RE:Criticism
by HI on Aug 14, 2008 11:14 AM
bhagwat definately yes, becoz she is seasoned. but as abhinav himself pointed out shooting is 99% luck, 1 % training.
Olympic torch india main sharukh khan, Aiswarya raye le kar dodte hai, sports-person nahin. Unko hi bhejo olympics main, thumke marne ke liye. Is desh main Bolywood, cricket, tuchi politics aur andhwishwashi regligious cults ke alawa kuch aur nazar nahin aata.
RE:42nd of 43 competitors
by Nagesh Bhagwat on Aug 14, 2008 11:10 AM
She did not come last. She needs your love and support, not your criticism. She tried her best, though she was only 50% fit. she was on painkillers.
Can you not understand these things, you inconsiderate Tamilian
RE:42nd of 43 competitors
by Hemant on Aug 14, 2008 11:14 AM
you should not find excuse mr. bhagwat....at highest lever you should not take part if you are not 100% fit....dont paint it as regional issue
RE:42nd of 43 competitors
by Senthil palani on Aug 14, 2008 11:12 AM
Another crap ? Are you justifying 42 in 45? If She was not fit why did she went for the event ?
Anjali & Sania Mirza are picked on basis of only glamour not performance and the result are in fornt of u all. If we are given chance to participate we are sure that we will definately not win medal but also not bluff like anjali claminging her good chance to win medal and wasting govt money.
RE:Anjali & Sania Mirza
by Prem Padro on Aug 14, 2008 11:10 AM
Thats false, is their anyone else to beat them in India. They are Number 1 of India. In addition to their sporting talent they are good looking. It unfair to pick on their good looks.
RE:Anjali & Sania Mirza
by namrat gaonkar on Aug 14, 2008 11:58 AM
please do not compare with indians.we al know what are the standards of our sportmen compared to our counterparts in the world. Of course their govts too help by providing good infrastuctures etc. Yopu ar right when u say //it is unfair to pick them based on their looks//pick them on merit// When sanis herself was not fully fit she should not have represented the country.Abt anjali the less said the better.. She is mere tourist rather then a acheiver..
I saw her interview and she was smiling and talking about beijing beauty. She has no seriousness, and the govt has given all facilities. and also khel ratna in 2004. While people are jumping to criticise sania eeven though she gave 100 percent after injury, anjali has been pampered. And age 35 plus, she should retire
RE:Anjali...most overated shooter in the planet
by chander mohan sharma on Aug 14, 2008 11:05 AM
Enough of passengers masquerading as players ! Send a minimum contingent if we can not win more medals. Sport system in India , not withstanding, Abhinav could win due to his own dedication and hard work.Every one is happy that at least one medal is won. What a shame!
RE:Anjali...most overated shooter in the planet
by shyam jha on Aug 14, 2008 11:01 AM
well said. Anjali and Anju Bobby George are two highly overrated players of our country. But I think even Sania was not serious for olympic. Saina was good
RE:Anjali...most overated shooter in the planet
by HI on Aug 14, 2008 11:03 AM
anjali is already getting enough love of officials for selection. we all know how she bullied into getting khel ratna.
RE:Anjali...most overated shooter in the planet
by HI on Aug 14, 2008 11:01 AM
i agree. Anjali is always on paid holiday. she has some strong influence or using her charms to get selected. I am sure she shal be on paid trip to london in 2012 also.
We know nobdy is there in India to give a good performance except in big interviews, Media and while taking donation from public/govt. So Rediff & other Media should report only good performances .. rest we know what will happend to these guys .. poor, poor and out.
