Discussion Board

'Whoever works on Tipu Sultan movie is anti-Indian'


Total 462 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
rajakumar dasma
History is bogus
by rajakumar dasma on Sep 19, 2015 01:39 PM  | Hide replies

Name - Books - Realthing
Nehru - Chacha - in reality??????
Indira - Durga - in reality????
Tipu Sultan - Secular - Tyrant
Veera pandiya kattabomman - Fighter against British - In reality
If you mention any name and their personification in various books and in actual they were not fit for this sort of hype which traits they never had. It is equivalent to todays media hyping unnecessarily worthless guys/gals just because they want higher TRP by which they can be in business in a better way than their competitors. There is a tamil thirukkural which says "Whatever Words heard through anybodys mouth; Go for the actual meaning of what it was and not the literal word meaning". Finally it comes to that. Conveniently in the history books actual things are not written manytimes due to various reasons/pressure.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sandeep Singh
Re: History is bogus
by Sandeep Singh on Sep 20, 2015 12:33 PM
it will be more apt to say that History is distorted deliberately

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rajakumar dasma
History is bogus
by rajakumar dasma on Sep 19, 2015 01:38 PM

Name - Books - Realthing
Nehru - Chacha - in reality??????
Indira - Durga - in reality????
Tipu Sultan - Secular - Tyrant
Veera pandiya kattabomman - Fighter against British - In reality
If you mention any name and their personification in various books and in actual they were not fit for this sort of hype which traits they never had. It is equivalent to todays media hyping unnecessarily worthless guys/gals just because they want higher TRP by which they can be in business in a better way than their competitors. There is a tamil thirukkural which says "Whatever Words heard through anybodys mouth; Go for the actual meaning of what it was and not the literal word meaning". Finally it comes to that. Conveniently in the history books actual things are not written manytimes due to various reasons/pressure.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
SREENIVAS
tippu
by SREENIVAS on Sep 19, 2015 01:33 PM

this anti hindu rediff is blocking my statements

    Forward  |  Report abuse
AKPandey
History is not in books only
by AKPandey on Sep 19, 2015 01:12 PM  | Hide replies

Fact is showing his marks about the cruelty destroying the things. Fact is not covered in the History book many facts were hide by English, communist and congress Govt.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
babu raj
Re: History is not in books only
by babu raj on Sep 19, 2015 01:33 PM
Right

   Forward   |   Report abuse
AKPandey
History
by AKPandey on Sep 19, 2015 01:05 PM

Subhash Chandra Bose History controversies will prove the other history controversies.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
samuel GS
Tipu sultan
by samuel GS on Sep 18, 2015 12:00 AM

It is a useless subject. Useless fellows are making useless comments. Shameless fellows are writing new history shamelessly.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
piri
Both Aurangzeb
by piri on Sep 17, 2015 09:47 PM


and Chatrapati Shivaji were tyrants.

Both looted the people in their domains as though it was their right, both ruled as absolute monarchs (which by itself is barbarianism and which ought not to be remembered today as anything more than barbarianism of those times) and both made laws to suit their individual interests more than those of the commoners they ruled.

There was hardly any king or emperor in history - whether hyndu, muxlim, chrittin or any other - who deserves much of respect from todays generations. Each of them ought to be seen merely as the creation of the times they lived in. People of today owe nothing at all in any way to the so called kings and emperors of history.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 462 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message