Discussion Board

Earn people's respect: Rishi Kapoor to Rahul Gandhi on 'dynasty' remarks


Total 235 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
ravi mohota
Re: Definitely'Rahul' is The LastNail in CongressCoffins. He is
by ravi mohota on Sep 13, 2017 07:37 PM
Definitely"Rahul" is The LastNail in CongressCoffins. He is Still So Innocent And Never Said Nothing on 2G,Coal, Common Wealth Games Scam and Jiji G Scam. He Is Really UnDeveloped Kid Yet.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
GSARORA
Rahul Gandhi
by GSARORA on Sep 13, 2017 06:46 PM  | Hide replies

I think Rahul Gandhi travelled a lot visited in interior of rural areas, urban areas, met lot of people shared their feelings to consolidate party position and even he did not marry but he puts himself in controversy though he uttered correct statement.

It is an accepted fact that every politician right from the grass root indulged in 'dynasty rules' see past records whether it is in Odisha, Bihar, U.P., Chattisgarh, Punjab, HP, TN, Andhra, Maharashtra, Haryana etc. So what is wrong what he said.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
P S SHAH
Re: Rahul Gandhi
by P S SHAH on Sep 13, 2017 07:04 PM
What he said was partially correct. He should have said that his party Congress ruled by dynasty. But can he say that our country is run by dynasty ? Are the current PM, President, Vice President, council of ministers, heads of judiciary, courts, IRS, IAS, IPS officials etc represent dynasty ? Only inexperienced and immature person like him only can give such statements .

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ravi mohota
Re: Rahul Gandhi
by ravi mohota on Sep 13, 2017 07:37 PM
Definitely"Rahul" is The LastNail in CongressCoffins. He is Still So Innocent And Never Said Nothing on 2G,Coal, Common Wealth Games Scam and Jiji G Scam. He Is Really UnDeveloped Kid Yet.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Parthasarathy Krishna
Re: Re: Rahul Gandhi
by Parthasarathy Krishna on Sep 14, 2017 09:54 AM
Congress is exposed to public. Bofors, national herald on Sonia n Rahul, 2,3,4G on Marans n Kani mozhi and chidu ,Veera badra Singh his own , Coal G, CWG exposure , its scams and corruption which is due to dynast? Lot more!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Rahul Gandhi
by Against Pseudos on Sep 14, 2017 08:02 PM
ARORA:
Every politician is dynastic? You need to visit Agra. :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
mahesh shrivastava
Rahul Gandhi
by mahesh shrivastava on Sep 13, 2017 06:06 PM  | Hide replies

Well said Rishi ji. You are bold enough to take on these issues very firmly.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Satyajeet Singh Yadava
Re: Rahul Gandhi
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Sep 13, 2017 06:08 PM
Chamchaa & Bhakt thr gr8 hain RishiPaaji!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Vijay Sahani
@logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 05:29 PM  | Hide replies

I don't know Rahul so I can't tell you the good or bad qualities of Rahul. But i'm sure he has some good qualities. He may not be fit for PM's because that may not be his calling unlike Modi who is 24X7 politician.

I would say the probability of Rahul Gandhi being a good person is almost 99% simply because he is a bad politician, as far as i'm concerned.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: @logical indian
by Against Pseudos on Sep 13, 2017 05:32 PM
No one knows any good qualities in the RaHool. Well said. :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Re: @logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 05:35 PM
But many know the bad qualities of Modi (the PM of India) :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Singh Yadava
Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Sep 13, 2017 05:39 PM
But his good Qualities which Rahul can learn-Throwing Excellent Jumlaas at the appropriate time & shedding Tears, Croco or otherwise to arouse c--passion!!!It may help rahul????

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Against Pseudos on Sep 13, 2017 05:43 PM
YadVaa:
The best in that art was Mahatma Gandhi. :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Singh Yadava
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Sep 13, 2017 05:45 PM
Of course why the present dispensation has usurped him!!!If they have courage-Erase the name of Mahatma Gandhi,at laest from the Re. notes!!!!Haaath me aaaaaaa jayegiiiiiiiiiiii life?????

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Against Pseudos on Sep 13, 2017 05:47 PM
YadVaa:
ROTFLMAO... You too remember him only because of money? Excellent. :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 05:47 PM
People who adore Modi can never understand the greatness of Mahatma Gandhi!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Against Pseudos on Sep 13, 2017 05:48 PM
Sahani:
ROTFLMAO...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Vijay Sahani
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 06:06 PM
Stop rolling so much. An @@ss_rolling so much on the ground does not look nice. :-)

Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Against Pseudos on Sep 14, 2017 05:18 AM
Sahani:
As if I care what you like. :-)

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Satyajeet Singh Yadava
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Sep 13, 2017 05:55 PM
Mukh me raaaam bagal me chooori???

