"In an interview to a newspaper and in an effort to be well-meaning, the PM said it should not be as though there should be red tape for the common man but not for Mukesh Ambani."That is for advertisement.India always has one rule for the rich or the well connected and another Rule for the poor and never connected to power Source.In India all Live wires are those having their connections in place and those who not have their connection in place are fused wires(it is modifying a statement said by one personnel Manager as i was told)Salman Case has taken 20yrs.that is our Justice system.Supreme court order in Cauvery case is not addressed by Central Government.The house of those who had taken house-loan but couldn't repay those loans are auctioned.The industries of those who have taken Rs.55000 Cr. are never auctioned .It is likm one dead is a murder ;10000 dead is war,so acceptable.Rs.55000 cr. unrecovered loan is acceptable.It was given for wealth creators as that words came up some 40yrs back R.Ponnambalam
But when divisiveness or sectarianism proves beneficial electorally, it becomes a creed, or an ideology itself, as has happened with the BJP, which is taking to provincial politics without turning a hair.This has been always practiced by all indians.The had happened with Congress with it's vote-lordship (not one man one vote democracy) and is still i active practice , Amra bangala in Bengal,Nam Tamizhar party in Tamilnadu .Everyone wants to be the P.M. R.Ponnambalam
" minorities "Who are these minorities?There are seven Religions being Practiced in India .If it is religious minority the Zionist are the minority.If it is case minority it must be said which caste minority is mentioned here,R.Ponnambalam
{" I do not know if the common man exists anywhere except in R K Laxman's cartoons.There is no common man in India ."So all our Proletarian parliamentarians also were never questioning in the parliament the correctness of giving loan in the tune of Rs.55000 crores to some corporates and the income disparity going up despite the constitutional requirement of having to be a socialist country.The income disparity is as shown by the research report of Chancel and Piketty which said" The income share of India’s top 1% rose from approximately 6% in 1982 -1983 to above 10% a decade later and then to 15% in 2000 and further still around by 23% by 2014.R.Ponnambalam
do i expect good analysis from rediff on Modi? Never. But i want to say one thing, rediff cannot influence anyone, people in the country know who is what
Re: rediff
by R ponnabalam on Apr 14, 2018 10:00 AM
Rediff does't display who started this polarization and doesn't display who said what.Sir Syed khan in Meerut in 1888,Md,Ali Jinna in Lahore on 2nd March 1942 Dojanwe ,all had spoken good English.Alas! Rediff doesn't display that if copied and pasted to authenticate the stance.Our Govts' had hidden these from our knowledge.Now internet sites tell that.But Rediff doesn't recognize internet R.Ponnambalam
