparison is bogus. you can wait till nadal reaches federer's age then in the meantime, I don't expect you to compare federer to nadal. if I go in history, there are many tennis players who have won more than 1 austrailian open, 1 us open or 2 wimbledon. the list is too long my friend. Right now, in the present time, nadal is not even close to pete so to bring federer in every conversation by nadal fans is quite ridiculous. Clay is only one surface, there are three other surfaces where nadal has failed. GOAT of all time Federer has won one slam on clay but he has also shown that he is also second on clay after nadal. nadal is not even second on any other surface. He doesn't even have ATP world tour tournament which is highly regarded right after the slams. Speaking of Novak, he has already claimed 3 austrailian open titles more than nadal. and he gave nadal seven straight losses. that hasn't happened to top player. even federer beat novak last year to break his streak. so novak is playing better than nadal. you can't deny that. Clay is not the hardest to play even nadal would disagree with your statement. why do you think nadal always looks forward to clay because the surface does not take a toll on the knees. Nadal has not shown with his career titles that he can be called great on other surfaces, he is great only on clay
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nadal is below average player
by Anuraug Rathor on May 04, 2012 12:16 AM
Your posts only tell us that your tennis knowledge is bogus.Anyway a hard courter like Federer shouldnt be compared to Nadal,it's a bogus comparison.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nadal is below average player
by Anuraug Rathor on May 04, 2012 12:19 AM
Novak still needs to win on clay to prove his 'greatness'.ATP WTF is not 'highly regarded' except at the cash register, and anyway it is equivalent to any other ATP masters.Federer has FAILED on clay, so he cant be compared to the GOATs Laver,Borg,Agassi,Nadal and Sampras.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nadal is below average player
by rajesh on May 04, 2012 01:23 PM
hahaha Nadal is a GOAT??? that is the biggest joke nadal fans have ever said..Take out clay court titles and nadals tropy numbers will be "SHIT"
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nadal is below average player
by rajesh on May 04, 2012 01:34 PM
Federer has not FAILED on clay..He is the second best in clay..This shows how blind nadal fans are..Mr. Anuraug,FAILING means,getting defeated in first or second rounds in every clay tournaments..Federer has reached 5 finals in French open..Is not FAILING..got it?? But as you are a Nadal fan, i expect only stupid comments..So not surpised, but just wanted to teach you basic things..Federer has 15 GS in grass and hard court events..So he is the best in grass and hard courts and second best in clay..Hope your brain understands something
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nadal is below average player
by Anuraug Rathor on May 04, 2012 09:55 PM
Well irrespective of your opinion Nadal is one of the GOATS even if he retires today.Being a FedUp fan I'm not surprised you're spouting nonsense,but if you read my post and the previous one by someone of your IQ level(Mithu),you will realise it was just a sarcastic response to what he said.But then being a FedUp fan I dont expect you to have any common sense.All I want to say is that if Nadal has 'FAILED' on hard courts and grass,Federer has 'FAILED' too on clay.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nadal is below average player
by rajesh on May 05, 2012 12:20 AM
Nadal fans talking about commonsense???? hahahaha..And dont please dont assume I will feel bad when u call federer as fedup..I have got so many nicknames for Nadal..But as i am not as cheap as anuraug, I will call him Nadal only..Becuase as i said many times in this post, both players deserve respect..The argument is about the talent and competition between two players..not the name calling..But as you are a Nadal fan, i know you wont understand anything..I know i am wasting my time but still giving a try to see, whether nadal fans will get some brain from somewhere:)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nadal is below average player
by rajesh on May 05, 2012 12:22 AM
And i want to copy your comment with your permission..irrespective of your opinion,federer is a GOAT..fair enough??becuase he has won 16 GS..yes you read it correct..16..Period
Re: Hard to emulate Federer
by Haris on Apr 30, 2012 03:36 PM
I wonder on what basis dkheads like you are able to post stuff on something you have no clue about
Re: Re: Hard to emulate Federer
by Tukaram on Apr 30, 2012 04:09 PM
It has hit hard where it was intended to. Your whining after reading my message says it all :-)
Re: Hard to emulate Federer
by aishwarya patil on Apr 30, 2012 03:47 PM
I know at least one more player who can cry like Roger. Andy Murray: He said in his post-match interview after losing to Federer at Melbourne in 2010 that although he could cry like Roger, he was sorry he could not play like him. The basic reason why Andy cried on that occasion was that he thought he lost a match he thought he should have won. Who thinks he cannot win against Roger these days?
Nadal is actually COMPENSATED by getting victory after victory on Clay Court. Nadal HAS NOT Yet Won Tennis Masters Cup even after 7 attempts !! Federer on Other hand has Won Tour Final RECORD SIT Times. So, to compensate this deficiency , Nadal is getting Clay Titles one after other every year. Clay victories will Stop after or If he wins Tennis Master's Cup !!
Re: Nadal is being compensated..............
by breddy last on Apr 30, 2012 01:49 PM
How many wins federer has at french open after some 10-12 attempts? Why only one for such a great player?
Re: Re: Nadal is being compensated..............
by rinu sharma on Apr 30, 2012 02:21 PM
@BREDDY beacuse moron, federer was 2nd best in the world on clay..he reached 5-6 finals at rolan garros..and won it as well once.
if that's not a clay court player I don't know what is. more grandslams thanks to clay, more masters thanks to clay. All the answers for nadal's success is clay, clay and more clay. he sucks at other surfaces. he can't even defend a grandslam other than clay.
Re: 34 clay titles out of 48 total. 70% winnings on clay alone.
by bango tango on Apr 30, 2012 01:03 PM
he could not even a set in the 2009 Master World Tour Final !!!!!....forget of him winning that title in the future also...
Re: 34 clay titles out of 48 total. 70% winnings on clay alone.
by breddy last on Apr 30, 2012 01:52 PM
Ignore french.. 2 winbeldon titles 3 runner-ups, 1 US open title 1 runner up, 1 Aus open 1 runner up. How many in history of tennis has such record... Wake-up man..
Re: Re: 34 clay titles out of 48 total. 70% winnings on clay alon
by Sweta on Apr 30, 2012 07:51 PM
Well said Breddy. Some empty heads know that their COAT (Crybaby Of All Time) cannot beat Rafa anymore. So, they come up with all laurels of past. Dream on empty heads.
Re: 34 clay titles out of 48 total. 70% winnings on clay alone.
by Anuraug Rathor on Apr 30, 2012 08:54 PM
There are many things you dont know.Well,if Nadal 'sucks'at other surfaces,what's youe explanation for the fact that Federer is yet to beat him at a non grass Slam?And that too way way back in 2007.Now that really 'sucks'.LOL.
Re: 34 clay titles out of 48 total. 70% winnings on clay alone.
by Anuraug Rathor on Apr 30, 2012 08:57 PM
The legend of Nadal just keeps growing,leaving the knuckleheads here to whine all day.Not long ago self appointed tennis pundit Mithani was claiming Nadal had not won a tournament since 2010.Well Nadal won the 2010 US Open,which comes at the fag end of 2010 so there's your bubble burst.Effectively Nadal was titleless since 2011.In this period he lost 3 grand slam finals to one player,and won the French Open.He lost a total of 7 finals to one single player.Well that's not a bad record at all.So cry me a river,Mithani.Anyway,you still run away when I ask you why Nadal is a clay courter by virtue of winning 15/19 Masters(since improved) on clay,but if Federer wins 14/19 on hard courts he suddenly becomes a 'all court player'.LOL.
