The baloon of blatant lies by Congressi and excretion stuck wagging tailing corrupt, pervert and SOULS sold out media to create a turmoil out of a non-issue, has got punctured ... where hiding is rediff editor in chief, in manhole of sewage line and drinking its contents ???
The baloon of blatant lies by Congressi and wagging excretion stuck tails of corrupt, pervert and SOULS sold out media, to create a turmoil out of a non-issue, has got punctured ... where hiding is rediff editor in chief, in manhole of sewage line and drinking its contents ???
The baloon of blatant lies by Congressi and wagging excretion stuck tails of corrupt, pervert and SOULS sold out media, to create a turmoil out of a non-issue, has got punctured ... where hiding is rediff editor in chief, in manhole of sewage line and drinking its contents ???
It is all humbug.It is to be seen that the four-five judges who went public on judiciary,would have been penalised for going public on internal issues.In fact,the way Mr.Kapil Sibal and party prefered the above judges to hear many cases simply means that they are in cohort with each other.The judges who went public are the puppets of the opposition.They wanted just to threaten the judiciary via CJI impeachment for their own goods through failure of bench fixing . Unfortunate state of affairs!
Re: CJI impeachment and relief
by Krishnan on May 08, 2018 09:10 PM
As if CJ was worried about these comedians. Even the black sheets in judiciary taking order from congress and left could not harm him except shout T the top of the voice
Re: Re: CJI impeachment and relief
by P S SHAH on May 08, 2018 09:19 PM
The communists are rejected almost everywhere in this country for last 70 years. They are aware that they have absolutely no scope to come to power at the center. This people want to controleducational institutions and jinfluence judiciary. The people of this country should keep a watch on their activities and must not allow them to succeed in their mission.
Re: Pidi folding its tail
by P S SHAH on May 08, 2018 09:21 PM
The person behave like an owl will come back only after mid night to continue his nonsense
Re: Rediff journalism
by Pukuta Mestri on May 08, 2018 08:13 PM
Exactly. But rediff refused to publish my comments. In fact it is face saver for Sibals of grand old corruption party
Re: Rediff journalism
by P S SHAH on May 08, 2018 08:52 PM
It was stupidity to file petition challenging decision of Chairman of Rajya Sabha ignoring powers vested to the Chairman, Rajya Sabha to conduct the business of the house. They also forgot that as per article of 122 (2) , no courts of law has any jurisdiction to challenge his decision as per the power vested to himby the constitution. Both Sibal and mischievous Prashant Bhushan must be aware of this, however, they are only interested in playing dirty politics only. Prashant Bhushan wanted the bench headed by his favourite Justice Chelameshwar to hear the matter. Now he want to know who constituted the five members bench and want to challenge this also. This will continue till Justice Dipak Mishra retire on 2nd October, 2018. Meanwhile, the leader of Gang of Four judges who staged revolt against CJI will retire next month and Justice Kurian Joseph and Justice Lokur by the end of this year. Do Prashant Bhushan has common sense that if Justice Mishra can not be part of five member bench to hear petition against him, how the four judges who are totally bias against CJI can be allowed to be a part of five members bench. Now I feel, Kejriwal was totally right ion throwing out Prashant Bhushan from AAP. This man , who was badly assaulted in his chamber in Supreme Court but didn’t do anything or had filed any complaints against the assailants but is more interested in fighting fior others.
Re: CJI
by Pukuta Mestri on May 08, 2018 08:15 PM
When CJI asked Sibals to mind his tone during the argument on delaying Ayodya hearing, this is the revenge Sibal took. It is loud and clear what Congress stands for and how rediff portrays it to public.
Re: Re: CJI
by P S SHAH on May 08, 2018 09:23 PM
Kapil Sibal is not count among the top 10 eminent counsels of the country. He is a big show man only. His main client now a days is his party.
Why Kapil Sibal wants to know who constituted the bench for hearing the impeachment petition? When he was a Congress minister whether he used to get involved in such things? Hope Congress will not write its own obituary by trying to dictate the judiciary.
Re: Kapil Sibal
by Clear Mind on May 08, 2018 06:57 PM
If the CJI himself sets up the bench to hear the case that involves his impeachment, then there is a conflict of interest. That is why who constituted the bench becomes important.
Re: Re: Kapil Sibal
by Ramesh Joshi on May 08, 2018 08:13 PM
Then why withdrawal of petition? They could have ascertained and then withdrew. My question is why he should interfere in the process of law
Re: Re: Re: Re: Kapil Sibal
by P S SHAH on May 08, 2018 09:08 PM
Sibal consider himself to be a senior counsel but could not quash complaints against Gandhi’s and others in case filed by Dr Swamy in National Herald case.Dr Swamy is not a lawyer practicing in Higher courts but he argued his case successfully against both Abhishek Manu Singhavi and Kapil Sibal and did not allow them to succeed in quashing the complaints.
Re: Re: Kapil Sibal
by Pukuta Mestri on May 08, 2018 08:20 PM
Point 1: CJI is the master of roster Point 2: 5 judges went against CJI can not be trusted that they will be unbiased against the person whom they revolted. Point 3: CJI himself not part of the 5 judge bench constituted.
So where is the conflict unless you want what Sibal also want; ie., one of those judges who revolted against CJI, be part of panel.
Re: Re: Re: Kapil Sibal
by P S SHAH on May 08, 2018 09:11 PM
Whoever has constituted five members bench played a master stroke which compelled the petitioners to withdraw the petition.
Re: Re: Re: Kapil Sibal
by P S SHAH on May 08, 2018 09:12 PM
Whoever has constituted five members bench played a master stroke which compelled the petitioners to withdraw the petition.
Re: Re: Re: Kapil Sibal
by P S SHAH on May 08, 2018 09:12 PM
Whoever has constituted five members bench played a master stroke which compelled the petitioners to withdraw the petition.
Re: Re: Kapil Sibal
by P S SHAH on May 08, 2018 09:03 PM
Clear mind, think it with clear mind. Every one has seen the behaviour of four senior judges who called press conference during the court’s working hours, without prior intimation to the head of Judiciary to stage revolt against him. As per common knowledge, if CJI can not be part of five members bench , so do the four senior judges . Whoever constituted the bench has not done any random selection but gave job to hear the matter to next senior judges after this four most senior judges.However, as per three members bench decision delivered in April, 2018’ the judges are treated equally and none of the judges are designated as senior judges or junior judges. Let Prashant Bhushan, the mischievous counsel put all his futile efforts to impeach CJI till he complete his age of superannuation on2nd October, 2018 and retire as CJI after completing his full term.
Re: Re: Kapil Sibal
by P S SHAH on May 08, 2018 09:04 PM
Clear mind, think it with clear mind. Every one has seen the behaviour of four senior judges who called press conference during the court’s working hours, without prior intimation to the head of Judiciary to stage revolt against him. As per common knowledge, if CJI can not be part of five members bench , so do the four senior judges . Whoever constituted the bench has not done any random selection but gave job to hear the matter to next senior judges after this four most senior judges.However, as per three members bench decision delivered in April, 2018’ the judges are treated equally and none of the judges are designated as senior judges or junior judges. Let Prashant Bhushan, the mischievous counsel put all his futile efforts to impeach CJI till he complete his age of superannuation on2nd October, 2018 and retire as CJI after completing his full term.
Re: Re: Kapil Sibal
by Against Pseudos on May 10, 2018 08:48 AM
Clear Mind: How many judges since 1947 told you what happened behind the scenes in the court? Nehru effect?
