Re: MATERNAL UNCLE'S HOUSE PARTY
by ASHRAF NATHER on Dec 24, 2016 07:07 AM
if you cant read properly,u moron plz read once again. what he said, go n search the house n farm house of CS. not his office. just because u hve power u cant do anything.
Re: Re: MATERNAL UNCLE'S HOUSE PARTY
by Nakuleswaran Navaratnam on Dec 24, 2016 07:30 AM
the centre has the power but it did not do 'anything' as you said. It caught a thief you was your lieutenant who has brought shame on the state and its government and the act has stung you only because of the result -- not the act itself; that is why you are scowling.
Re: Re: MATERNAL UNCLE'S HOUSE PARTY
by Nakuleswaran Navaratnam on Dec 24, 2016 07:34 AM
'who happened to be your lieutenant' and you didn't care about all he was up to? --and you don't want your head to act promptly?
Re: MATERNAL UNCLE'S HOUSE PARTY
by Solomon Papayya on Dec 24, 2016 07:14 AM
you moron, office is for performing office duty, not a place to hide stolen money.
Re: Re: MATERNAL UNCLE'S HOUSE PARTY
by Navneet Bhatnagar on Dec 25, 2016 08:05 PM
Then Mr. Papayya , you are not familiar with the ways and processes of the government and its officers. The plans are worked out in the office itself , whether for public welfare or private good. Just recall , so many bureaucrats and their cronies were arrested from the very seats and cabins which they occupied in government buildings.
Chief secretary of the Tamil Nadu govt. looted 7000 crore under the nose of chief minister / other ministers and Tamil Nadu govt and they are ignorant? Now AIADMK leaders are upset that no information about the raids was provided to them so that he can help to hide the looted treasure.
Mr Dheeran should know that right under their nose such things are happening...either they are party to the frauds of the babus their contractors or they are allowing them to swindle peoples money.If that be the case which central agency will inform the politicians.
YES AIADMK RAISED GOOD VOICE AGAINST SUCH RAID AFTERALL WE HAVE LAW FOR EVERY ACTION BUT HERE IT SEEM BJP GOVT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF IT SO THAT THEY MIGHT USE SUCH AS A WEAPON IN NEXT UP ELECTION
Re: Re: HERE AIADMK IS RIGHT ON THE SUBJECT
by supravat pati on Dec 23, 2016 07:56 PM
Big connection bhaiji then you hear the voice of bjp bhakat how we raid the big boss to end the corruption and then ask for vote in the name above
Re: Re: Re: HERE AIADMK IS RIGHT ON THE SUBJECT
by Rakesh Pandit on Dec 23, 2016 09:05 PM
Supravat, eat one big dosai and take rest. Confused kids not allowed on this forum.
Re: Re: Re: HERE AIADMK IS RIGHT ON THE SUBJECT
by supravat pati on Dec 27, 2016 12:21 PM
okey before i take rest i ask you one simple question you bakara thet why IT and CBI not raid the house of RAMDEV baba and AMBANI and ADANI BABA listen Bakara Law is same for all but BJP GOVT just apply PIK and Choose method to search Raid okey
If the central agencies have to conduct raids , they should do it .Giving prior information, informing leaders, should not enter our Secretariat are all of no importance to the centre. The bonus is on the persons occupying the chair & positions not to misuse. if you misuse it , they need to be punished . The others tell them to shut up.
Whether it IT or CBI or any Vigilance when raid is made: At the time of raid, a letter of Authority with specifying the purpose issued by a Competent Authority of respective dept has to be given. Here in this case IT officials would have followed the prescribed the rules and regulations. Definitely before entering the house of Chief Secy they would have handed over this authority to him and also to the places where raids were made.
In TN Sectt similar letter would have been given to the competent officer concerned and proceded with. Had it not been given, TN govt would not have allowed IT people to scrutinize its files.
Further TN Govt not given any disgust report agst this raid officially. Only AIADMK official spokesperson expressed his party's displeasure over the raid. It is political.
Re: Re: Raid in TN Sectt.
by Gladyschellam on Dec 23, 2016 04:19 PM
Definitely the secretariat would not have allowed to scrutinize its files (related to particular case) without proper authenticity in writing by the competent authority from IT dept.
