On the land Bill consent clause, Mr Shah says it is impossible to get 100 % consent. Nowhere does the Bill of 2013 say 100% consent is required. He is deliberately overstating the issue.
He talks of ten years of horrible mismanagement ,but how come the average GDP growth was above 7 % for ten years ?This is just exaggeration to make the BJP look better than it really is.
On insurance FDI he says that BJP wanted to make sure the local companies were not harmed by MNCs entering. How is that situation solved by the new FDI Bill ? This sounds like an excuse for the U-turn.
However, he has honestly used the old GDP calculations when comparing 2014 with 2015, though he has made an error in the figures.
We must also appreciate that now the BJP and Shah have started listening to farmers after Rahul's and the Opposition campaigns and hopefully will go in for more consensus building in future.
Re: not
by hyderabadi on May 16, 2015 06:41 PM
arey beggar, as though you work as chaprasi...i know must of us work for MNC if you are so against MNC's and industries , then why dont you resign and start begging
Do not agree, without land industry cannot come, whereas agriculture can be done after making barren land cultivable. Do not come psychological factor of congress rather make them naked for the hate propaganda they have been spreading all over the country.
Put a section in you Lang Grab Law that "Not an inch of acquired land will go to industrialists even if it is a joint venture." . The conflict shall be over.
People know very well about Amit Shah and how must truth is in his speech. They talk one thing and do something. If not an inch of acquired land is given to industrialist, then what for land is acquired forcefully from farmers?
