The President disqualifies 21 MLAs of Delhi AAP, the Delhi High Court admits petition against the order. Can the President's order be questioned by anyone ? Then there is no end .... Go to President against the Supreme Court/High Court ... then go to Supreme court against the President .... * Similarly when the VP has ruled against impeachment of CJI ... they should have approached the higher authority i.e., the President. How can the Supreme Court hear anything against the VP's order ? This seems like a joke ....
Re: iS tHIS a jOKE ? Where is the closure ???
by palanki narayana on May 07, 2018 09:23 PM
The Vice President made his order in his capacity as the Chairman of Rajya Sabha. If he erred in making the order (as claimed by the MPs) the matter must be decided by the Supreme Court. The President has no power in the domains that fall under the legislature or the judiciary.
Re: Re: iS tHIS a jOKE ? Where is the closure ???
by Nalin Kishore on May 07, 2018 10:42 PM
VP's order was against CJI's impeachment, so any representation against him has to go to HIS superior. How can it go to the CJI's domain when the complaint is against CJI?
Re: Re: Re: iS tHIS a jOKE ? Where is the closure ???
by palanki narayana on May 08, 2018 06:31 AM
Both the MPs and the Supreme Court seem to hold a different view. Hence the admission of the petition before the bench.
Re: iS tHIS a jOKE ? Where is the closure ???
by palanki narayana on May 07, 2018 09:24 PM
The Vice President made his order in his capacity as the Chairman of Rajya Sabha. If he erred in making the order (as claimed by the MPs) the matter must be decided by the Supreme Court. The President has no power in the domains that fall under the legislature or the judiciary.
Re: iS tHIS a jOKE ? Where is the closure ???
by NEELAKANTAN R on May 07, 2018 09:33 PM
NJAC Act passed by parliament and 50% of the state assemblies and passed by Rajya Sabha and accorded consent by president was struck down by SC judges. Now Sc judges feel that they have more power than president. is this democracy. Now the litigant lawyers want the case to be heard by a bench headed by a judge suggested by them. Is this correct. Where we are heading. Now as a common man I feel If now the case is rejected by the bench these two lawyers should be bared from practicing as advocates. Can this court do that?
Re: iS tHIS a jOKE ? Where is the closure ???
by NEELAKANTAN R on May 07, 2018 11:02 PM
NJAC Act passed by parliament and 50% of the state assemblies and passed by Rajya Sabha and accorded consent by president was struck down by SC judges. Now Sc judges feel that they have more power than president. is this democracy. Now the litigant lawyers want the case to be heard by a bench headed by a judge suggested by them. Is this correct. Where we are heading. Now as a common man I feel If now the case is rejected by the bench these two lawyers should be bared from practicing as advocates. Can this court do that?
This political party is now full of aged babies allied pappus and losing the common sense also and do not have idea how to go ahead and improve India. Accusing Chief Justice is hilarious in any country.
Re: Congress challenges
by kulbir labana on May 07, 2018 04:25 PM
The CJI is equal before the law. If there is even a hint of impropriety, then let it be decided in court. It will clear the matter once for all.
Con grass is repeatedly attempting to politicize judiciary. This tactics of fooling people will never work for "Con Grass", which is completely rejected by people.
Re: SHAME ON CON GRASS
by ishrat quadri on May 07, 2018 02:52 PM | Hide message
Only Modi has sole rights to fool India like you.
Re: Re: SHAME ON CON GRASS
by SUBRAT RATH on May 07, 2018 02:57 PM
Ishrat Quadri....if u feel insecured about the ruling of CJI then alike seculartards, u r most welcome to enter your beloved country Pakistan....One thing let it clear to all your secular baap that your baap is here called as MODI.
Re: SHAME ON CON GRASS
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on May 07, 2018 02:55 PM
Hahahahahaha!!!Dearest Modiji has been politicising the Indian Army by invoking the names of late FM cariappaaa,& Gen.Thimaayaaa only to get a few votes in Karnataka??????
Re: SHAME ON CON GRASS
by P S SHAH on May 07, 2018 03:07 PM
Dr karthikeyan, Congress and their counsel like kapil sibal and Prashant bhushan should very well read power of the Chairman of rajya sabha as vested to him under article of the constitution of India. As per article 122(2), none of the courts of this country has any jurisdiction to question his power exer by him as per his role as a Chairman of rajya sabha. Prashant bhushan is also a mischievous counsel. One can wonder why he has so much love and affection for Justice Chelameshwar and knowing power of CJI in allotment odd cases, he still time and again mention urgent hearing of his case before the bench headed by justice chelameshwar ? Now i agree with the decision of Kejriwal who rightly booted out Prashant bhushan from his party.
Re: SHAME ON CON GRASS
by P S SHAH on May 07, 2018 03:07 PM
Dr karthikeyan, Congress and their counsel like kapil sibal and Prashant bhushan should very well read power of the Chairman of rajya sabha as vested to him under article of the constitution of India. As per article 122(2), none of the courts of this country has any jurisdiction to question his power exer by him as per his role as a Chairman of rajya sabha. Prashant bhushan is also a mischievous counsel. One can wonder why he has so much love and affection for Justice Chelameshwar and knowing power of CJI in allotment odd cases, he still time and again mention urgent hearing of his case before the bench headed by justice chelameshwar ? Now I agree with the decision of Kejriwal who rightly booted out Prashant bhushan from his party.
Con grass is repeatedly attempting to politicize judiciary. This tactics of fooling people will never work for "Con Grass", which is completely rejected by people.
Re: Re: IMPEACHMENT MOTION
by Dipankar Mukherji on May 07, 2018 03:11 PM
Ishrat you must understand it is political fight by cong. Sikh riots case and Temple issue is coming up. Kapil sibal has lost many cases in SC. He is misguiding RAGA. The four Judges are all cong/communist sympathizers. They were unnecessarily involved in by kapil. Why no one supported Cong on issue of impeachment. Manmohan singhvi and Chidabaram refused to sign. This big game is being conceived directed and played by only kapil.
Re: Re: IMPEACHMENT MOTION
by Dipankar Mukherji on May 07, 2018 03:11 PM
Ishrat you must understand it is political fight by cong. Sikh riots case and Temple issue is coming up. Kapil sibal has lost many cases in SC. He is misguiding RAGA. The four Judges are all cong/communist sympathizers. They were unnecessarily involved in by kapil. Why no one supported Cong on issue of impeachment. Manmohan singhvi and Chidabaram refused to sign. This big game is being conceived directed and played by only kapil.
When they are in power ,they don't obey Courts when they are out they want the court should do their duty i.e; politics on their behalf after people rejected them from everywhere, they want some rulings through back door to take up the issue before public siting points against ruling govt., they have been successful in politicizing the apex court and the senior judges are playing in their hands, directly or indirectly.Instead they should face public, win election & put in chair as CJI their own man who can rule as per their choice.
Re: rediff...
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on May 07, 2018 02:07 PM
You must rather feel ashamed of selling your soul to Sangh_Privarites,who are the progeny of Aryan_Inavderssssssssssss??????????
