Had enough of political and court interference on our Hindu culture.Courts and Politicians are doing everthing to spoil HINDU faith.Why the same they are not putting the churches and masjids under introspection with regards to their moneis flowing in for their faith.Enough its time to rise strong and voice out loud and tell the world we cannot be just side lined.
Re: HIGH TIME
by daniel thorat on Oct 20, 2018 07:38 PM
It is necessary to understand what we mean when we talk of our Hindu culture. What we have and are proud of is our Indian culture. When there are people following different and conflicting customs, religions, deities, eat dogs in North East and have been consuming beef for ages, we cannot make a sweeping statement about Hindu culture. Masjid and churches are definitely subject to all the things dictated by our Constitution. Introspection is a weak suggestion. The demand of our Constitution is the ultimate power for all Indians to behave.
Yes very true. A temple known for culture, tradition and discipline. Unfortunately many do not know about the temple. CPI(M) led left front ruling the state want to crush believers and destroy faith. As all know the CM is in UAE requesting funds from the rich. Last month he was in USA requesting funds and no one knows how much he received. Yes Sabarimala is not discriminatory at all. Let the temple remain with its tradition and practices. Lets keep away from it.
Re: 'Sabarimala temple is not discriminatory at all'
by NEELAKANTAN R on Oct 19, 2018 07:46 PM
Not requesting but begging for party funds. This is now only state the commis are in power and if they do not get money their chapter would be closed for ever.
Re: Re: 'Sabarimala temple is not discriminatory at all'
by kuldip singh on Oct 20, 2018 07:16 PM
Ultimately bjp going to benefit out of this. It is a to ploy to create a rift among hindus and people with vengeance vote against left wings.
Re: Re: 'Sabarimala temple is not discriminatory at all'
by kuldip singh on Oct 20, 2018 07:16 PM
Ultimately bjp going to benefit out of this. It is a to ploy to create a rift among hindus and people with vengeance vote against left wings.
Re: Re: 'Sabarimala temple is not discriminatory at all'
by kuldip singh on Oct 20, 2018 07:16 PM
Ultimately bjp going to benefit out of this. It is a to ploy to create a rift among hindus and people with vengeance vote against left wings.
Re: 'Sabarimala temple is not discriminatory at all'
by daniel thorat on Oct 20, 2018 07:41 PM
Sabarimala is definitely and fully discriminatory and there is no logic whatsoever to say otherwise. If one says that Sabarimala is not discriminatory, then that means that the Supreme Court is discriminatory. That would be a crime subject to punishment.
Pandalam Trust comes from pandiya dynasty vis a vis pancha pandavas well known for gambling and loosing their native place gambia. Now they speak of sanctum sanctity of Ayappan Temple.
Re: Pandalam Trust
by NJayakumar on Oct 19, 2018 04:34 PM
conversion factory products cannot understand Hinduism, with vast scriptures, and its sanctity. Better keep away from what should be done in temples.
Re: Re: Pandalam Trust
by amit shah on Oct 19, 2018 05:00 PM
correct. the very fact that they converted reflects upon their intellectual bankruptcy; let alone spiritual bankruptcy.
Re: Re: Pandalam Trust
by ASHOK UPADHYAYA on Oct 19, 2018 05:02 PM
Tomorrow there will be their turn and also of other religions also.... to change traditions n establish equality....
Re: Re: Pandalam Trust
by daniel thorat on Oct 20, 2018 07:43 PM
Temple devdasis was one of the things that were done in temples and they are not stopped. Similar thing needs to happen to Sabarimala.
Pandalam Trust comes from pandiya dynasty vis a vis pancha pandavas well known for gambling and loosing their native place gambia. Now they speak of sanctum sanctity of Ayappan Temple.
Re: Pandalam Trust
by on Oct 19, 2018 08:06 PM
Mr. Lawrence, please think twice before pronouncing something on social media. Pandiya dynasty existed between 903 to 1820 AD, whereas pandavas relates to 400 BC in the great epic Mahabharat. Please don't make a mockery of yourself.
Re: Pandalam Trust
by on Oct 19, 2018 08:31 PM
Mr. Lawrence, please think twice before pronouncing something on social media. Pandiya dynasty existed between 903 to 1820 AD, whereas pandavas relates to 400 BC in the great epic Mahabharat. Please don't make a mockery of yourself.
Pandalam Trust comes from pandiya dynasty vis a vis pancha pandavas well known for gambling and loosing their native place gambia. Now they speak of sanctum sanctity of Ayappan Temple.
The Supreme Court has erred in its judgment in Sabrimala case and it needs to be more sensitive and precise in its findings because, perhaps, this is the only institution that has no accountability and whose verdicts are final without appeal. Public protests on these matters are within the Constitutional domain and must be continued with reason that sends a message to Supreme Court that it needs to look into this matter and correct it if there is a legal error it has caused. 3 or 5 judges cannot be more correct than an entire domain of society which includes people from all genders.
Re: accept it
by P S SHAH on Oct 19, 2018 04:17 PM
Agree with your view. Justice Rohington nariman, One of the five judges who has given the judgement allowing entry for all women in Sabrimala temple. If any petition come before him for allowing every one to Parsi Fire temple Will he agree with the petitioners ? Justice Indu malhotra who has not agreed with other judges has justify her decision for her disagreement in her judgement of 74 pages.She has clearly written that matters of deep religious faith and sentiments must not be ordinarily interferred by the courts. I wonder, why Travancore Devaswom Board, one of the main respondent who were in favour of continuing restriction do not want to prefer filing of review petition against judgement.
Re: accept it
by NEELAKANTAN R on Oct 19, 2018 07:50 PM
The problem is that when only few days are left for retirement the Bench headed by Mishra gave the verdict. Now he is not having any problem. Six month before retirement no judge should be allowed to give any major verdict. After all they are also government servant and the general conduct rules applies to them also.
Even the BJP cannot overturn the SC verdict and SC may not agree to a review.In that case what use is Hindu consolidation ? Where will the consolidated Hindus go ? Even the MHA has asked for the SC verdict to be followed.
Re: NO way out.
by ashok bare on Oct 19, 2018 03:45 PM
In the case of Atrocity Act SC has reversed it's own decision then why can not decision in Sabarimala case be reversed? In any case people's wishes are supreme
Re: NO way out.
by Abhishek Shridhar Mishra on Oct 19, 2018 03:58 PM
SC can certainly revisit its decision. The moot question here is about rituals not discrimination against women.SC was not concerned about rituals whilst it gave its judgement.This needs re-examination. Moreover the restriction is only against certain age group not women in entirety.
Re: NO way out.
by Abhishek Shridhar Mishra on Oct 19, 2018 03:59 PM
SC can certainly revisit its decision. The moot question here is about rituals not discrimination against women.SC was not concerned about rituals whilst it gave its judgement.This needs re-examination. Moreover the restriction is only against certain age group not women in entirety.
Re: NO way out.
by P S SHAH on Oct 19, 2018 04:20 PM
The people has clearly shown their strength that any decisions of even Apex court can not be forced upon them even with use of police force.
