Discussion Board

Who was better: Federer or Roddick?


Total 200 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Guest
greatest era of sports for us
by Guest on Jul 06, 2009 08:47 AM

I would like to congratulate everybody to be born in an era which will be known as the greatest in the world for sporting wonders.We are the people who are so lucky that we watched Sachin,Roger,pete sampras,ronaldinho,tiger woods and many other greats making history.
I am thanking god for this. Really these are not just records for us, these people are those watching whom i have grown up. Yesterday match i would rather say that it was fed's bad luck that he could not play as good as Andy but still his below avg game is able to manage it for him.I saw him in Rolex ad and he was looking amazing.But i think in true sense modelling might be affecting his game. Although he is really a model having great looks, But i think he should wait for sometime to enter in modelling and should concentrate on tennis as nadal will be soon coming back and I want to see FEd defeating Nadal in the Frech Open finals 3-0.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ramkrishna
second set
by ramkrishna on Jul 06, 2009 08:45 AM

ande was good, federer gone but in tie breaker that roddick lost his cool . just one point loss in second set cost him , and history also created by federer. federer won by opponents mistake , rather his game is not so good ,as a true champion. power and volly game of john macenroe was the best in any wimbledon final.1981

    Forward  |  Report abuse
x
Nadal removed from top spot
by x on Jul 06, 2009 08:43 AM

Rafael Nadal has been removed from the top spot by Federer. If Nadal fails to play very soon then even Murray, Roddick should be able to over-take him.

So Nadal fans pray for his fast recovery.... knees are definetly very delicate and pains a lot when tendonitis affects it.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
prodosh sen
Luck prevailed!
by prodosh sen on Jul 06, 2009 08:42 AM

Inspite of tons of efficiency, Roddick did not have 'that ounce of luck to beat Federer.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
abhijeet solke
enuf federer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by abhijeet solke on Jul 06, 2009 08:20 AM  | Hide replies

it ws abt time roddick won!! federer has had his share of titles...now it ws roddick's time!
stop bein selfish federer!!
roddick-ur time will soon come!!
JAI HO RODDICK!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
shan mugam
Re: enuf federer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by shan mugam on Jul 06, 2009 09:24 AM
Well, said Roger is playing for Record. You should play Sports in a Sportive manner.
Remember, he never allowed Nadal to Celebrate in the Aus Open, he was crying as if he lost everything in the World. How can we say he is a Champion.

And even in Yesterday match, he broken Roddick Serve only one, where as Andy broken his Serve twice (To me I see this way The Champion was Broken Twice, even then he won the match because of opp. mistake.)

Never ever call him as a True Champion.

But one thing is sure, Roger Time is over. Just watch Andy in US open he will definetly Kill Roger their in home, and it will not stop their it will continue.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sastry Prakash
Who was better - RF or AR
by Sastry Prakash on Jul 06, 2009 08:10 AM  | Hide replies

Andy Roddick was playing much above his game and it gives an impression he played a better game (may be true!!) but one must remember that RF held on, inspite making so many unforced errors. Best of Roddick was'nt good enough for average game of RF.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
chunky
Re: Who was better - RF or AR
by chunky on Jul 06, 2009 08:26 AM
it looked like a average game of RF becos roddick did not give him a chance to play. Roddick's serves were superb. many times RF got break point chance but he couldnt make it bcos of roddick's amazing serves.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
elamaran elango
Roddick deserved today..But fedex is the champ
by elamaran elango on Jul 06, 2009 08:06 AM

Sports is really cruel, I am great fan of federer but after witnessing the Final roddick deserved to win this title this year but Federr is such a champion who wins even when he plays at around 80% .

The main reason why roddict played so well is he took the game to Federer,he was dominating the proceedings..

I never saw federer play below par in finals except those French finals..


Nadal..You cannot win matches with your legs and Knees and they will worn out but not the class federer posses...


    Forward  |  Report abuse
arijit mullick
Who was better ?
by arijit mullick on Jul 06, 2009 07:52 AM

Federer is the champ but on sunday andy was superb ........bt the luck was with federer...


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Aruna Gaitonde
Wimbledon
by Aruna Gaitonde on Jul 06, 2009 07:51 AM

Roddick ofcourse! Federer was plain lucky.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
tanudeep mallick
Federer v/s Roddick
by tanudeep mallick on Jul 06, 2009 07:50 AM

In the final, Andy Roddick played better than Federer. The natural flow of RF was missing, I would say it was 80% of what he plays naturally, but still he managed to win by simply hanging around. One has to give credit to that.
The same big-serving Roddick was nullified easily in the previous two wimbldon meetings of them. Even, RF defeted big-hitter Mark Philipposis in his first wimbledon win, who created a lot of wave in that year. RF has the ability to beat them in style but it was that kind of a day when everything was not with him. Roddick played very well but it's unfortunate for him that he is player of Roger Federe's era.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 200 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Write a message