No Way : Mr. Bhansali Your Film Is Now "Banned" In Most of The States in India. You Are Exposed to Use of D Company Money for Film Making. Now You See the "Leela" of Hindus Without Violance.
Re: No Way : Mr. Bhansali Your Film Is Now 'Banned' In Most of
by ravi mohota on Nov 23, 2017 02:25 PM
No Way : Mr. Bhansali Your Film Is Now "Banned" In Most of The States in India. You Are Exposed to Use of D Company Money for Film Making. Now You See the "Leela" of Hindus Without Violance.
No Way : Mr. Bhansali Your Film Is Now "Banned" In Most of The States in India. You Are Exposed to Use of D Company Money for Film Making. You are See Now "Leela" of Hindus Without Violance.
Re: No Way : Mr. Bhansali Your Film Is Now 'Banned' In Most of
by ravi mohota on Nov 23, 2017 02:21 PM
No Way : Mr. Bhansali Your Film Is Now "Banned" In Most of The States in India. You Are Exposed to Use of D Company Money for Film Making. You are See Now "Leela" of Hindus Without Violance.
Firstly, everybody especially Mr. BHANSAALI must understand that the Khiljis and the Mughals entirely belongs to different periods.
The Khiljis are the successors of the SLAVE DYNASTY; who established the Muslim rule in India.
Later Babur defeated & KILLED IBRAHIM LODHI in the battle field of Panipet(1206) and chasing his brother killed him too and established the Mughal rule in India. Allauddin Khiljis was a one-sided interest for a married Queen.
Not only Mr. Bhansaali, all those who support him blindly in the name FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND SPEECH must understand this; especially the vigilantees of freedom of expression and speech.
without knowing the true facts they should not invite the wrath of public by blindly supporting Mr. Bhansaali.
Now they must also understand and realse that the matter is nomore under Mr.Bhansaali and it has been transferred to the producers who are proceeding with the matter according to the instructions of their foreign bosses.
Re: the padmavathi factor
by Homi Irani on Nov 23, 2017 04:46 PM
This movie is not about the Mughals. Its about Rani Padmavati and her valour. Hope you have aleast heard this childhood story. We all grew about hearing this hystotical story and we are dying to see it in big screen. Why talk about something when you have not seen anything.
I saw the Rajat Sharma (Editor In chief India Today) say there is nothing against the Rajputs and nothing favours Khilji in the moview. He felt proud about the Rajsthani history watching the movie then why crib till we see it.
Kudos to Bhansali to have shown the wittynes, valour and beauty of the Rajputs
He and his actors should be canned in public view if found guilty of Misrepresenting the Hindu History. They are making mockery of democracy in name of freedom of expression.
Re: Bhansali should be given wrap on his knuckles
by Homi Irani on Nov 23, 2017 04:48 PM
Whats is history? Read it .And hey why do u says its not corrrectly depicted, when you have not see the movie.
Well, logically no film should be banned if considering the creative liberties and licenses of the filmmaker, even if it is hurting the sentiments of anybody because a movie is just to be watched in theatres for 3 hours and forgotton. However, there cannot be two rules for anything. If all those supporting release of Padmavati, where were they when similarly other films, advertisements and so many other things were banned in the past. Why had the filmmakers not protested fiercely at that time and forced the Govt. to release those movies. Can't say that only Bhansali is a creative and intelligent director. All the others too were. Anyway, if Padmawati has to release then there should be a law going forward that no films will ever be banned and released irrespective of anybody protesting. Can such a rule be possible in India. No never, so there is no question of pointing what is right or wrong. Based on the volume of pressures of the people or community, movies will be released and such protests against any creative liberty or any progressive thought in the name of educated and intelligence will always be protested. This is India and even if some percentage of people may say that India is no America, every Indian's sentiments have to be respected. And since exploitation is the key Indian character and system based on the power and clout, we will have to live with it.
Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by Vijay Sahani on Nov 23, 2017 11:15 AM
Please think of the consequences of what you are propounding.
You are saying to_h@ll_with law. Might is right in India.