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
P S SHAH
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by P S SHAH on Sep 13, 2017 06:27 PM
The people who love inexperienced and immature Rahul Gandhi will not like others.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by P S SHAH on Sep 13, 2017 06:25 PM
Satyajeet, what congress did for six decades ? Did they not fool the people ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
kartavya
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by kartavya on Sep 13, 2017 08:59 PM
Mr. Shah, the freedom with which you roll over here is because of congress, otherwise your communal government would have shut your mouth 7 generations before you. please accept the fact that the institutions that you see around you here are not created by the present government or their founders. in fact they were not even in the freedom struggle. all of a sudden these politicians have a profound feeling of nationalism which is a nothing short of a joke

   Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 09:14 PM
Kartavya,
Yes in freedom struggle this govt was not there neither was Rahul or Sonya so what you are speaking is totally irrelevant to the matter

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by P S SHAH on Sep 13, 2017 10:18 PM
Was there any contribution from Communists in freedom struggle ?

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
P S SHAH
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by P S SHAH on Sep 13, 2017 10:17 PM
Marta ya, This government and PM know what is his kartavya and will definitely will bring positive change for the people. Did you find any financial scams during three years as compared to series of scams under UPA ? Compare the progress of Japan after bombing by US on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Where are we as compared to them ? You didn't mind abolish of all rights for 18 months during emergency imposed by Congress in 1975 They only gave popular slogan nearly 40 years back " Garibi Hatao " Congressmen become prosperous while poor remain more poor. Your government couldn't even provide electricity to thousands of villages and kept them in dark since the day of Independence. Don't write rubbish about so called achievement of six decades and better have patience and give reasonable time to this government whose PM has absolutely no self interest in whatever he do. Don't be bias and colour blind and judge their performance closely before comparing them with that of Congress, the party you blindly support.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Against Pseudos on Sep 14, 2017 05:18 AM
Kartavya:
Because of Kaangress. Nice joke. :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Against Pseudos on Sep 13, 2017 05:41 PM
Sahani:
True. Your Sonya Bhakti makes you really capable of writing nice messages. :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 05:45 PM
Well, I always like reading your messages. It reduces my stress and always puts a smile on my face. Nice comedian, you are. :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Against Pseudos on Sep 13, 2017 05:52 PM
ã²í¸ããããããã ãããã&a tilde;ãí¨ã ãããããããã¹ã¹ ãããã¹ã´ããããããããì °¨ããã

Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyajeet Singh Yadava
Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Satyajeet Singh Yadava on Sep 13, 2017 05:47 PM
GIVE me emplyment I will write nice messahges for Parivaar too!!But they have taken by "Demon"!!!!!!!!

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Against Pseudos on Sep 13, 2017 05:52 PM
ROTFLMAO

Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by P S SHAH on Sep 13, 2017 06:30 PM
Satyajeet, better ask some other person to read your messages and ask for their comment instead of self boasting like some self claimed intelligent people who are under wrong impression tgat they have very high IQ than others.

Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 05:58 PM
A bad politician is a good person? Then all robbers, rapists are good at politics or bad person? That is not at all logic Vijay

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Re: @logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 06:01 PM
A good person will be a bad politician, at least in 99% of the case imo. That is logical.

Also, people who twist statements deliberately for ulterior reasons are good politicians imo.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:12 PM
Real definition is not that Vijay..anyway if you want to keep your own definition it is fine...but then that way we also have our own definituin through which Rahul does not qualify..sounds fine?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:00 PM
Just because he does not have the brain to be in politics and think he does not become a good person in anyway. If I really take your point my question would be then why is he trying on something which he does not.know?-;)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Re: @logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 06:03 PM
Brains and politics? Well, maybe not illogical. But at least, rare.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:06 PM
So Vijay at any cost either he is one wrong area in which case I do not want to see him in political field or he does not have the brain in him as per me. Both ways he is OUT right?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 06:10 PM
He is a decent person and SHOULD be in politics.

He is a bad politician and SHOULD be out of politics.

To be in politics he must shed his goodness and become a good politician. That's my view.

And THAT is logical.

:-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:13 PM
logical is not anyone's view which you do not understamd which means you do not understand the meaning of logic -:)

Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:14 PM
Anyway I was talking of Rahul , that either way if he has no brains (as i said) or as you said he is not a good politician which is essentially the same but due to two different reasons he should stay out right>

Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:15 PM
Anyway I was talking of Rahul , that either way if he has no brains (as i said) or as you said he is not a good politician which is essentially the same but due to two different reasons he should stay out right>

Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:15 PM
Anyway I was talking of Rahul , that either way if he has no brains (as i said) or as you said he is not a good politician which is essentially the same but due to two different reasons he should stay out right>

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 06:38 PM
If good politicians should be in politics

and decent / good people are bad politicians

then decent people should become good politicians by sheding their goodness to enter politics


   Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:39 PM
No..again assumptions that decent people are bad politicians..of course if loop is there so you yourself know it might not be true...-:) What is teh else part of it because execution will always go there -:)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:40 PM
No..again assumptions that decent people are bad politicians..of course if loop is there so you yourself know it might not be true...-:) What is teh else part of it because execution will always go there -:)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 06:41 PM
All logic is based on assumptions. It's the deductions your draw from your assumptions that should be logical, Mr. Logical Indian.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:47 PM
Not right..no logic is made on assumptions..you start with assumption, then prove it and then say some thing is right..you started with assumptions, did not prove anything and stayed in assumptions and that is not logical...

Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 06:50 PM
Read carefully. I said the deductions you draw FROM YOUR ASSUMPTIONS should be logical.

Assumptions can be right or wrong but the deductions should be logical.

I made two assumptions and inferences from them which were logical.

I don't think you have studied logic as a subject. I have.

Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 06:54 PM
Anyway,

I have a life outside office hours

and

my office hour ends at 6 PM

and it's 6:54 now

so I must start my life outside office hours.

Bye.

Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 07:17 PM
No. you are calling assumptions itself deduction that is the issue here..

Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 07:18 PM
You assumed that good people are bad politicians ...then deduced based on assumption and not proved that is the issue..in that way I can say if the earth is not round it is square...well assumption is wrong did not prove it but I dediced earth is square -:)

Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 07:19 PM
You always deduce from proofs and not from assumptions

Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:41 PM
By the way I am in software field so all these if loops are basics for us -:)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 06:40 PM
Abuse of whom Rahul, who cares?

I just love to abuse Modi! And I don't care who cares!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:42 PM
No I do not abuse at all..still they say abuse?Did i abuse here?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 06:47 PM
No you did not.

I always give the devil his due.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Against Pseudos on Sep 14, 2017 05:21 AM
Sahani:
I know that all Sonya Bhakts love to abuse Modi. Nothing new.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:15 PM
Anyway I was talking of Rahul , that either way if he has no brains (as i said) or as you said he is not a good politician which is essentially the same but due to two different reasons he should stay out right>

Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:17 PM
Vijay, is this in anyway abuse? because the moment I say something people in this forum says it is abuse...

Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @logical indian
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 06:36 PM
If decent people are bad politicians

and

bad politicians should be out of politics

then decent people should be out of politics.

Also,

If good politicians should be in politics

and decent people are bad politicians

then decent people should become good politicians by sheding their goodness to enter politics

That is logic.

I hope you have studied it to understand it.


Forward   |   Report abuse
logical indian
Re: @logical indian
by logical indian on Sep 13, 2017 06:21 PM
The issue is that we do not have any alternative right now..if somebody good person does not come to politics (well regardless of you theory -:)) Modi is going to remain which I am also not a big fan of because it becomes dictatorship..so Rahul in current form is a definite NO so either bring someone else or imprve Rahul either way is good...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Re: @logical indian
by P S SHAH on Sep 13, 2017 06:32 PM
Do you think is there any chance of improvement for him ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Parthasarathy Krishna
Re: @logical indian
by Parthasarathy Krishna on Sep 14, 2017 09:56 AM
Being idiotic and foolish are innocence?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vijay Sahani
@Guru Dutt Bahl
by Vijay Sahani on Sep 13, 2017 05:23 PM  | Hide replies

Movies need real people to watch movies.

Politics also need real people to vote for the candidates.

If you tell me that you can fool people easily in politics and hence dynasties in politics is not same as in movies (where you cannot fool people), I would say that not the fault of the dynast. It's the fault of the profession. Even a non-dynast can fool people easily.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: @Guru Dutt Bahl
by Against Pseudos on Sep 13, 2017 05:31 PM
ROTFLMAO

   Forward   |   Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Re: @Guru Dutt Bahl
by P S SHAH on Sep 13, 2017 06:20 PM
Against pseudo, some so called intelligent people with self claimed High IQ than others will stick to their nonsense and defend their nonsense with their logic. Their main intention is to hate Modi. Just imagine what would have been an image of the country goplobally if Rahul had become PM ? He could have easily made himself and the country a laughing stock before the world. Fortunately for this country and the people, such people and their party have lost power for a long long time. Even if they get power, such people will never have guts and courage to become PM as they always like to rule by back seat driving without any accountability or responsibility. Less said is better for the people who blindly support such inexperienced and immature person.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aam admi
Rahul loves dye-nasty
by aam admi on Sep 13, 2017 05:15 PM

but MMS failed him to deliver. Now he is requesting Trump to help him.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Janardhan
dynasty
by Janardhan on Sep 13, 2017 04:43 PM

Rahul pls define dynasty

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Janardhan
dynasty
by Janardhan on Sep 13, 2017 04:43 PM

Rahul pls define dynasty

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 235 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Write a message