NOT ALL...tajmahal like buildings are disgraceful structures ..forced constructions built without peoples will and love...if they are built for culture they would not have destroyed thousands and thousands of temples like somnath...
NOT ALL...tajmahal like buildings are disgraceful structures ..forced constructions built without peoples will and love...if they are built for culture they would not have destroyed thousands and thousands of temples like somnath...
These are monuments for culture LOSS of NATIVE TONGUES OF NORTH INDIA to FARZI LINEAGE LANGUAGES, CULTURE LOSS OF faith of practice toSAUDI ARABIAN culture codes that in 1947 India was the country in the world with the biggest population of India's NON NATIVE but Saudi Arabian culture code faith practicing people.R.Ponnambalam
People say Taj was bult by shahjahan in memory of his wife mumtaz. After her death he married her younger sister. What type of love it was. He produced so many childeren out of her wedlock. Still people call,it love. He got cut down the hands of every mason worked on this so,called monument, why. Histirian must answer few questions about it. You may say past is past.let us firget it. Can you forget making if pakistan, and killing if mire tham millions of poor people. More than one crore were displaced. What is the situation at the moment. See what is happening in AMU. Let us learn lessons from history and take corrective actions in our thinking
Re: Taj mahal is not a monument but a symbol of slavery of Hindu,
by R ponnabalam on May 12, 2018 03:56 PM
If Invader Mughal culture of barbarity and the avid claimant of WE ARE A SEPARATE NATION can be or should be taken as Indian culture why not take the British colonial culture as Indian culture.It is ONE WORLDR.PONNAMBALAM
Re: Taj mahal is not a monument but a symbol of slavery of Hindu,
by R ponnabalam on May 12, 2018 03:57 PM
If Invader Mughal culture of barbarity and the avid claimant of WE ARE A SEPARATE NATION can be or should be taken as Indian culture why not take the British colonial culture as Indian culture.It is ONE WORLD R.PONNAMBALAM
Re: Taj mahal is not a monument but a symbol of slavery of Hindu,
by R ponnabalam on May 14, 2018 11:47 AM
He got cut down the hands of every mason worked on this so,called monument." So to admirers it is a monument of Love and to those ordinary observers it is a Reminder ,call it monument of the barbarity of cutting the hands of artisans who made it Historian must answer few questions about it.Hi strorians!Let us forget them,R,POnnambalam
BRITISH RULE WAS THE GOLDEN ERA IN THE INDIAN HISTORY!
1. British, ending barbaric & dominating rule of Mozlems (who killed 600 mil & raped 600 mil HHIndus over 1200 yrs), liberated HHindus from 1200-yr subjugation & gave them religious freedom and prevented India from becoming BarbaricIslamicRepublicOfIndia (BIRI). 2. British united 550 princely states, which were fighting internecine wars, into a single entity. British ended the menace 1000s of murderous robbers (thugs) in north India. 3. British built excellent dams, bridges, railways, gave equitable Justice system, modern education system by opening universities, etc which rapidly improved the living and intellectual standards of common people. British modern medical services reduced death rate and increased life-span. 4. English language helped India to become a tech & educational power in the world today, in spite of some shortcomings. 5. British rule considerably weakened the barbaric caste-system, superstitions, ignorance, etc strongly rooted in Indian psyche, though remnants remain. 6. No doubt Hinduism is the most secular, literature-rich religion, but Indians live in delusion—believing ancient Indian literature has all sci & tech; in 2000 BC, literacy was 90%, all were rich; Indian economy 27% of world economy in 1700, etc. These are all lies invented by scoundrels to fool Indians. Before the British, Indians were living in poor & pathetic conditions. INDIANS SHOULD DEVELOP PRAGMATI
Re: BRITISH RULE WAS THE GOLDEN ERA IN THE INDIAN HISTORY!
by raj on May 14, 2018 09:25 AM
they did lot of good things... but they also looted and ripped our countries natural resources and wealth disproportionately..
Many monuments are part of INdian history. Yes. But they are not part of ancient Indian culture. Many monuments are built by force, using free indian labor, after demolishing symbols of ancient civilisation, by alien barbaric rulers. Hence they can not be called as part of Indian culture, but are part of Indian history. Ancient imposed culture by forced conversion can not be part of Indian culture.
Re: Many monuments are NOT indian culture..
by R ponnabalam on May 11, 2018 01:55 PM
YES!Many monuments are part of Indian History.As a U.P.S.C.examination question 1964 or 65 went,"The history of India is the history of Invasions on India-Discuss.'.The history of India is the history of invasions and when we discuss as asked in that question it is the history of defeats, subjugation and humiliation of India and so are these monuments.India has never won a war in it's history .If we forget history ,do not draw appropriate and correct lesson we would suffer the repeat of the history we had undergone.R.Ponnambalam
Re: Re: Many monuments are NOT indian culture..
by R ponnabalam on May 11, 2018 05:18 PM
Without the needed or requisite Power to rule if the colonists have to go away, the invader previous to that colonist should also should have to go away hinges in that statement from the horse's mouth R.Ponnambalam
Re: Re: Many monuments are NOT indian culture..
by R ponnabalam on May 11, 2018 05:19 PM
Without the needed or requisite Power to rule if the colonists have to go away, the invader previous to that colonist should also should have to go away hinges in that statement from the horse's mouth R.Ponnambalam