Of course, this freedom should be available to every creative person including Rushdie and Tasleema Nasreen. That is the only right thing. Not justification of might is right.
Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by P S SHAH on Nov 23, 2017 02:26 PM
Bangladeshi author and physician Tasleema Nasreen is living in exile from 1994. She took refuge in Europe, USA and took citizenship of Sweden. She is staying India from 2005 on residential permit. The Indian government has refused to grant her citizenship .She has shown her desire to fight for her freedom from Indian soil. She is known for creating controversies and always like to express her opinion on every affairs of the country. She should very well remember that she is living on refuge in this country and she should be grateful to this country. She must behave like a good guest and should avoid creating controversies here and should avoid giving comment on the issue relating to this country while she stay here. If she is so adamant of expressing her opinion on all the matter , she may do so from anywhere outside this country.
Re: Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by Vijay Sahani on Nov 23, 2017 02:41 PM
So now you have problem with the views of Taslima Nasreen. I thought only bigoted mullahs had a problem. I guess people want to hear only what they like. All others can go to ... Pakistan!
Re: Re: Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by P S SHAH on Nov 23, 2017 03:01 PM
Ch...a No.1, use your brain if you have. She is not Indian citizen and has absolutely no right to comment on the affair of this country where she is staying on refuge.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by Vijay Sahani on Nov 23, 2017 03:12 PM
Indian constitution does not have separate rights for non citizens.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by P S SHAH on Nov 23, 2017 04:24 PM
Why she did not had guts to say anything when she took refuge in Europe, USA and Sweden ? Why she prefer to stay in India and seek citizenship of this country inspite of having citizenship of Sweden? such people like to take refuge in this country and also like to give comment against the country which give them refuge. No wonder, Indian government both past and the present has decided to refuse giving Indian citizenship to her knowing her behaviour and attitude.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by P S SHAH on Nov 23, 2017 04:26 PM
Ch...a No1, you better continue your regular dose of Chyawanprash
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by P S SHAH on Nov 23, 2017 04:29 PM
Idiot like you always think that you are most intelligent person but very high IQs but expose your lack of understanding . Ch...a like you always want to show that your thinking is always different than others.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by Vijay Sahani on Nov 23, 2017 04:29 PM
You can keep asking stup!d" questions. Actually you need ment@l treatment urgently.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by P S SHAH on Nov 23, 2017 04:51 PM
Abe Idiot, I am not a failed businessman like you that i will have do do whatever you do to please some one.
Re: Re: Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by P S SHAH on Nov 23, 2017 04:54 PM
Abe Ch..ye and idiot, continue your useless comments and show how intelligent you are which you always boast about yourself. and inspite of your so called intelligence and high IQ, you have totally failed in your business but always like to advice others. Do you think any one will take any advice from an idiot like you ?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by Vijay Sahani on Nov 23, 2017 04:56 PM
A person with an IQ thinks he is an ace investigator! All I can say, good for you , and good for me!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by Vijay Sahani on Nov 23, 2017 04:57 PM
A person with an IQ of 60 thinks he is an ace investigator! All I can say, good for you , and good for me!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by P S SHAH on Nov 23, 2017 07:05 PM
You useless idiot go on counting IQ of others instead of your own to pass your all idle time.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by Vijay Sahani on Nov 23, 2017 08:27 PM
you dumb@ss. keep abusing others and keep sucking up to Modi.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: There can be no two rule for anything
by P S SHAH on Nov 23, 2017 10:09 PM
Oye idiot, every one know whom and what you like to suck. Continue your activity as usual.
This is just intellectual bullsh!t. The writer is trying to cover up the right wing agenda by confusing the readers with side issues such as fatwas, casting of popular hero Ranveer, books written on Aurengzeb, misguided attempt to refurbish the persona of Khilji! What rubbish!
There is only one issue here! Will we have rule of law in India or no? The answer seems to be : No!
Re: Bullsh!t
by Vijay Sahani on Nov 23, 2017 11:11 AM
Rajasthan CM's advice to get clearance from self appointed protector of Rajput pride is nothing short of abominable and irresponsible behaviour from a head of a state.
