Indeed it is a great pleasure to know that our beloved (Print this message) Prime Minister has kept good rapport and relations within a span of eight months with USA, Australia, Nepal, Bhutan, Burma etc. due to which there is every possibility to increase bilateral relations in trade, commerce and developing smart cities in India with their full support and technical know-how, the same thing could not be achieved since six decades of Corrupt Congress regime in India just corruption and criticisms in political parties with each other has been abruptly increased so many folds. During the regime of Shri Atal Jee term as PM of India will not be forgotten by the people of India and it will be remembered in the hearts of the citizens of India for good governance, development and keeping good relations with US, UK, Germany and France will not be forgotten.
Modi critics will never stop criticizing him regardless of what good he achieves. Nor will Modi fans stop adoring him regardless of what bad he does or did. This kind of illogical unobjective treatment is true not just for Modi but for all famous personalities. This is one reason why our political leadership at all levels is so ineffective. When so many millions are incapable of looking at a situation objectively, it's not possible to improve the country at all.
Re: Indians think emotionally not objectively
by Om Parkash Mehta on Feb 01, 2015 08:08 PM
Indians cannot be foolish for all times to come.Mr Modi had belittled himself by suppression of part statement of Kejriwal. Said 'Anarchist" suppressing that Kejriwal compared his peaceful demonstration legal under the Constitution with that of Mahatma Gandhi to rebut perverse thinking. Calling Kejriwal as Back stabber for his renunciation of C.M Post for the betterment of Delhi organisation and choosing Election as the proper remedy. Why the BJP did not offer for coalition Govt. Mr ManiRam Bagri,a great Socialist provoked people for votes by his rubbish talk 'Congress has extracted butter of Electric power leaving water useless for fields' What is the diffeence between the misleading befooling of Mr Bagri and Mr Modi?
Slightly paraphrasing the line of Dr.Chauthaiwale - the US is seeing unprecedented opportunitits in areas of business, trade, defence, environment. That is the reaso for the warmth and apparent friendship. Narendra Modi was not petty enough to carry the humiliation and for him nation comes first. The UPA utterly dependent on the Communists for survival of the Govt. missed ten long years of opportunity to make India economically powerful. We should examine what India has gained out of 'non alignment' policy over the past sixty six years without being sentimental.
It is really surprising to see what kind of bonhomie he has achieved with top world leaders. If you can make friend with them good relations and natural outcome follow. The world is interconnected particularly in trade. To make a success of make in India, such initiatives will prove to be very fruitful.
It is depends in which angle one looks at each issues. Critics of Modi looks on that angle and supporters the other way. It is very difficult to find somebody looking things on national perspective other than mere politics!!!
Re: Obama visit
by Dada on Feb 01, 2015 01:49 AM
People will always look at things from their own inclination of political preference. But, as long as Nation is benefitting, I think its just the democratic spirit. As it is said that, some people can be fooled for sometime, but all the people cannot be fooled all the time. I trust that People will realize sooner or later what is good for them and Nation.
Re: Obama visit
by paul theo on Feb 01, 2015 10:44 AM
A MAN WHO HAS KICKED OUT HIS WIFE AND WEARS A 10 LAKHS SUIT AND WHO DOES NOT OPEN HIS MOUTH ON THE ATROCITIES OF THE HARD CORE FUNDAMENTALISTS IS NOT FIT TO BE P.M. OF THIS COUNTRY. HE HAS THE VOTES OF ONLY 31% OF THE PEOPLES VOTE, WHAT ABOUT THE OPINION OF THE BALANCE 69% WHO DONT SUPPORT HIS VIEWS?
Re: Re: Obama visit
by madhusudan rao on Feb 01, 2015 06:04 PM
When did any party won more than 51% of the vote? Who are you to say that he cannot be pm.
