Re: both are good but i wish FEDEX to win
by freelancer on Jun 06, 2009 03:55 PM
no chance fed ex to win when this fellow defeat Clay Court King NADAL , Federer is nothing for him on clay
Re: Re: Re: both are good but i wish FEDEX to win
by kareem on Jun 06, 2009 08:27 PM
3 sets enough to lift this cup, fedx is the evr best tennis player
Soderling is going to win french open.Fedex is playing avg tenni.some people here critises nadal that he is nothing.Tennis community all over is talking about how many record he can emulate.Research on for his forehand.If fedex is that great tell how many slam he won at age of 23.Nadal at 23 won six slams and fedex only one.Nadal never cried when lost the match like fedex do in Austrlian open he was begging there for slam.Look at nadal statement after loosing in french open victories never count its loss that make victories important.If nadal cant win or emulate any records of slams he never cry like fedex and Rafaa will rule the tennis scene for next 2-3years.People are talking about fedex gaining no.1 ranking again stop day dreaming.No one in history of tennis regain no.1 after losing it.It happend only once that so lendl did it.Accept the reality
Re: people are naive
by kareem on Jun 06, 2009 08:28 PM
average tennis??did u see that slices, eventhough he nowhere near to great form..that is enough to beat soldering in staringht sets
Re: people are naive
by Sameer K on Jun 06, 2009 07:45 PM
By Jimmy Connors': "In an era of specialists - you're either a clay court specialist, a grass court specialist or a hard court specialist... or you're Roger Federer".
I dont think Santa and Banta Singht are needed by Federer to predict or praise him.
Anyways the King of Clay couldnt even reach semi finals of French Open clay tournament and lost to Federer in Madrid on clay last month. This is Federer's 4th consecutive final and prior to that he lost in semifinal, this is Federer's 5 year French Open record.
Re: people are naive
by Srini Krish on Jun 06, 2009 04:17 PM
Anyway Fed is going to win french..He has beaten Nadal in Madrid open(Clay court in Straight sets) ..What more you want?? It is great comeback..Fedrer Cried, but he never said that the other Nadal cheated..He told he loved the game so much that he dosent want to lose. Even though he is playing avg tennis, he is still beating everybody..that is amazing..Even though nadal won 6 at 23, let see if he can maintain that consistency.
Re: Re: people are naive
by bitu singh on Jun 06, 2009 04:31 PM
he is crying coz begging to god why you made that man.As he felt that nadal is only gud on clay and that title is his.For you info those open are only of three sets not five one also last year too fedex has beaten nadal in hamburg open before coming to French.Same this year also.Nedal will remain there..soderling is wining.
Re: Re: Re: people are naive
by sreenu jennepalli on Jun 06, 2009 10:20 PM
This is for your info Fedex is going to win not only FRENCH OPEN even WIMBLEDON also. This is true and going to happen. As u criticising he is not a ordinary player he plays all kind of shots, not like Nadal who plays only backhand to Federer, one should have that courage and enough confidence to play like Federer. OK friend hardluck for you this time Federer is going to be the No.1 soon.
Re: Re: Re: people are naive
by suhas gogate on Jun 06, 2009 04:49 PM
i agree with you dude... he is the finest player i saw in recent times.... his drop shots like walking on cheese ... dude... will fed wins or not.. he is altime great
Re: people are naive
by jayanta banerjee on Jun 06, 2009 05:39 PM
Fedex should win more Grand Slams. This time, it will not be such a good luck for Nadal like 2008 at WIMBLEDON. Being #1 should not be a topmost for Fedex. Hope he will complete a treble in 2009 with remaining 3 slams! And hope Rafa be #1. Ok?
Re: people are naive
by True Blue on Jun 06, 2009 05:47 PM
Regaining the no 1 ranking has happened multiple times. Edberg and Becker traded the top spot in the 90s. Courier regained the spot after losing it, and Sampras and Agassi have also alternated in the no 1. spot in the the rankings. Get your facts right before commenting.
Re: people are naive
by jayanta banerjee on Jun 06, 2009 05:43 PM
Crying is his emotion buddy. That have nothing to do with his play. Poor fellow - you don't understand it? And - mid'2009 shows a big dip in NADAL's form. So, be worried for NADAL 's form, too! "6" to "13" can take a hell lot of time - or may be "LIFE LONG".
