Discussion Board

Supreme Court verdict is a blow to Dalit, Adivasi rights


Total 92 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
sriram rao
Remove RESERVATION from the constitution
by sriram rao on Apr 01, 2018 08:20 AM

RESERVATION IS ACTUALLY PROMOTING CASTEISM BY FORCING THE GENERAL CATEGORY TO work in caste based profession so it is promoting more casteism in the society so remove reservation in its totality

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sumeet Dhillon
Very nice
by Sumeet Dhillon on Mar 31, 2018 03:24 PM

Giod point well made

    Forward  |  Report abuse
letyouknowbuddy
Blow...
by letyouknowbuddy on Mar 31, 2018 03:21 PM

Adiwasi's...ok, but dalit's are more arrogant nowadays.
Dalits should be kept away from reservation now.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Gautam Kar
OHHH SICKULAR AAKAR PATEL AGAIN
by Gautam Kar on Mar 30, 2018 11:23 AM

.
Why these presstitute media person are mum on SC decision on "SIKH RIOT CASES REOPEN" and subsequent trouble in some judges that they made a p
highly publicised revolt, supported by presstitute media persons like Aakar Patel ?????

Do they prefer to support the anarchy created by pervert corrupt Congress party ???

Time for this useless media persons to be thrown out.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
R  ponnabalam
Angling for Proselytization
by R ponnabalam on Mar 30, 2018 06:23 AM  | Hide replies

There is lot of concern for Hindu people for whom(from ??) the Hindus have by caste practices done injustice and those societally not well placed are also still remaining in their wrong practices like heavy drinking and the like.This is all for angling for proselytization with foreign fund flow R.PONNAMBALAM

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Chaitanya
The biggest atrocity of all = CaBaRet
by Chaitanya on Mar 29, 2018 10:59 PM


The BIGGEST atrocity of all, LONGEST-RUNNING, most ILLOGICAL, most UNFAIR, most UNETHICAL, is Caste Based Reservation (CaBaRet).

SC ST Atrocities has their own dedicated courts.

But the Atrocity of CaBaRet has NO COURT.

It is perpetrated and perpetuated by politicians who LACK SCRUPLES and LACK GUTS

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Chaitanya
Trying to support argument with IRRELEVANT facts
by Chaitanya on Mar 29, 2018 10:52 PM


The author says:

"Anyone who falsely charges a person with an offence with the intention of causing injury can face imprisonment for up to seven years"

How is this relevant to a false charge under the SC ST Atrocities Act? Where is the question of "causing injury"?

I believe has deliberately thrown in this irrelevant fact, KNOWING WELL THAT IT IS NOT RELEVANT in the context of SC ST Atrocities Act.

Unlikely to be a genuine mistake from the author.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Chaitanya
Notorious phrase "To take just one example"
by Chaitanya on Mar 29, 2018 10:45 PM


The author says "To take just one example..."

Why should we "take just one example" and agree with your conclusions?

That's a favorite ploy of authors, when statistics and logic are missing, or too weak to justify the author's points.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Chaitanya
Dreaded phrase "To take just one example"
by Chaitanya on Mar 29, 2018 10:43 PM


The author says "To take just one example..."

Why should we "take just one example" and agree with your conclusions?

That's a favorite ploy of authors, when statistics and logic fail.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Chaitanya
Faulty logic in the article
by Chaitanya on Mar 29, 2018 10:37 PM


The author arrives at a figure of 10%, and says that's too small to conclude "rampant misuse"

But his 10% is based on faulty logic.

He is comparing "non-conviction cases" with the "total cases registered or pending"

Note that the NUMERATOR in his comparison has the correct number, but his DENOMINATOR USES THE WRONG NUMBER.

Instead of

"total cases registered and pending",

it should be

"total cases closed (conviction plus non-conviction)"

With this FAULTY LOGIC, no wonder his percentage is only 10% (it is logically wrong to include open cases, and logically wrong to include all pending cases from all past years, in the denominator)

With the correct logic, it will be much higher percentage.

Before writing a lengthy article on a sensitive subject, I wish this author would pay some more attention to logical correctness.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 92 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message