Dear fellow countrymen, The only objective of this post is to highlight the biggest gaffe committed by the producers and director of the film Padmavati in the cast itself. It is an Indian psyche that we associate the reel life characters to their real life and expect the same kind of nobility and purity from them. That's the reason a Prithviraj kapur cast as Akbar on stage may not bow down to the Indian prime minister as he considers himself at that point of time a bigger entity than PM himself and the PM too sportingly has to accept the fact. By the same logic the PM prays to Ram Laxman during the annual Ram leela event although the actors themselves are lesser beings. Sanjay Leela had committed the same mistake in showing a Rajputani in a love relationship with a pastoral class in his movie Ram-Leela, however was forgiven although both the castes were offended as it is fact of history that no marital relationships exists and the men women of either caste share the most relationship of brother and sister with end number of instances where the honour of each is protected by the other at life cost. Hence Sanjay has the habit of doing this things and later claiming innocence as he did by previewing the movie before select media persons to get it certified even before the censor board did so. For the Rajputs, the queen is nothing less than a deity, however are in a minority compared to the remaining fellow citizens but do the majority have a right to hurt the sentiments..
Re: The fake cast
by Vijay Sahani on Nov 23, 2017 11:05 AM
Yes. It's not just the majority who has a right to hurt the sentiments of the minority. Even a minority of one has a right to hurt the sentiments of the majority. That's the law of the land.
Sentiments have no place in law. If your sentiments are hurt you can go to the courts to get redressal. You cannot take the law in your own hands.
Re: Re: The fake cast
by AJAY SARVAIYA on Nov 23, 2017 11:14 AM
In continuation...of a minority and if yes, then the ideals cherished in the constitution of this republic are threatened. Jauhar, the ultimate self-sacrifice to protect ones honour by the queen and thousands of such Rajputanis who self-immolated themselves rather than falling prey to the brute invader revealed human spirit at its zenith which also astonished the winner and making him feel like a loser. The barbarians had to modify their view of Hindu society which protected them from further forceful conversions. Sanjay Leela started on the wrong foot by playing with this noble sentiments by the cast itself with Deepika playing the noble character with her boyfriend with whom as everyone knows is having a live in relationship and who plays Khilji, so even if the movie does not carry any scene together as certified by the select media persons who previewed this movie, the relationship of the cast itself is an anathema and a mischief played knowingly or unknowingly to play with the sentiments and this issue has been entirely missed out by all concerned and could have been averted at the beginning itself.
Re: Re: Re: The fake cast
by Homi Irani on Nov 23, 2017 04:53 PM
If it concerns that Ranveer in real life is Deepikas beau, and in the movie he is shown as a villian, guys you all need to grow up, Ranveer selected this role, because he wanted to do something challenging, and it appears that he has played his role in the way Khilji needs to be seen, ugly, ferocious, demon. Ranveer is an actor and so is Deepika. They play their roles in the movie, talk if any thing wrong is shown to hurt caste/creed sentiments or so called history modified
Re: Re: The fake cast
by AJAY SARVAIYA on Nov 23, 2017 11:19 AM
In continuation...of a minority and if yes, then the ideals cherished in the constitution of this republic are threatened. Jauhar, the ultimate self-sacrifice to protect ones honour by the queen and thousands of such Rajputanis who self-immolated themselves rather than falling prey to the brute invader revealed human spirit at its zenith which also astonished the winner and making him feel like a loser. The barbarians had to modify their view of Hindu society which protected them from further forceful conversions. Sanjay Leela started on the wrong foot by playing with this noble sentiments by the cast itself with Deepika playing the noble character with her boyfriend with whom as everyone knows is having a live in relationship and who plays Khilji, so even if the movie does not carry any scene together as certified by the select media persons who previewed this movie, the relationship of the cast itself is an anathema and a mischief played knowingly or unknowingly to play with the sentiments and this issue has been entirely missed out by all concerned and could have been averted at the beginning itself.
