Discussion Board

'Sabarimala temple is not discriminatory at all'


Total 66 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
nihas pasha
not surprising
by nihas pasha on Oct 21, 2018 12:16 AM

its not surprising to see the behaviour of this hyynnduus. when it came to supreme courts decision on teen taalaak, all hyynndduus were so gaga and rasping together in one voice for courts decision. now when the tide has turned and its their turn, they are showing their true colours. seems like hyynndduu women wont ever get justice in this country. shame on this people.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
daniel thorat
Sabarimala and the head priest
by daniel thorat on Oct 20, 2018 07:23 PM  | Hide replies

Kandararu Rajivaru, the priest seems to be telling things which just cannot be proved by any evidence whatsoever. An Indian citizen who does not care for the Supreme Court of India and our Constitution cannot be expected to tell any truth at all. He is helping PM Modi/RSS to somehow win elections, lest the whole big baloon of empty slogans and false information fed to ur will burst !

    Forward  |  Report abuse
daniel thorat
Re: Sabarimala and the head priest
by daniel thorat on Oct 20, 2018 07:31 PM
The temple is totally discriminatory without any reason whatsoever.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ASHOK UPADHYAYA
Re: Re: Sabarimala and the head priest
by ASHOK UPADHYAYA on Oct 20, 2018 08:13 PM
True ... descrminatiin of any kind should be removed in all religions so no one is required to approach courts...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bhask Tripathi
Partial verdict
by Bhask Tripathi on Oct 20, 2018 06:43 PM  | Hide replies

There are as many as 6 temples in Kerela where Men are banned from entry and women can worship. This is due to Sthal purana of respective temples. SC judges are just playing with hindu sentiments. They would never dare to do this with any other community. Christians allow only Men to become "fathers" in the church. Isn't that discriminatory to these corrupt judges ?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
piri
Re: Partial verdict
by piri on Oct 20, 2018 07:27 PM

Come to the point, you dunce.

Dont beat around the bush !

Any idea who approached the SC for a direction to the Sabarimala temple to allow women of all ages to worship there ?

It was a group of women members of the RSS in 2006 !

And, any idea how the RSS and numerous parivar organisations reacted initially to the SC verdict on September 28th ?

They welcomed the verdict and expressed their welcome in their publications such as the Janmabhumi !

And when did they make an U turn ?

When they sensed that the Kerala state govts move to implement the SC verdict might hopefully be used to try and divert the attention of people in Kerala from the disasters of demonization, jobless growth in the economy, acute farm crisis, steep rise in prices, the huge Rafale scam, etc and to try and increase the measly 10.4 percent vote share of the BJP in Kerala !

Have a doubt about these things ?

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
daniel thorat
Re: Re: Partial verdict
by daniel thorat on Oct 20, 2018 07:33 PM
Absolutely truthful comment. This diabolical scheming done by the PM Modi/RSS/BJP etc. needs to be noticed by the people. How long can falsehood rule a nation?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
israel ali
Re: Re: Partial verdict
by israel ali on Oct 20, 2018 08:44 PM
you are 100 percent right. These politician did not had any MUDDAA to raise and judiciary helped them. Absolutely defying the Constitution taking the benefit of equality but what about religious protections. All protections have been put aside.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
thomas abraham
SABARIMALA AND PANDALAM DYNASTY
by thomas abraham on Oct 20, 2018 11:01 AM  | Hide replies

Sabarimala was under Pandalam kingdom earlier. later it became under Travancore dynasty and after independence it is under the President of India.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
piri
Re: SABARIMALA AND PANDALAM DYNASTY
by piri on Oct 20, 2018 07:06 PM

What you missed to mention is that the Travancore dynasty handed over the Sabarimala temple along with 47 other temples to the TDB in 1949.

The Travancore dynasty, that chose to opt to remain as an independent kingdom when the Instrument of Accession was handed to the various princely states in 1946, was content with control over the now world famous Sri Padmanabhan swamy temple with its immense treasure !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
piri
Re: BJP spokespersons on every Malayalam TV
by piri on Oct 19, 2018 10:37 PM

7. Why did the Union ministers Arun Jaitley and Maneka Gandhi welcome the SC verdict ?

8. Why did the BJP govt in Maharashtra quickly implement the recent Bombay high court order for allowing women entry into the Shani Shingnapur temple - a temple where women were not allowed to worship for 400 years ? Why was there no fuss at all from the BJP or from the RSS ?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 66 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Write a message