Now this fellow saiffudin will say that XYZ had offered india too. It is that at what level the congress and group are bent upon breaking india And it is for the nests thousands of year will be a dream. Instead to grab neighbours properties Pakistan should first manage what it has got, which too is unable to manage . It doesn't what the neighbours to be happy too. Jai hind
NO Never.Nehru Agreed to give Kashmir to pak and patel is defended it.Nehru want to give it for his girlfirend.Now congress want to put all blame to Sardar patel.Actually it is game of bloody congress
Mr Saifuddin Soz is day dreaming or a lost confused personality. I am quite sure, when Mr Patel had told people abou Kashmir to Pakistan, then Mr Soz was physically present there. This is for sure that all kashmiri9 leaders are puppet of Pakistan and playing a dirty game and they should be answered in the same manner. That is all.
Re: Soz; a lost man
by deepak vora on Jun 26, 2018 03:00 PM
Soz might have misunderstood that shri Vallabh bhai patel would have told if you are unable to handle Pakistan please hand it over to us and we will show the developments we are able to achieve. Jai hind
Re: Soz; a lost man
by deepak vora on Jun 26, 2018 03:00 PM
Soz might have misunderstood that shri Vallabh bhai patel would have told if you are unable to handle Pakistan please hand it over to us and we will show the developments we are able to achieve. Jai hind
Maharaja harisingh didn't understood the seriousness and was not knowing his next step and was confused.
Pakistan and its tribals were sent to kashmir to capture it into its fold.
Maharaja signed the accession pact and joined india with the assurance of india to safeguard the interests of kashmir against pakistan.
Nehru had a soft corner for kashmiris and the land for its beauty, well as usual he was not firm, otherwise the issue called kashmir would not have existed to this date.
The cunning and trecheresness of pakistan muslim leadres is another reason.
Army from india was sent on the condition that kashmir should access to india. I think that the "plebiscite " issue must be a later day addition of vested interests.
Even otherwise kashmir was literally "won over" from pakistan / tribals with full concurrence of its ruler ,the maharaja HARISNGHJI.
From then on, and more so after loosing bangladesh, pakistan made its state policy to wound india in and out, mainly because its backwardness and not able to "live-up" to india.
The foolish policies followed by the congress government that followed had made the issue a perennial one, otherwise what to talk of the exodus of the bulk of pundits. Are they not kashmiris ?, let saifudin soz and his friends in congress think over it, as the only reason for their presence in politics was to self-serve.
The special powers is a farce, as a nation cannot go against it at any time and under any circumst
