The MPs who signed the notice belong to the Congress, the Nationalist Congress Party, the Communist Party of India-Marxist, the Communist Party of India, the Samajwadi Party, the Bahujan Samaj Party and the Indian Union Muslim League...all parties are deeply treacherous and biased.
Re: Faltu Congress Coalition to oppose BJP
by Upendra Shukla on Apr 21, 2018 03:40 PM
You are write. If this CJ would have either been SC/ST or Mullah, then these political parties would not have moved this impeachment. Great joke for these political parties, BJP is communal but Muslim League is secular.
Re: Re: Faltu Congress Coalition to oppose BJP
by R ponnabalam on Apr 21, 2018 03:50 PM
Another Joke.We shout from Rooftop that the European countries play their dirty politics by interfering in Syria and Iraq.But in 1940s what was done by Europeans to break the unity of purpose of India's Independence by them winning over SOME section of the then Indian people and all that caused in Kashmir of J&K states is to enable Secularism in India and is not anybody joining sides with that interfering Europeans R.Ponnambalam
Re: Faltu Congress Coalition to oppose BJP
by pk kh on Apr 21, 2018 09:08 AM
Congress has lost its mental balance....the oldest party of India is insane now...cannot do any developmental work just resorting to cheap tactics to malign NDA...
Re: Faltu Congress Coalition to oppose BJP
by R ponnabalam on Apr 21, 2018 11:08 AM
You seem to be a very lucky man! Surprise, that rediff has displayed it R.Ponnambalam
Re: Faltu Congress Coalition to oppose BJP
by R ponnabalam on Apr 21, 2018 11:14 AM
These are the best of parties in India.Law and order is a state subject.What all we hear about lynching rape etc is from----state.So we who were telling "Indira is india"," Punditji knows everything" get emboldened to tell that P.M. Modi should go and work like a constable in Unnao and kathuva .With all these parties in Power after 70yrs of rule we are a pauper Power whereas in 40yrs the then USSR had become a SUPER POWER.Moreover these parties--- may be Rediff won't dipsly it if I write.let me stop it here.R,Ponnambalam
"When SC judges themselves believe that the judiciary's independence"Judiciary's independence!!.How can there be Judiciary's independence when judges with case of false affidavit standing against him can get appointed as Judge in any country? It can be taken that at least from that day the appointment materialized we had ensured that we have no independent judiciary.Those effected that appointment should hold the cross.R.Ponnambalam
"thorough enquiry will be held so that truth alone triumphs."We should have a thorough enquiry as to how his appoint went through by elevation in the court in Odisha and thereafter to Supreme courtR.Ponnambalam
"thorough enquiry will be held so that truth alone triumphs."We should have a thorough enquiry as to how his appoint went through by elevation in the court in Odisha and thereafter to Supreme courtR.Ponnambalam
"as we are accountable to the people".Said Mr.Hamid Ansari as follows"Where do we stand on the ladder of equity? This is a question that citizens of the republic can ask the state after 70 years of legislating welfare laws and adjudicating measures to deliver social justice.""The ground reality is dismal," he(Hamid Ansari) said during the inaugural address at the 9th National Conference of the Indian Association of Lawyers here. while the top 10 percent controlled about 74 percent of it. The poorest 30 percent, meanwhile, had just 1.4 percent of the total wealth," he added.Please account for what Mr. Hamid Ansari has asked R.Ponnambalam
Mr. Sibal forgets as law minister & as a member of the Union Cabinet they had cleared MR. Dipak Misra for being elevated to the HC in Odisha when the false affidavit case was also known then.They then elevated him on recommendation of the Collegium to SC knowing full6 well that he will be CJI one day due to his seniority & date of birth. They expected him to be His Masters Voice during his tenure. This has backfired like. In the case of Mr. T.N. Seshan when he was nominated to EC & he held on to the rules strictly by the Book & Congress was shown the door on many aspects which they used to bend to their convenience. The 4 Judges who have given Press Conference against CJI have also been nominated by Congress. TRUE to their salt they have heard HIS MASTERS Voic3 DICTAKT & following instructions to the core. That is CONGRESS PARTY for you.
CJI acquired as an advocate by giving a "false affidavit"Then how the collegium cleared his name ?Who takes the responsibility for over looking that and recommending R.Ponnambalam
one of the most time wasting moves by Congress and Rahul should have scuttled this long ago. Instead he has dragged his party deeper into the mess.It's election time and Modi has made a few mistakes which the Congress must capitalise upon , but here we find Rahul grandstanding about the CJI. The common voter couldn't care less about who is CJI and even if he is impeached, it won't be a vote catching point for the opposition. Rahul simply does not know how to focus on the main issues at hand.
Re: Impeachment antics
by pk kh on Apr 21, 2018 09:00 AM
The MPs who signed the notice belong to the Congress, the Nationalist Congress Party, the Communist Party of India-Marxist, the Communist Party of India, the Samajwadi Party, the Bahujan Samaj Party and the Indian Union Muslim League...all parties are deeply treacherous and biased.
Re: Impeachment antics
by pk kh on Apr 21, 2018 09:02 AM
The MPs who signed the notice belong to the Congress, the Nationalist Congress Party, the Communist Party of India-Marxist, the Communist Party of India, the Samajwadi Party, the Bahujan Samaj Party and the Indian Union Muslim League...all parties are deeply treacherous and biased.
"When SC judges themselves believe that the judiciary's independence is under threat alluding to the functioning of the CJI, should we stand still and do nothing".Many Indians themselves believe that the judicial system of India stand compromised.The Govt.of India has not obeyed the judgement of the Supreme Court as regards the Cauvery Board.That is the most sensitive case to me.The riparian right of down stream state is denied by the Govt. of india.If I am given a chance to exercise my vote in this case I will vote against india.Will the President dismiss the Govt.of India because of misbehaviour?
