The author is highly biased towards his community. He has never mentioned the treatment meted out to majority community. They can hurt the majority communities sentiments in the name of freedom of speech. They mock the beliefs and practices followed by majorities lecturing about broad-mindedness but if someone from majority say something about their beliefs and practices then then they come out and destroy the public properties in the name of protests. Where their broad-mindedness goes at that time? In my childhood during 70s and 80s I never used hear ajaan(prayer call) but now at every nook and corner of the country you have to bear this nuisance. There is a saying, what goes comes back. History is proof that izlam has expanded through violence and in the present day too 98% terrorists are muzlims. They are now feeling the heat and suffering from the same atrocities which they did in the past. The Majority community is most tolerant and hence it has survived for millenniums and is currently the oldest religion in the world. But history is proof that whenever its survival is at stakes, it became one and fought as one. So, beware and do not write such one sided articles lest it backfires.
Every body has to come out of this intolerance and "live and let live happily" must be the motto. Humanity to struggle to provide basic amenities to all human beings and help in bringing up together.
