Discussion Board

'Netaji was the reason why the British left India'


Total 137 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
chetan Shetty
Sound good...brits ka fata hoga
by chetan Shetty on Jan 28, 2016 05:42 PM  | Hide replies

I don't think they just left due to our non violence...fata hoga...when bose and team too weapons in hand and standing against them...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Loknath
Re: Sound good...brits ka fata hoga
by Loknath on Jan 29, 2016 07:43 AM
Bose was completly crushed by british before 1045. The main reason of his death mystry is the wealth he was having and trying to flee to Russia.By the time he was killed Azad Hind Fouz was no more relavant.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Somenath Paul
Re: Re: Sound good...brits ka fata hoga
by Somenath Paul on Jan 30, 2016 08:41 PM
Mr. Loknath. Talk sense. I don't think you have read the interview properly. The INA was defeated; but the real impact of INA was during the INS trail; which resulted in the mutiny in the Navy and the Army. Even the British Premier Mr. Clement Atlee acknowledged that. Nobody expects a Cong chamchaa to ever acknowledge/accept it,

   Forward   |   Report abuse
narayan
Superb reporting
by narayan on Jan 28, 2016 04:07 PM  | Hide replies

1. So you don't think Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru got us freedom from the British, that the INA got us freedom.
2. What has the country achieved since the secret files on Netaji were declassified?

Such questions only reflect on the immaturity of the reporter from Rediff. Trying to put words in the mouth of the interviewed person.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Useless Comments
Re: Superb reporting
by Useless Comments on Jan 28, 2016 09:51 PM
atleast our PM is doing one thing.. he i trying to fool people again with all these dirty politics.... you should be grate full to him .... he is doing something

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aam admi
Gandhiji believed in British rule till 1920
by aam admi on Jan 28, 2016 11:19 AM  | Hide replies

Gandhiji believed that Britishers are the best bet for India till 1920, in 1917-18 , Gandhiji even went to address public at various places and pleaded to join British Army and fight for British.
Irrespective of all social positive qualities Gandhi possessed he had a soft corner for Britshers' rule though in his later part of live he initiated many movements against British Rule but he advocated strict non-violence.
He had a disliking for violence propagated by revolutionary, he never appreciated them. Though he remained in touch with British rulers in spite of their brutal acts but he never had in touch with revolutionaries nor he likes to meet them.
he had a soft corner for Nehru but could not appreciate Bose.
'My Experiments with Truth' , the autobiography of gandhi reveals his qualities and believe in British Ruler.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Loknath
Re: Gandhiji believed in British rule till 1920
by Loknath on Jan 29, 2016 07:40 AM
India was never a single country before british. British wre fa btter than any monarch rulling pats of India before them.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Malay Barua
It is a fact.
by Malay Barua on Jan 28, 2016 10:01 AM

Even shifting of capital from Calcutta to Delhi is one of the reason that Bengal was infested with the freedom fighters. Khudiram, Bagha Jatin, Surya Sen, Binoy, Badal, Dinesh, Pretilata, Annata Singha, Lokonath Bal, Arabinda Ghosh and so many people were very active under the organization like Anushilan Samiti, Jughantar and Bengal Revolutionary Force.
The Britisher were continuously been attacked by these Revolutionary Forces. Chittagong was freed for two day by Surya Sen. Bengal was not safe for the any administrative people British or Indian.
But it is also true that political process was also necessary and Congress, Mahatma Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, Azad played that role.
It is also true that after independence Nehru or Congress had tried to minimize the role of revolutionaries and had maximized Congress and its leader's role.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sandip Dhara
'Netaji was the reason why the British left India'
by Sandip Dhara on Jan 28, 2016 09:52 AM  | Hide replies

So it is not a RSS planted story! Whenever the ruler is strong, the complain of intolerance pops up.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Malay Barua
Re: 'Netaji was the reason why the British left India'
by Malay Barua on Jan 28, 2016 10:05 AM
Yes, its is for their advantage, thewy even had tried to fit Malda(West Bengal) and Purnia(Bihar) in these intolerance fiasco.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Soumitra Goswami
Spoiling
by Soumitra Goswami on Jan 28, 2016 09:45 AM  | Hide replies

This grand nephew is really spoiling the name of Netaji. He now wants to encash on the sacrifice of Netaji. Netaji is above politics and revered by all irrespective of political idealism. He should not join any party on fighting for knowing his secrets.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
krishna gurumurthi
Re: Spoiling
by krishna gurumurthi on Jan 28, 2016 06:55 PM
The reverence we had for Netaji Bose as Boy Scouts was very great.This kind of fighting by some people is creationg distasteful feeling Keeping Netaji image benefits many people.what is important for these people is the BENEFIT,not Netaji. Attempting to even look alike.Pathetic?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
paul theo
Re: Spoiling
by paul theo on Jan 28, 2016 09:53 AM
THIS IS ALL CHEAP POLITICS BEING PLAYED BY THE BJP AND THE RSS .NOW THAT THEY ARE LOOSING ALL PANCHAYAT ELECTIONS, NOTHING CAN SAVE THEM NOW, SHAH WILL BRING ABOUT THEIR DOWNFALL, WHICH IS GOOD FOR THE COUNTRY.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
krishna gurumurthi
Re: Re: Spoiling
by krishna gurumurthi on Jan 28, 2016 06:56 PM
ABSOLUTELY

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Malay Barua
Re: Re: Spoiling
by Malay Barua on Jan 28, 2016 10:13 AM
Why you do not start rich politics.
It is a fasion for some chutzpah nationalists (barrowed from Shehzad Poonawalla)to defame BJP & RSS.
For them Assaduddin, Azam Khan and likes of are better.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Malay Barua
Re: Spoiling
by Malay Barua on Jan 28, 2016 10:08 AM
So be it. Congress also had warned Netaji to refraim from constitute a new party call Forwad Block.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ashok Anand
Netaji was the reason why british left India
by Ashok Anand on Jan 28, 2016 09:10 AM  | Hide replies

It's fact that Britisher left India because of Netaji, Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev, Mangal Pande and other freedom fighters who gave theit lives for Mother India. I salute all of them. Citizens of India are realising that to have power the Congress divided the nation and the same policy is being followed by Sonia & Rahul. If Congress is a nationalist party, it should participate in discussions and not obstruct the functioning of parliament. If Congress does not mend its way people will teach them. Jain Hind.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
gopalakrishnan krishnan
Re: Netaji was the reason why british left India
by gopalakrishnan krishnan on Jan 28, 2016 07:10 PM
yes you are absolutely right- the contribution of Gandhi and Nehru in the freedom struggle is zero. half the time they were in prison enjoying good hospitality provided by the british government. it is only people to subhash and others who were fighting the britishers by escaping from the britishers.
The entire congress under Nehru consist of third rated persons

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Prakash Bedekar
Re: Re: Netaji was the reason why british left India
by Prakash Bedekar on Jan 28, 2016 10:48 PM
What was contribution of RSS in freedom struggle?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
paul theo
Re: Netaji was the reason why british left India
by paul theo on Jan 28, 2016 09:56 AM
CHEAP POLITICS BEING PLAYED BY SHAH AND CO. IT WILL BACK FIRE, NO DOUBT.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message awaiting moderator review. |  Show message
Malay Barua
Re: Re: Netaji was the reason why british left India
by Malay Barua on Jan 28, 2016 10:15 AM
Cheapest politics of chutzpah nationalism is better than Cheap politics.
Stop occurrence of Malda and Purnia first.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 137 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message