RE:good joke
by amit jain on Sep 25, 2007 07:42 PM
hans hans ke pet naa phat jaae. look at yograj, yuvraj's father he wud have turned bradman in his grave.
RE:good joke
by amit jain on Sep 25, 2007 07:44 PM
somebody please restrain yuvraj's father. he is seen more on TV than manmohan singh or advani. binaa bulaae hi studio pahunch jaata hain.
Rediff.com requires headline writers for immediate appointment.
Work involves goin through the articles written by other authors who dont have time to put proper headlines and who are currently working directly under marketing department.
You will be required to work independently. Make sure that when readers click a headline in rediff.com home page , the related artcile has some relevance to the headlines it was highlighted with.
The headline does not make any sense when there is no concrete evidence to support it.
Actually I am a better player than federer but I never won anything even in my school. But this does not stop me from claiming myself as a better player and I expect an interview call from rediff
R U Ready To Go ? YES....I FOUND ALL GRE8 NEW FULL HINDI MOVIES, NICE VIDEOS, FUN AND MORE HOT STUDFF ON http://www.mh12.com/movies ....... HAVE A NICE DAY.
I feel its a bit exaggeration and arrogance to say Anand was better than Borg(won eleven grandslams including five wimbledons in a row)and Connors (8 grandslams). Borg and Connors are considered as legends in international tennis. They have won so many grandslams and stood out among so many talented players of their era. But this doesnt mean Anand is any less talented. Amritraj brothers are a name to reckon with but on par with Borg and Connors. With all due respect to Anand and Vijay from the bottom of my heart...
RE:Better than Borg and Connors
by kraft on Sep 25, 2007 04:14 PM
He never said Anand was better than Borg and Connors. He said Vijay had beaten them individually many times, but could not maintain that spree over a WEEK in Grand Slams.That is fair enough.Even Vijay is a Modest guy and never has claimed himself to be the Greatest.But VIJAY certainly was one of India's MOST Talented Tennis Player after R.Krishnan.
RE:Better than Borg and Connors
by Surya Kiran on Sep 25, 2007 05:12 PM
Mr. Kraft, Read again the article which say "Vijay has beaten Borg, Connors and McEnroe many times. He was as good, or even better than Borg and Connors."
RE:Leander Bhupthi and Sania
by kraft on Sep 25, 2007 04:20 PM
Compared to the achievements of Ramanathan Krishnan,Vijay and his brother the present generation [like Paes,Sania,etc.] have not done much though they get good Publicity and Money.
RE:Leander Bhupthi and Sania
by Manish Kapur on Sep 25, 2007 09:43 PM
Ramesh Krishnan was the best spinner of the tennis ball. His opponents used to confuse the game to be table tennis.Although not succesful he was huge entertainment for his peculiar slow spinning style of tennis.
Borg - 11 Grand Slam Wins, World Number 1 for 109 combined weeks Connors - 8 Grand Slam Wins, World Number 1 for 160 consecutive weeks, 270 combined weeks!! McEnroe - 7 Grand Slam Wins, World Number 1 for 170 combined weeks Vijay - 0 GS Wins. Finals - 0. Semi-Finals - 0. Highest Ranking achieved - 16.
Why this stupid non-standard article is posted in rediff. Dont u have news? TAke the sanp of all india cricket team of the field and post it it will be better
