Discussion Board

'Nehru was as much to blame as Jinnah for Partition'


Total 116 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8
Gurughantal
Can't
by Gurughantal on Aug 13, 2015 11:17 AM  | Hide replies

Agree less.Nehru was rangeela without any pride for our culture and was not competent enough thru handling of kashmir and china war

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
shashi phatak
Re: Can't
by shashi phatak on Aug 13, 2015 12:38 PM
I fully agree that Nehru and Gandhi may be great to so many Indians. But Nehru was a playboy. he was more interested in building International image. Gandhiji did all confusing acts. he succumbed to Nehru"s pressure. Jinnah probably would had agreed to keep India United had Mr. Lokamanya Tilak was alive. Mr. Nehru to keep his Priministership in tact kept Mr.Sawarkar in virtual Jail. Because if Sawarkar and Sardar Patel were allowed to act. They would have prevented partition or
solved Kashmir problem 60 years ago. Mr. Nehru's deeds and Mr. Gandhi's diplomacy have landed us in perpetual troubles.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
kavishwar mokal
Re: Re: Can't
by kavishwar mokal on Aug 13, 2015 09:06 PM
Superb analysis, kudos to you !!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rk singh
I don't like Gandhi and Nehru, but.......
by rk singh on Aug 13, 2015 11:16 AM  | Hide replies

partition was a thing which nobody could prevent. Indian Muslims were overwhelmingly in support of partition. They even voted for it. If partition was prevented, there would have been a lot of anarchy all over India from day-1. Communal riots would not have stopped till date and India would have been covered in blood.

Nehru and Gandhi could have facilitated civilised exchange of populations between India and Pakistan - till the whole task was complete. The purpose of partition was defeated when 200 million Muslims still stayed back in India- after opting out overwhelmingly. It is like having the cake and eating too.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
pradeep agarwal
Re: I don't like Gandhi and Nehru, but.......
by pradeep agarwal on Aug 13, 2015 11:27 AM
I agree with you that partition was inevitable but could have been managed better if Patel was made PM.Nehru had no time for details & was too scared of international image.His misadventure in J&K by announcing UN monitored referendum is still causing so much problem for generations.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Prakash Bedekar
Sensorship
by Prakash Bedekar on Aug 13, 2015 11:15 AM  | Hide replies

Moderatoe Saheb, Are you totally against all criticism of RSS or you do not want the facts to be brought out? In such case why ask for participation in discussions?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Sensorship
by Against Pseudos on Aug 13, 2015 01:37 PM
Why do you want to bring RSS into all discussions? Any idea?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Prashant Gupta
Partition
by Prashant Gupta on Aug 13, 2015 11:12 AM

Congress had the example in History of USA who did not agree to partition in spite of long civil war. Gandhiji had told many times that partition will be on his dead body. Britishers had told that they will leave the country by June,1948. In spite of this, Congress agreed for partition. Gandhiji did not go for fast against this, though on many occasions he had done this for very small causes. Then who made Gandhiji agree for partition? Answer is obvious. The result is there is complete communal divide today and we are at continuous war.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 116 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8
Write a message