Re: Re: The fake cast
by AJAY SARVAIYA on Nov 23, 2017 11:21 AM
In continuation...of a minority and if yes, then the ideals cherished in the constitution of this republic are threatened. Jauhar, the ultimate self-sacrifice to protect ones honour by the queen and thousands of such Rajputanis who self-immolated themselves rather than falling prey to the brute invader revealed human spirit at its zenith which also astonished the winner and making him feel like a loser. The barbarians had to modify their view of Hindu society which protected them from further forceful conversions. Sanjay Leela started on the wrong foot by playing with this noble sentiments by the cast itself with Deepika playing the noble character with her boyfriend with whom as everyone knows is having a live in relationship and who plays Khilji, so even if the movie does not carry any scene together as certified by the select media persons who previewed this movie, the relationship of the cast itself is an anathema and a mischief played knowingly or unknowingly to play with the sentiments and this issue has been entirely missed out by all concerned and could have been averted at the beginning itself.
Re: Re: The fake cast
by AJAY SARVAIYA on Nov 23, 2017 11:26 AM
In continuation...of a minority and if yes, then the ideals cherished in the constitution of this republic are threatened. Jauhar, the ultimate self-sacrifice to protect ones honour by the queen and thousands of such Rajputanis who self-immolated themselves rather than falling prey to the brute invader revealed human spirit at its zenith which also astonished the winner and making him feel like a loser. The barbarians had to modify their view of Hindu society which protected them from further forceful conversions. Sanjay Leela started on the wrong foot by playing with this noble sentiments by the cast itself with Deepika playing the noble character with her boyfriend with whom as everyone knows is having a live in relationship and who plays Khilji, so even if the movie does not carry any scene together as certified by the select media persons who previewed this movie, the relationship of the cast itself is an anathema and a mischief played knowingly or unknowingly to play with the sentiments and this issue has been entirely missed out by all concerned and could have been averted at the beginning itself.
Re: Re: The fake cast
by gokula patra on Nov 23, 2017 11:48 AM
Mr Vijay sahani... One question to you... When muzie terrorists tried to take revenge of babri masjid demolition, was it not they taking the law into their hands ? That time none of the imams and sickulars from bollywood, media houses or even NY time which is a known leftist ideology supporter denounced it .. In fact there was fatwas raised by many mosques in india against Advani and co ... That time you and your muzie community were sleeping and now giving us lectures .. That is why every one around the world hate you and your type ..
Re: Re: Re: The fake cast
by P S SHAH on Nov 23, 2017 04:33 PM
Mr Gokula Patra, this man always think that he is super intelligent with very high IQ than others but in reality is biggest idiot.
Re: Re: Re: The fake cast
by Vijay Sahani on Nov 23, 2017 12:01 PM
You have a right to hate me.
But "people like me" do not have double standards unlike "people like you".
Demolition of Babri Masjid was wrong as was the violence that followed it. Killing of Kar sevaks in Godhra was wrong as was the violence that followed it. Period.
But more revolting that violence by any side is that governments winking at violence by their "preferred side" and I include both BJP and Congress when I say that.
I do not justify the wrongs of one by talking about the wrongs of the other. In either case the beneficiary is the political party who wants power, not you or me common man.
Re: Re: Re: Re: The fake cast
by Vijay Sahani on Nov 23, 2017 12:05 PM
You have a right to hate me. That doe not bothers me. What bothers me is when you start making violent threats. THAT is against the law and that is where the government / law should step in, which this government is deliberately not doing for it's own vested interest.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The fake cast
by Vijay Sahani on Nov 23, 2017 02:01 PM
One piece of advice to you too. Don't presume and jump to conclusion.
There are some in the world who go by what they think is right and not by whether "they are right because they are in the majority". I have a conscious. You have to ask whether you have one.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The fake cast
by gokula patra on Nov 23, 2017 12:27 PM
One piece of advice.. Don't play victim card always.. Good senses in minorities activate only when they have to go full throttle against hindus .. Till such time their silence to fatwas and other mis deeds of minorities connotes only their silent acceptance.. So please introspect to the mis deeds of your peaceful community before pointing finger at others..In no other country majority will tolerate their humiliation like hindus are doing in India.. So stay in peace..
