Re: Collegium for what ??
by pk kh on May 02, 2018 01:45 PM
long list of Cases against Congress are under trial...so congress trying all its old tactics of purgation even in opposition.
Re: Re: Collegium for what ??
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on May 02, 2018 02:47 PM
Rather they want to stop appointing BJP stooges,who are on a spree to abosolve SAnnghiiis from their cases!!!!!
Re: Re: Collegium for what ??
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on May 02, 2018 02:47 PM
Rather they want to stop appointing BJP stooges,who are on a spree to abosolve SAnnghiiis from their cases!!!!!
Re: Tend to agree .....
by piri on May 02, 2018 04:43 PM
Judiciary has nothing to do with the peoples mandate. It has to swear alleigance only to the constitution, in letter as well as in spirit !
It ought to be immune completely to the mandate given by the people to political parties.
It is prejudiced, majority of judges are from earlier members of earlier judges. These judges consider themselves above democracy and have no accountability. Intervention of democratic norm is a necessity in selecting any judge of HC and SC. If these judges feel that democratic norm will be biased then laws are defective, decision is given as per law not as per vim and fancy.
Re: Collegium
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on May 02, 2018 01:04 PM
As if Modijiee & Sangh Paribaaaar are staucchest supporters of the Democratic Principles????Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Re: Re: Collegium
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on May 02, 2018 02:49 PM
Thanks a lot Shahjii,you are a very nice person unlike your namesake,"Motabhaii"!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Re: Re: Collegium
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on May 02, 2018 02:49 PM
Thanks a lot Shahjii,you are a very nice person unlike your namesake,"Motabhaii"!!!!!!!!!!!!
It is prejudiced, majority of judges are from earlier members of earlier judges. These judges consider themselves above democracy and have no accountability. Intervention of democratic norm is a necessity in selecting any judge of HC and SC. If these judges feel that democratic norm will be biased then laws are defective, decision is given as per law not as per vim and fancy.
It is prejudiced, majority of judges are from earlier members of earlier judges. These judges consider themselves above democracy and have no accountability. Intervention of democratic norm is a necessity in selecting any judge of HC and SC. If these judges feel that democratic norm will be biased then laws are defective, decision is given as per law not as per vims and fancy.
It is above democracy, not acceptable to voters, Formula given by Modi appears to be acceptable. How judiciary can be superior to democratic norms, when democratic norm can change the laws through MPs.
It is above democracy, not acceptable to voters, Formula given by Modi appears to be acceptable. How judiciary can be superior to democratic norms, when democratic norm can change the laws through MPs.
4 senior most SC justices challenged and questioned him publicly. The impeachment reasons are definitely serious though they can be verified. Matters after matters seem to be decided by the CJI, with same two other brother justices, which has formed a pattern already. CJI has already expressed favourable inclinations towards what the govt. wants, includng rejection of Justice Joseph and approval of new Justice Indu Malhotra, directly nominated. This country will therefore be content if Justice Joseph is inducted as SC judge, defeating pressures and limitations being brought on the Judiciary
Re: The current CJI - a dispassionate opinion
by arungopal agarwal on May 02, 2018 10:49 AM
Justice Joseph is a biased judge, else common man does not have faith in judicial system, it only covers either the cases of high profile politicians, businessmen or spoiled by media. Common man knows that under the nose of a judge, daily Peshkar or Reader takes bribe, no action is taken to curb it.
