Discussion Board

Why Kashmiris are agitating in favour of Art 35A


Total 50 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
venu  gopal
Article 35A , 370
by venu gopal on Aug 06, 2018 01:49 PM

These needs to be repeal immediately. The objections are coming from selected netas and separatists & their special stogies. They are making hay while sun shines. The people of J&K are not interested in such restrictions.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
PHILIP OOMMEN
Article 35 A
by PHILIP OOMMEN on Aug 06, 2018 01:45 PM  | Hide replies

There is a provision that outsiders cannot buy property in the north eastern state of Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Nagaland & Meghalaya. Even to enter some of these states Indian citizens have to take a permit known as Inner line permit. So why single out Kashmir and challenge the provision in supreme court.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
S M
Re: Article 35 A
by S M on Aug 06, 2018 04:50 PM
Why not? Kashmiris are allowed to own land and settle elsewhere in India. We will come to other states as well.. one state at a time

   Forward   |   Report abuse
pranab banerjee
Message to honorable CJI
by pranab banerjee on Aug 06, 2018 01:43 PM

MOST RESPECTFULLY SIR,
REPEAL 35A AND ALSO ART370 IMMEDIATELY.
THESE BLUNDERS OF HISTORY WILL DISINTEGRATE THE COUNTRY.
INDIA AS BHARAT WILL NOT EXIST.
A FEW LIBERALS, BIRIYANI DIPLOMATS. TUKRE-TUKRES AND RELIGIOUS PAN INDIA FANATICS SHOULD NOT DECIDE THE FATE OF THE MAJORITY AS THEY ARE DOING IN EVERY SPHERE.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
SuP
Scrapping the law is right
by SuP on Aug 06, 2018 01:42 PM

This type of law was made to keep people of Kashmir safe who were of sheep(soft) categories.Outsider could ruin these simple and sober people. But now scenario has changed and most of Kashmiris who were of sheep categories now became wolf categories and posing danger not only to their own people but equally danger to entire country.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Suresh Pachori
Article 35
by Suresh Pachori on Aug 06, 2018 01:38 PM

This article was inserted by Sheikh Abdullah, not a part of the deed of acession. So prima facie it has to go. Also the Muslims who are now in majority in Kashmir now having brutually driven out the last of the Hindus and sikhs by ethnic cleansing in the 90s, want this to remain for fear of losing the Majority Muslim status. so this article 35 A has to go.T
Thirdly is it not amazing that Kashmiris being Indians can buy properties anywhere in the rest of India,but Indians in rest of counrty cannot do so in zKashmir, cannot do so. So article 35 A and then 37 both have to go. india is for Indians including Kashmir and POK.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Beharilal Eshpuniyani
Article 35 A
by Beharilal Eshpuniyani on Aug 06, 2018 01:35 PM

Why was this article introduced in 1954(I.e. after 7 years of Independence)?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
SWAPNIL AVASARKAR
Article-35A
by SWAPNIL AVASARKAR on Aug 06, 2018 01:31 PM

If this would permitted. The POP Pak Occupied People will invite all their Community people who are living in India which are supporting Pak which are not "PAK" by humanity. & increase there power in JK & POK. So INDIA has to decide to keep them stay as they are.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
SAI RAM
Kasmiri
by SAI RAM on Aug 06, 2018 01:29 PM

Making property and fals ego

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 50 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
Write a message