It seems they are in action for some unknown objectives. Passing bills through ordinance itself disregard democratic values. Further all acts seems to fullfill dreams of funding members and not the voters. Govt. must not mistake as it has to come back to voters and if they have to succeed by other means than communal flares then they must act wisely.
Re: Re: Govt. is puzzling on every move.
by hyderabadi on Jan 14, 2015 04:38 PM
Dont know we you have read the acquisition bill, goverment needs to pay heavily for any land acquisition, its not like that paying cheaply and running away
there is any talk of development ... they want houses, power plants, industry, roads, airports etc but do not want any land to be used ... they should go to Swarg where everything if floating in vacuum .... no requirement of land no problems !!
Re: These Barsatii Mendhaks start croaking ... whenever..
by Connan on Jan 15, 2015 04:50 AM
She is not fighting so that land should not be used, In the west land is acquired through market price, your modi is taking that away and getting back old british law so that his buddy corporations can acquire land through a government ordinance.
Re: Re: These Barsatii Mendhaks start croaking ... whenever..
by Connan on Jan 15, 2015 04:52 AM
Without paying fair market value to the people whose land has been forcibly be taken. How would you like it if the government came for your house, would you be willing to give it for the good of india.
Re: These Barsatii Mendhaks start croaking ... whenever..
by on Jan 15, 2015 08:59 AM
The colonialist British invaders had created the Land Acquisition Act just to fulfill their agenda of LOOTING India -- they did not care about the Indian People, and were not interested whether their acts destroyed or negatively impacted the environment, culture, traditions of the Indian people. Each and every Indian citizen has a right to live in the country and engage and continue their ancestral professions and trades. The government has no right to enact laws that can forcibly and without the consent of the person, take away his/her land and other properties. Development should be for the benefit of the Indian citizen and not solely for the corporations, the politicians and their "affectionate buddies" -- the fundamental rights of an individual regarding the ownership of land and property should never be violated. The country does not belong to the government and politicians -- the country belongs to the people. LEGAL PLUNDER by enacting such laws should never be allowed!! Where those dispossessed and displaced by the government ordinance go? What will happen to them and their families?? It is a shame that the independent government of India still wants to continue the draconian laws of the British-Vultures!!
D. Goel pkl ,afternoon 12.45pm, Tuesday, January 14, 2015. I feelsorry to disagree with such dedicatedsocial activist asMS Kedhaji whosweconcernsfor thepoor indigenttribalsare very genuine. However, with great humility ,letmeseek her opinion thatmustourconcern for tribals makees usoblivious of equally thwecompulsion ofcreatingRapidIndustrial Economuy thatalonecan makeour poor escape endemiccommodification undersubsistentAgrarian Poverty, Sooner or later, wehave to appreciate thatwe can proceed to real equality without shiftingour masses frompoor rain fed agriculture to quick workingIndustrial Productions, which shouldleadto Modernity andUrbanization , with due Respectsto you -MS Medhaji your greatAdmirer D. Goel
Re: MedhaPatkarPleadsforsubsistentAgrarian Economy andPoverty...
by Faisal Tabrez on Jan 14, 2015 04:08 PM
You are making no sense. You mean to say that poors shall sell their fields even if they don't wish. Will you justify if same is made to you? No system of justice can advocate that owners will can be axed if business wishes to aquire his / her property. One can request but there shall be no intimation on same.
Re: beware
by Faisal Tabrez on Jan 14, 2015 04:13 PM
US or any industrist will not like to pay for Medha but will definately like to remove her from their way to India. Still their is a saying " Sherlock truth is always hidden and bitter to digest".
Re: beware
by hyderabadi on Jan 14, 2015 04:41 PM
NGO never wants india to prosper, I will a simple example, in Hyd for acquiring land for Metro court has taken two years for the case filed by few persons, those person whose land was acquired goverment paid 2.5 of market value construction cost per sqft, its a wastage of time for development
Re: beware
by Syed Ahmedulla on Jan 14, 2015 05:12 PM
what do you mean? By the way, Ms. Medha Patkar is working in protecting environment and poor people from so many years. And......... how can you blame her. Do you have any proof to what you say and what you are believing? If yes, elaborate, NOW. Else, we can understand...
Re: Re: beware
by RC on Jan 14, 2015 09:52 PM
Syed-- just because the law is proposed by BJP-- your types will oppose it. If it was Congress-- you woud have said the contrary. Loser!! Thats what you are.
Re: Re: Re: beware
by Connan on Jan 15, 2015 04:56 AM
And just because the law is made by BJP you people will fight for it even if it is wrong. Do you even know that this is reverting back to old british law which the british had put so that they could steal land from poor indians?
Re: beware
by Connan on Jan 15, 2015 04:54 AM
Last election she filed a assets report she only has 2 lakhs, how much does your papa gadkari have? and how did he get it.
Medhaji....despite all your rhetorics just tell me how much dollars you get from western powers and missionaries to ensure that India never progresses...Your opposition to Narmada dam is known...End result..crores of people benefitted...
Re: Just answer ...
by Connan on Jan 15, 2015 04:59 AM
She only has 2 lakhs in assets, how much does your papa gadkari have. BJP media budget last election cycle was 600 cr and yet you have no guts to ask your bagh-wan modi where this money came from, you would rather ask a poor woman fighting for poor peoples rights. And by the way if she had more money or if your Amit shah could even find one shred of evidence this would be front page news.
Re: Re: Just answer ...
by Mak Kumar on Jan 15, 2015 10:16 AM
2 laksh in assets??? And you believe that, similar as you believe Rahul Gandhi's declaration that all his assets worth is just Rs 2 crore!!!
As per Medha Patkar, Narmada Project was bad. Or it should have been done in a way, wherein it can never proceed ahead. Had people listened to here in early 2000s then the Narmada Project would have got stuck up for may be another 30 years. Alas who benefited from it. Didn't the people of Gujarat benifited? Theorotically your concepts may be good, but practically they have always cause loss of benefits to all.
Re: Re: So Narmada Dam was bad?
by Mak Kumar on Jan 15, 2015 10:18 AM
Connan, have you ever visited Kutch? If you had you would obviously not have made such a statement. Go there and see for youself the water canals which has been made possible due to the Narmada project. Btw Kutch is today exporting Mangoes , a land where only cactus grew 20 years back! Do you get it?? Obviously not
Re: Re: Re: So Narmada Dam was bad?
by Connan on Jan 16, 2015 06:20 AM
Yeah I have and so has the government who are proclaiming there is no water, yeah mangoes khayali mangoes.
Re: Medha
by vinod vinod on Jan 14, 2015 12:28 PM
Dear friend it is not new concept, it is more advanced but in line with the same concept. so when u asked "" why poor could not be improved in last 67 years"", some one, ,may be your granson will ask again after 30 years taht "" why poor could not be improved in last 107 years.
