The matter is loud and clear that he will be respectfully executed by the orders of the supreme authority of law,The Supreme Court of India and no body is allowed to comment on it lest he will be punished under contempt of Court.Simple
Re: YAKOOB ... AND INNOCENT?
by ram on Jul 22, 2015 04:55 PM
Until the crime is proven in courts, they say let the courts decide. Once the court decides, they say mercy petition. Once mercy petition is rejected they say I dont know. And later they will blame the country for punishing minorities.
It looks in India Supreme Court, Parliament, these are not the highest authority of law but it is media. Media now indulge everything & to any extent, so called politicians are far behind media.
Re: Meida Trial
by rajashi ghosh on Jul 22, 2015 05:36 PM
Parliament unfortunately houses some of the biggest criminals in India, many of whom pretend to be so-called representatives of the common man of India.
This website must be sued for disrespect to indian courts...for writing again and again saying Memon is innocent..Are you saying that the Indian courts are fools..? You know better than them?
Re: This webiste must be sued for disrespect to courts..
by ram on Jul 22, 2015 04:45 PM
Yes rediff is far more qualified than the Supreme court, or the president who rejected Yaqubs Plea
Re: This webiste must be sued for disrespect to courts..
by S Balasubramanyam on Jul 22, 2015 04:50 PM
I am surprised why Yakub was kept in jail for all these years at our cost. He should have been hanged long time back...
Re: Re: This webiste must be sued for disrespect to courts..
by ram on Jul 22, 2015 05:35 PM
He was kept in jail so that it will be a fair trial. So he was given a chance to prove his innocence
By running these kind of stories, the publishers is saying that entire Indian Judiciary up to Supreme Court level, review of its own decisions by other Judges, the President of India and every one associated with case are incompetent and blind who would have not tested the case on hard evidence. Convict would have thought that either he will not be caught or will get away with the massacre of 254 people, loss of properties, disabling injuries with the help of our secular fraternity and press. Press does not about his misdeed and plight of those who suffered, talk execution of thousands in Pakistan by its Government, and how the minorities there are executed on flimsy grounds such as blasphemy
Re: Re: What do you mean Innocent
by ram on Jul 22, 2015 04:42 PM
I fail to understand this line. I am sure many muslims where also killed in these blasts. Isnt this justice served to all Indians?
Re: Re: Re: What do you mean Innocent
by suryakant agrawal on Jul 22, 2015 04:45 PM
Crime has to been as a crime, that is all, why bring religion into it. Our judiciary is quite competent