Re: It was a great match after Lendal-Sampras Wimbldon final!!
by True Blue on Jun 06, 2009 05:44 PM
I don't think Lendl ever played Sampras in a Grand Slam final, and definitely not at Wimbledon.Lendl was close to the end of his career during Sampras's ascent to the top.
feddy will win french open 2009 straight sets, for sure, soderling will stand nowhere against feddy...go feddy go...win ur 14th GS, and also 15th in wimbledon.
Re: feddy will win french open 2009 straight sets
by nt g on Jun 06, 2009 04:12 PM
It will be Four set in favour of Fedex score probably.... 6-4, 5-7, 6-3, 7-5 in favour of Fed...... So 14 for roger.
RAFA has been so good against roger especially in recent years...... but being a great not only beating genious like FEDEX... he needs to figth against MURRAY,DJOK,POTRO,and others also.... whenever he plays against any avg player there also he plays like a ultra defencive knows nothing oher than that.... making long rallis everytime and runnig million miles.... is tat really last long.....? can he play the same level at the age of 27 or 28 at which ROGER playing in almost all grandslam finals.......?
one needs to be realistic about roger...... he is above mount everest in terms of comparison to nadal.... c how nadal plays in high octane encounters(usually against minnows also) taking more than 30 sec before serving all the time(permessible time between points is about 20)...... one thing is sure that NADAL became popular and lovabel only cuz he Kept on beating ROGER...... when tennis was utterly predictable if ROGER plays in any tournaments......... SO now its not the same...... NOW let NADAL rule the game like swiss ace ruled,........ is htat possible????????? not even craziezt spanish fan could belive if say so.......? so decide where RAFA goes here after
Re: ITS SIGNALLING END OF RAFA DOMINATION????????????
by Anuraug Rathor on Jun 07, 2009 06:32 PM
Stupid Raju,your level of ignorance is comparable to none,a[part from your atrocious English.Nadal won all his grand slams after the same journey that Federer had when he won all his Grand Slams.You have to play consistently over 2 weeks and beat 6-7 players before you win a Grand Slam,you moron.No one wins by being defensive, and if someone can win 6 Grand Slams, on all surfaces by teh age of 22,beating the greatest player ever in 5 finals,by being defensive then it only speaks volumes about his talent.I certainly dont know what will happen when Nadal is 27-28...but you seem to know a lot about the future,can you tell me who will win the World Cup cricket in 2020?Football World Cup in 2040?Since you're the expert, I'm sure you ahve all teh answers.So quit simplifying matters, and enjoy the great rivalry between 2 greatly talented players.Even if Federer wins today he wont be happy because he couldnt beat Nadal.They never degrade each other,but I wish their fans, specially the mentally deficient ones like Siddu Raju,would learn soemthing from them.
Will sombody calculate this for me? Assuming that Nadal loses to Federer in Wibledon final, will Federer become no. 1 after Wimbledon? My estimation says they will be very close in terms of ATP points. Federer might even overhaul Nadal. Right now, Nadal is at 14960, and Federer is at 10470. Having lost in 4th round here, Nadal stands to lose about 1200 points. Since he has chosen to miss Queens', he loses another 450, and reaches ~13200. after losing Wimbledon, he will reach 12500-12600. Federer, if he wins tomorrow, will earn 600 to reach 11070. If he retains Halle, and wins Wimbledon, he reaches 11670. Is there a mistake somewhere?
Re: aishwarya patil
by VASUDEVAN V on Jun 06, 2009 01:04 PM
I am sure Federer must be more interested in getting the French and Wimbledon crowns back and not about the no.1 position. From here on what matters to Federer is only the Grand Slams and his performance on that grand stage!
Re: Re: Re: aishwarya patil
by siva kumar on Jun 08, 2009 09:08 PM
if roger wins wimbledon.. there will be very less points difference between roger and rafa... but rafa has to lose early..
Re: aishwarya patil
by ajjampudi satyaprasad on Jun 06, 2009 06:00 PM
If feddie wins 2morro he'll get 2000 points again if he wins wimbledon he'll get another 2000 points....most probably he will defeat Nadal.Feddie is unstoppable in Grass....
