For good players, losing in 2nd round means out of form. For Sania, losing in 1st round means out of form and going into 2nd round, losing it means she is in top form.
Losing in 2nd round has become habit for her, so why on the earth she is going to feel the pressure?
Re: khaki-chadiwalla fundamentalist can only abuse woman in forum
by salesjb on Oct 12, 2010 05:27 PM
They even did not consider the player who contribute indian sports. But they have only skill to abuse in forums.
She talks as if she is a Champion . What are her achievements ? How many times has she got past the Second round in any Grand Slam ? And then she comes out with these huge statements.
Wonder which cloud she would have been on , had she done something substantial
Re: Re: Re: Buffoon !
by Sameer Dev on Oct 12, 2010 06:25 PM
what is the boast here. In women tennis tell me how many indians have made atleast this far where Sanai is. If someone asks her opinions... what shud she do according to you...Stay mum... grow up Vikas
Re: Re: Re: Re: Buffoon !
by commonbutawake on Oct 12, 2010 09:05 PM
I will answer for Vikas...its not tennis field where success is measured..ok sammeer, if he goes to office and sits on chair., he may be performing wonders for himself, his company, his society,. he may be breaking all recordss. but just because he does not have the media coverage , we keep shut in praising him and people like him. By his parameteres, sania may be a no good player, when it comes to international tournaments. thats the only point he is making..which is give her due respect but dont shower praises on her...as is she is godsend to be the idol for indian children..come on..vikas may be a rold model for his juniors by what he does...so see it as a profession..you may be good at it or bad..just that if u r not so good, you should have the guts to acknoewldge it...she vents everything out in media..and when people make comments, she sulks,...cant she be like navratilova..perhaps...or better still she can be like many Vikas...doing his job silently...i hpe u get the point...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Buffoon !
by Sheetal Kaur on Oct 12, 2010 10:23 PM
I think you are wrong,Vikas may be a legend for his companey. but not on his own. Sania does not represent a companey but the whole nation which Vikas does not. His achievements are only for the company's good and does not inspire any one. but by watching Sania many a youngster want to play tennis and many will succeed and one day if not better player then at least they will be like Sania. Where as Vikas does not inspire any one. Nor he lifts his country's name up when sania works (plays) she plays for whole of India and word India is attached to her play where as vikas does not work for india and the word India is not uplifted by his work. No one expect his close friends and family know who Vikas is and what he does where as with Sania whole world knows who she is. IN TENNIS SANIA IS INDIA AND AND INDIA IS SANIA. LIKE IT OR LUMP IT THAT IS THE ONLY TRUTH. MOST OF THE HATE POST HERE IS JUST OUT OF JEALOUSY NOTHING ELSE. Grow up children.
